Suppr超能文献

对初级保健中针对中年成年人的痴呆症风险降低干预措施的系统评价。

A systematic review of targeted dementia risk reduction interventions in middle-aged adults in Primary Care.

作者信息

Tullipan Mary, George Johnson, Magin Parker, Godbee Kali, Ferns Jane, Frewin Claire

机构信息

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia & School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jun;12(6):100187. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100187. Epub 2025 May 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pathological changes of dementia are thought to commence in mid-life, making mid-life an attractive target for dementia risk reduction. This review assessed the current literature on multidomain dementia risk-reduction interventions in mid-life.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE for eligible studies. Studies were included if (i) participants had a mean age between 45 and 65 years, (ii) the intervention was delivered in a primary care setting and targeted two or more dementia risk factors, and (iii) outcomes were change in cognitive function or change in risk score. Data was extracted and assessed for bias using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. Participants' mean age ranged from 45.3 to 64.2 years. Interventions ranged from 10 weeks to 9.8 years and targeted between two and six dementia risk factors. There was a large variation in the type of outcome and statistical tests utilised across the included studies, impacting the ability to draw comparisons between the studies and draw conclusions regarding treatment effects. There was a high risk of bias in three of the studies and some concerns of bias in the other four studies. Two studies assessing dementia risk found a reduction in risk scores at their primary endpoint. None of the included studies found a statistically significant change in cognition from their interventions. This may be attributable in part to not assessing cognition prior to the interventions, limited risk factors being addressed, and the short follow-up/duration of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence for multidomain dementia risk-reduction interventions in mid-life is not definitive; however, given their substantive potential benefits and likely limited harms, they may be considered for implementation in clinical practice after further evaluation. Future trials that have longer follow-ups, target a broader range of dementia risk factors, and that use consistent outcome measures will be valuable. Strategies to maximise implementation of multidomain interventions and long-term effectiveness will enhance the evidence base for dementia prevention in primary care.

摘要

背景

痴呆症的病理变化被认为始于中年,这使得中年成为降低痴呆症风险的一个有吸引力的目标。本综述评估了当前关于中年多领域痴呆症风险降低干预措施的文献。

方法

我们系统检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE数据库以查找符合条件的研究。纳入的研究需满足以下条件:(i)参与者的平均年龄在45至65岁之间;(ii)干预措施在初级保健环境中实施,且针对两个或更多痴呆症风险因素;(iii)结局为认知功能的变化或风险评分的变化。使用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具提取数据并评估偏倚。

结果

纳入了7项研究。参与者的平均年龄在45.3至64.2岁之间。干预措施的时长从10周至9.8年不等,针对2至6个痴呆症风险因素。纳入研究中结局类型和所采用的统计检验存在很大差异,影响了进行研究间比较以及得出治疗效果结论的能力。3项研究存在高偏倚风险,另外4项研究存在一些偏倚问题。两项评估痴呆症风险的研究在其主要终点发现风险评分有所降低。纳入的研究均未发现干预措施使认知功能发生统计学上的显著变化。这可能部分归因于在干预前未评估认知功能、所涉及的风险因素有限以及研究的随访期/持续时间较短。

结论

目前关于中年多领域痴呆症风险降低干预措施的证据尚不明确;然而,鉴于其潜在的巨大益处以及可能有限的危害,在进一步评估后可考虑在临床实践中实施。未来进行更长随访、针对更广泛的痴呆症风险因素且采用一致结局指标的试验将很有价值。最大化多领域干预措施的实施和长期有效性的策略将加强初级保健中痴呆症预防的证据基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef5d/12434273/9ff52220e0b9/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验