Suppr超能文献

在紧急医疗通信中心引入现场直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)医生——对挪威一个HEMS基地调度精度的影响

Introducing an on-site Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) physician at the Emergency Medical Communication Centre - implications for dispatch precision at a Norwegian HEMS base.

作者信息

Ulvin Ole Erik, Uleberg Oddvar, Asheim Andreas, Haugland Helge

机构信息

Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Services, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 May 7;33(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01396-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dispatch precision of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) is a key topic in prehospital research. In Norway, the combined role of the HEMS physician on-call and the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) physician has been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on HEMS dispatch precision by transferring the medical decision-making from an on-call HEMS physician to an on-site HEMS physician in the EMCC.

METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study, a HEMS physician was on-site in Trondheim EMCC during defined working hours from February 1st through July 5th, 2024. When on-site, the decision to dispatch Trondheim HEMS was made by this EMCC physician. Primary outcome was unnecessary HEMS dispatches, i.e. missions where neither advanced treatment nor logistical contributions were provided following HEMS dispatch. Secondary outcomes were HEMS alarm and activation time, rejected HEMS missions and National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA)-scores of encountered HEMS patients. Outcomes were analysed by difference-in-differences analyses.

RESULTS

785 HEMS missions were included in the analyses. There was no significant difference in the risk of an unnecessary mission (percentage point risk difference [RD] 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.4-18.6) or the proportion of patients with NACA scores of 4 or higher (RD -5.8, 95% CI -17.9-6.3) following the intervention.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of increased HEMS dispatch precision, measured by the proportion of missions without medical or logistical contributions, when transferring the medical decision regarding HEMS dispatch from the HEMS physician on-call to an on-site EMCC physician in this study.

摘要

背景

直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)的调度精度是院前研究的一个关键课题。在挪威,HEMS随叫随到医生和紧急医疗通信中心(EMCC)医生的联合作用受到了挑战。本研究旨在评估将医疗决策从随叫随到的HEMS医生转移到EMCC的现场HEMS医生对HEMS调度精度的影响。

方法

在这项准实验研究中,一名HEMS医生于2024年2月1日至7月5日的规定工作时间内在特隆赫姆EMCC现场。在现场时,由该EMCC医生做出派遣特隆赫姆HEMS的决定。主要结局是不必要的HEMS派遣,即HEMS派遣后既未提供高级治疗也未提供后勤支持的任务。次要结局是HEMS警报和启动时间、被拒绝的HEMS任务以及所遇到的HEMS患者的美国国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)评分。通过差分分析对结局进行分析。

结果

785次HEMS任务纳入分析。干预后,不必要任务的风险(百分点风险差异[RD]5.6,95%置信区间[CI]-7.4-18.6)或NACA评分为4或更高的患者比例(RD-5.8,95%CI-17.9-6.3)没有显著差异。

结论

在本研究中,当将关于HEMS派遣的医疗决策从随叫随到的HEMS医生转移到现场的EMCC医生时,我们没有发现以无医疗或后勤支持的任务比例衡量的HEMS调度精度提高的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f5f/12057114/edc039c0fc7c/13049_2025_1396_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验