• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery.与头孢唑林相比,万古霉素预防性抗生素治疗会增加脊柱手术后手术部位感染的风险。
Global Spine J. 2025 May 7:21925682251341833. doi: 10.1177/21925682251341833.
2
Is Vancomycin-only Prophylaxis for Patients With Penicillin Allergy Associated With Increased Risk of Infection After Arthroplasty?仅使用万古霉素对青霉素过敏患者进行关节置换术后感染预防是否会增加感染风险?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1601-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4672-4.
3
The Impact of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Standard Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion.万古霉素和头孢唑林作为标准术前抗生素预防用药对脊柱内固定术后手术部位感染的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):E366-E371. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002839.
4
Cefazolin versus vancomycin for neurosurgical operative prophylaxis - A single institution retrospective cohort study.头孢唑林与万古霉素用于神经外科手术预防——一项单机构回顾性队列研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;182:152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 19.
5
Multicentre randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial of combination vancomycin and cefazolin surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: the Australian surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (ASAP) trial.万古霉素与头孢唑林联合用于外科手术抗生素预防的多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验:澳大利亚外科手术抗生素预防(ASAP)试验
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 3;9(11):e033718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033718.
6
Does the Application of Topical Vancomycin Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.局部万古霉素应用是否能降低脊柱手术部位感染?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2212-2219. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003179. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
7
A Retrospective Study on the Protective Effects of Topical Vancomycin in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Spinal Fusion.局部应用万古霉素对多节段脊柱融合术患者保护作用的回顾性研究
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Jan;36(1):19-25. doi: 10.1002/phar.1678. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
8
Perioperative Infection Prophylaxis With Vancomycin is a Significant Risk Factor for Deep Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery.万古霉素预防围手术期感染是脊柱手术深部手术部位感染的一个重要危险因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Nov 15;49(22):1583-1590. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005081. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
9
Surgical Site Infection After Arthroplasty: Comparative Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics: Do Surgical Care Improvement Project Guidelines Need to Be Updated?关节置换术后的手术部位感染:预防性抗生素的比较效果:外科手术质量改进项目指南是否需要更新?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):970-977. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00663.
10
Antimicrobial prophylaxis and the prevention of surgical site infection in cardiac surgery: an analysis of 21 007 patients in Switzerland†.心脏外科手术中的抗菌预防和手术部位感染预防:瑞士 21007 例患者的分析†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Oct 1;56(4):800-806. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz039.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the editor: 'Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery' by Brandon J. Herrington et al.致编辑的信:布兰登·J·赫林顿等人所著《与头孢唑林相比,万古霉素预防性抗生素增加脊柱手术后手术部位感染风险》
Global Spine J. 2025 Sep;15(7):3559-3560. doi: 10.1177/21925682251352850. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
2
Letter to the Editor Regarding "Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery".致编辑的信:关于“与头孢唑林相比,万古霉素预防性抗生素增加脊柱手术后手术部位感染风险”
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 20:21925682251352851. doi: 10.1177/21925682251352851.

本文引用的文献

1
After primary shoulder arthroplasty appropriate vancomycin antibiotic prophylaxis does not lead to increased infectious complications when compared to cefazolin.初次肩关节置换术后,与头孢唑林相比,使用万古霉素进行适当的抗生素预防并不会增加感染性并发症的发生风险。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Dec;33(12):2612-2618. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.059. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
The impact of anxiety and depression on lumbar spine surgical outcomes: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.焦虑和抑郁对腰椎手术结果的影响:密歇根脊柱手术改进协作研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Mar 1;40(6):741-750. doi: 10.3171/2023.12.SPINE23860. Print 2024 Jun 1.
3
Management of Penicillin Allergy in the Perioperative Setting.围手术期青霉素过敏的管理
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Feb 5;13(2):157. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020157.
4
Staphylococcus aureus surface attachment selectively influences tolerance against charged antibiotics.金黄色葡萄球菌表面附着选择性地影响对带电荷抗生素的耐受性。
Acta Biomater. 2024 Feb;175:369-381. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.12.029. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with higher rates of elbow periprosthetic joint infection.非头孢唑林抗生素预防与肘关节假体周围感染的较高发生率相关。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Apr;33(4):940-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
6
Trial of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Surgical Prophylaxis in Arthroplasty.万古霉素和头孢唑林在关节置换术中作为预防用药的试验
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1488-1498. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301401.
7
Cefazolin vs Second-line Antibiotics for Surgical Site Infection Prevention After Total Joint Arthroplasty Among Patients With a Beta-lactam Allergy.头孢唑林与二线抗生素用于预防β-内酰胺类过敏患者全关节置换术后手术部位感染的比较
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 24;10(6):ofad224. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad224. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Cefazolin prophylaxis in spine surgery: patients are frequently underdosed and at increased risk for infection.头孢唑林预防脊柱手术感染:患者常剂量不足,感染风险增加。
Spine J. 2022 Sep;22(9):1442-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.018. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
9
The effect of preoperative patient-reported anxiety on morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients undergoing major general surgery.术前患者报告的焦虑对接受大普外科手术患者的发病率和死亡率结局的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 15;12(1):6312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10302-z.
10
Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefazolin Is Associated with Lower Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates Than Non-Cefazolin Alternatives.头孢唑林预防性应用与非头孢唑林替代方案相比,可降低肩部人工关节周围感染率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 May 18;104(10):872-880. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00445. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

与头孢唑林相比,万古霉素预防性抗生素治疗会增加脊柱手术后手术部位感染的风险。

Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery.

作者信息

Herrington Brandon J, Urquhart Jennifer C, Rasoulinejad Parham, Siddiqi Fawaz, Gurr Kevin, Bailey Christopher S

机构信息

Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2025 May 7:21925682251341833. doi: 10.1177/21925682251341833.

DOI:10.1177/21925682251341833
PMID:40336255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12061899/
Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective analysis of randomized controlled trial.ObjectivesSurgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery has severe negative health and financial consequences. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is a routinely used method to prevent SSIs in the spine patient population. The most commonly used antibiotic is cefazolin, with vancomycin often being substituted in the case of penicillin or cephalosporin allergy. Vancomycin as SAP has been associated with increased SSI in the joint replacement literature, but this is not yet well defined in the spinal surgery population. The purpose of this study was to determine whether vancomycin SAP compared to cefazolin SAP is associated with increased risk of SSI.Methods535 patients, aged 16 years or older, underwent elective multi-level open posterior spinal fusion surgery at the thoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbar levels. Demographic and operative characteristics as well as post-operative outcomes were compared between the following groups: (1) noninfected-cefazolin, (2) noninfected-vancomycin, (3) infected-cefazolin, and (4) infected-vancomycin. Primary outcomes were superficial and complicated (deep and organ/space) infections.ResultsThe following risk factors for SSI were identified in a logistic regression analysis: vancomycin (OR 2.498, 95% CI, 1.085-5.73, = 0.031), increasing operating time (OR 1.006, 95% CI, 1.001-1.010 = 0.010), weight (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.006-1.034, = 0.005), revision procedure (OR 2.343, 95% CI 1.283-4.277, = 0.006), and depression (OR 2.366, 95% CI 1.284-4.360, = 0.006).ConclusionsIn open posterior approach spinal fusion surgery, vancomycin SAP is associated with increased risk of infection compared to cefazolin SAP.

摘要

研究设计

对随机对照试验的回顾性分析。

目的

脊柱手术后手术部位感染(SSI)会对健康和经济造成严重负面影响。手术抗生素预防(SAP)是脊柱患者群体中预防SSI的常用方法。最常用的抗生素是头孢唑林,对于青霉素或头孢菌素过敏的情况,常改用万古霉素。在关节置换文献中,万古霉素作为SAP与SSI增加有关,但在脊柱手术人群中尚未明确。本研究的目的是确定与头孢唑林SAP相比,万古霉素SAP是否与SSI风险增加有关。

方法

535例16岁及以上患者接受了胸段、胸腰段或腰段的择期多节段开放性后路脊柱融合手术。比较以下几组的人口统计学和手术特征以及术后结果:(1)未感染-头孢唑林组,(2)未感染-万古霉素组,(3)感染-头孢唑林组,(4)感染-万古霉素组。主要结局为表浅和复杂(深部和器官/间隙)感染。

结果

在逻辑回归分析中确定了以下SSI的危险因素:万古霉素(比值比2.498,95%可信区间,1.085 - 5.73,P = 0.031)、手术时间增加(比值比1.006,95%可信区间,1.001 - 1.010,P = 0.010)、体重(比值比1.020,95%可信区间1.006 - 1.034,P = 0.005)、翻修手术(比值比2.343,95%可信区间1.283 - 4.277,P = 0.006)和抑郁(比值比2.366,95%可信区间1.284 - 4.360,P = 0.006)。

结论

在开放性后路脊柱融合手术中,与头孢唑林SAP相比,万古霉素SAP与感染风险增加有关。