Kløve Kasper, Petersen Anders
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06775-1.
Although there is broad agreement that caffeine provides an acute improvement in attention in the normal population, estimates of effect size vary and the relationship between dose and effect is unclear.
To examine the acute effect of caffeine on attention in a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for records published in English with no limits on the year of publication. Studies were included if they were randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and if they examined the acute effect of pure caffeine on behavioral tests of attention in rested, healthy adults. For every included trial, eligible outcomes were extracted and aggregated to form one composite standardized mean difference (SMD; Hedges' adjusted g) for reaction time and one for accuracy. The SMDs were then combined in random-effects meta-analyses. Additionally, several subgroup analyses were conducted, including meta-regressions on dose-response relationships.
Thirty-one trials with a total of 1455 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Significant effects in favor of caffeine were found for both accuracy, g = 0.27, and reaction time, g = 0.28. Subgroup analyses showed that higher doses of caffeine (≥ 200 mg) improved both reaction time and accuracy more than lower doses, but whereas a positive linear dose-response relationship was found for reaction time, a quadratic relationship was found for accuracy. The effect of caffeine was not related to differences in habitual caffeine consumption, task complexity, or which attention network was taxed.
The current evidence shows that in the normal population, caffeine acutely enhances attention by improving both reaction time and accuracy. However, whereas higher doses continue to enhance reaction time, accuracy improves only up to a certain point before declining.
尽管人们普遍认为咖啡因能使正常人群的注意力得到急性改善,但效应大小的估计各不相同,且剂量与效应之间的关系尚不清楚。
通过系统评价和荟萃分析来研究咖啡因对注意力的急性影响。
检索了PsycINFO、PubMed和Scopus数据库中以英文发表的记录,对发表年份没有限制。纳入的研究需为随机、双盲、安慰剂对照,且研究了纯咖啡因对休息良好的健康成年人注意力行为测试的急性影响。对于每项纳入的试验,提取符合条件的结果并汇总,以形成一个关于反应时间的综合标准化均数差(SMD;Hedges校正g值)和一个关于准确性的综合标准化均数差。然后将这些SMD合并进行随机效应荟萃分析。此外,还进行了几项亚组分析,包括对剂量反应关系的meta回归分析。
荟萃分析纳入了31项试验,共1455名参与者。在准确性(g = 0.27)和反应时间(g = 0.28)方面均发现了有利于咖啡因的显著效应。亚组分析表明,较高剂量的咖啡因(≥200mg)比较低剂量更能改善反应时间和准确性,但反应时间呈现正线性剂量反应关系,而准确性呈现二次关系。咖啡因的效应与习惯性咖啡因摄入量、任务复杂性或所涉及的注意力网络的差异无关。
目前的证据表明,在正常人群中,咖啡因通过改善反应时间和准确性来急性增强注意力。然而,虽然较高剂量继续提高反应时间,但准确性仅在达到一定程度之前提高,之后会下降。