文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Definitive chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: Safety and outcome.

作者信息

Kiladze Ivane, Chkhaidze Lika, Iovashvili Aleksandre, Natelauri Eteri, Sokurashvili Besik, Mariamidze Elene, Kacheishvili Nikoloz, Jeremic Branislav

机构信息

Evex Hospitals, Department of Clinical Oncology, Caucasus Medical Centre Tbilisi Georgia.

Evex Hospitals, Krystyna Kiel Oncology Center Kutaisi Georgia.

出版信息

Precis Radiat Oncol. 2023 Mar 25;7(1):51-58. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1190. eCollection 2023 Mar.


DOI:10.1002/pro6.1190
PMID:40336620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935065/
Abstract

: The efficacy and safety of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for elderly patients with unresectable esophageal cancer (EC) are not yet fully understood. We conducted this study to evaluate the outcome and toxicity in elder patients (65 years and over) of unresectable EC treated with dCRT. : From four Georgian cancer centers with a radiation oncology department, we identified 44 elderly patients with EC suitable according to the study criteria. Overall survival (OS) was estimated from the beginning of treatment and toxicity scored using CTCAE 5.0 criteria. : The median age of patients was 70.0 years (range 65-83 years), with male predominance (77.3%) and 59% of patients were with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 1. Because of significant dysphagia (grade 3-4) nine patients underwent intervention (stenting or gastrostomy) before dCRT. More than two-thirds of patients were squamous cell histological type (77.3%). Localization of tumors was equally distributed between the middle and lower parts of the esophagus (38.6%) and in 26 patients (59.1%) tumor length was more than 5 cm. The majority of patients had stage III disease (61.4%). Median survival was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-35.9). OS at 12 and 24 months was 53.7% and 43.6%, respectively. Fifteen patients (34%) were alive from 2.1 to 5.4 years after treatment. A statistically significant difference ( = 0.011) in median OS was found between patients who received full (not reached) overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months in patients who received nonfull dose of radiotherapy (RT) (95% CI 2.79-15.2). Additional analysis between age subgroups revealed that elder subgroup patients (>75 years) had the highest OS, compared to younger (65-70 years) and intermediate groups (71-75 years) ( = 0.001). The most common adverse events were grade 3-4 leukopenia (43.2%), anemia (29.5%), and esophagitis (27.3%). : The results of our study support the feasibility and efficacy of dCRT for unresectable EC in carefully selected elderly patients. Survival was correlated to complete dose of RT and therefore accurate selection of patients is crucial for better long-term survival. Our study showed that chronological age alone does not reflect a patient's ability to tolerate dCRT. Toxicity of dCRT is always a very important issue and patient selection must be very cautious in geriatric patients, although dCRT might benefit highly selected patients.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/11935065/ce74a78c0eba/PRO6-7-51-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/11935065/886d7dad4a82/PRO6-7-51-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/11935065/ad2730fbb6bb/PRO6-7-51-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/11935065/ce74a78c0eba/PRO6-7-51-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/11935065/886d7dad4a82/PRO6-7-51-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/11935065/ad2730fbb6bb/PRO6-7-51-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/11935065/ce74a78c0eba/PRO6-7-51-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Definitive chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: Safety and outcome.

Precis Radiat Oncol. 2023-3-25

[2]
Survival and Treatment Patterns in Stage II to III Esophageal Cancer.

JAMA Netw Open. 2024-10-1

[3]
Trimodality therapy and definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a single-center experience and review of the literature.

Dis Esophagus. 2015-10

[4]
Clinical Outcome After Esophagectomy or Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients (≥80 Years) With Esophageal Cancer.

Anticancer Res. 2022-8

[5]
Treatment strategies for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Cancer. 2024-9-4

[6]
Outcome of Weekly Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-based Definitive Chemoradiation in Oesophageal Cancer in Patients Not Considered to be Suitable for Platinum-Fluoropyrimidine-based Treatment: A Multicentre, Retrospective Review.

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019-10-26

[7]
Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

Radiother Oncol. 2021-9

[8]
Clinical prognostic factors for locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma treated after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Cancer Res Treat. 2013-12-31

[9]
Comparison of transthoracic esophagectomy with definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who could tolerate transthoracic esophagectomy.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015

[10]
Radiotherapy with S-1 for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 75 years or older.

Radiat Oncol. 2024-8-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study.

Lancet. 2021-11-20

[2]
Geriatric Assessment-Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2021-11-1

[3]
Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients, Current Treatment Options and Outcomes; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Cancers (Basel). 2021-4-27

[4]
How Is Geriatric Assessment Used in Clinical Practice for Older Adults With Cancer? A Survey of Cancer Providers by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021-6

[5]
Epidemiology of esophageal cancer: update in global trends, etiology and risk factors.

Clin J Gastroenterol. 2020-12

[6]
Single-Agent Versus Double-Agent Chemotherapy in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial.

Oncologist. 2020-12

[7]
Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline.

J Clin Oncol. 2020-8-10

[8]
Communication With Older Patients With Cancer Using Geriatric Assessment: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial From the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program.

JAMA Oncol. 2020-2-1

[9]
Comparison of definite chemoradiation therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluoruracil in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Radiat Oncol. 2018-8-2

[10]
Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.

J Clin Oncol. 2018-5-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索