Koprowski Christopher, Subedi Keshab, Jurkovitz Claudine T, Sites Karen, Scott Michael, Petrelli Nicholas
, 115 Wynleigh Dr E, Wilmington, DE, 19807, USA.
Institute for Research on Equity and Community Health (iREACH)- Christiana Care Avenue North Campus, Suite NE2- 4000 Nexus Drive, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 8;33(6):457. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09477-8.
This study was designed to determine whether a series of interventions selected for our institution after systematic analysis of the cancer treatment process could decrease emergency room visits and hospital admissions in cancer patients treated with curative intent. A clinical pathway was devised with five key interventions designed to enhance supportive care, increase communication among providers, and quantify nurse navigator accountability.
Patients with solid tumors treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation with curative intent were eligible for the study. They were identified in the multidisciplinary clinics of the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center of the Christian Care Health System (HFGCCRI). A total of 318 consecutive pathway patients were analyzed and compared to 455 historical controls. Pathway patients were selected from the beginning of the program in 2016 until 2019 and followed from the onset of radiotherapy until 1 month after the completion of radiotherapy. Emergency room (ED) visits and inpatient admissions were the primary outcomes of the study. The independent variables-including age, performance status, sex, race, insurance status, and diagnosis-were analyzed using regression-based adjustment for covariates.
The expected number of ED visits during the study period was 46% lower for SCOOP patients than for controls. Likewise, the expected number of hospitalizations was 50% lower for SCOOP patients. Both were statistically significant. Reanalysis after propensity score matching yielded similar results.
Pathway interventions specifically selected for our institution appeared to curtail ED visits and admissions in patients treated with exacting treatment regimens.
本研究旨在确定在对癌症治疗过程进行系统分析后为我们机构选择的一系列干预措施是否能减少接受根治性治疗的癌症患者的急诊就诊和住院次数。设计了一条临床路径,包含五项关键干预措施,旨在加强支持性护理、增进医护人员之间的沟通以及量化护士导航员的责任。
符合条件的研究对象为接受同步化疗和放疗且有根治意图的实体瘤患者。他们在基督教关怀健康系统海伦·F·格雷厄姆癌症中心(HFGCCRI)的多学科诊所中被识别出来。总共对318名连续入组路径的患者进行了分析,并与455名历史对照患者进行比较。路径患者从2016年项目开始时选取,直至2019年,并从放疗开始一直随访至放疗结束后1个月。急诊就诊和住院是该研究的主要结局。使用基于回归的协变量调整分析包括年龄、体能状态、性别、种族、保险状况和诊断在内的自变量。
在研究期间,SCOOP患者的预期急诊就诊次数比对照组低46%。同样,SCOOP患者的预期住院次数低50%。两者均具有统计学意义。倾向得分匹配后的重新分析得出了类似结果。
专门为我们机构选择的路径干预措施似乎减少了接受严格治疗方案患者的急诊就诊和住院次数。