de Souza Mamede Vanusa Felicio, Bernabé Rayne de Almeida Marques, Santos Thalita Gonçalves, da Silva Larissa Leopoldino, de Souza Vieira Mariana, Marques-Rocha José Luiz, Guandalini Valdete Regina
Postgraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Department of Integrated Health Education, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 7;25(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14062-7.
Sarcopenia is characterized by the loss of muscle strength and mass and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer. However, no specific tool is capable of assessing the risk of sarcopenia in this population. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the performance of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF as screening tools for the risk of sarcopenia in women with breast cancer.
An observational cross-sectional study was conducted involving women with breast cancer diagnosed in the previous 12 months. The risk of sarcopenia was identified by SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF. As proposed by the EWGSOP2, sarcopenia was defined as low muscle strength (grip strength: <23.0 kg) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index < 6.38 kg/m (determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). The performance of the screening tools was assessed by calculating specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using DeLong's test.
This study included 168 women with a mean age of 54.8 ± 11.3 years. The prevalence of sarcopenia risk ranged from 10.1 to 36.6%, depending on the screening tool employed. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 8.3%. Using the presence of sarcopenia as reference, the SARC-F had an AUC of 0.550 [(0.396-0.703) p = 0.54], sensitivity of 21.4%, and specificity of 85.7%; the SARC-CalF had an AUC of 0.790 [(0.654-0.927) p < 0.001], sensitivity of 42.8%, and specificity of 92.2%; the BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF had an AUC of 0.521 [(0.385-0.658) p = 0.08], sensitivity of 28.6%, and specificity of 63.0%. Therefore, the SARC-CalF tool had low sensitivity and high specificity.
SARC-CalF performed the best compared to the alternatives provided. However, based on the current results, it may be necessary to reconsider the use of either of these instruments as a screening option for sarcopenia risk in women with breast cancer.
肌肉减少症的特征是肌肉力量和质量的丧失,并且与乳腺癌女性较差的临床结局相关。然而,没有特定工具能够评估该人群中肌肉减少症的风险。因此,本研究的目的是比较SARC-F、SARC-CalF和体重指数(BMI)调整后的SARC-CalF作为乳腺癌女性肌肉减少症风险筛查工具的性能。
进行了一项观察性横断面研究,纳入在过去12个月内确诊为乳腺癌的女性。通过SARC-F、SARC-CalF和BMI调整后的SARC-CalF来确定肌肉减少症的风险。根据欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组(EWGSOP2)的建议,肌肉减少症定义为低肌肉力量(握力:<23.0 kg)和四肢骨骼肌质量指数<6.38 kg/m²(通过双能X线吸收法测定)。通过计算特异性、敏感性、阳性和阴性预测值以及ROC曲线下面积(AUC)来评估筛查工具的性能。使用德龙检验比较AUC值。
本研究纳入了168名女性,平均年龄为54.8±11.3岁。根据所采用的筛查工具,肌肉减少症风险的患病率在10.1%至36.6%之间。肌肉减少症的患病率为8.3%。以肌肉减少症的存在为参照,SARC-F的AUC为0.550[(0.396 - 0.703)p = 0.54],敏感性为21.4%,特异性为85.7%;SARC-CalF的AUC为0.790[(0.654 - 0.927)p < 0.001],敏感性为42.8%,特异性为92.2%;BMI调整后的SARC-CalF的AUC为0.521[(0.385 - 0.658)p = 0.08],敏感性为28.6%,特异性为63.0%。因此,SARC-CalF工具敏感性低但特异性高。
与所提供的其他工具相比,SARC-CalF表现最佳。然而,基于目前的结果,可能有必要重新考虑将这些工具中的任何一种作为乳腺癌女性肌肉减少症风险的筛查选项。