• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床 T1bN0M0 期食管鳞癌患者行根治性放化疗与手术治疗的对比:一项回顾性研究。

Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Medical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2021 Sep;162:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.006
PMID:34265356
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the equivalence between definitive chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) and radical esophagectomy in clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 282 patients with cT1bN0M0 ESCC, 238 underwent radical esophagectomy and 44 underwent DCRT. Both treatments were retrospectively compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complications.

RESULTS

The DCRT group exhibited poorer patient characteristics than the surgery group, especially with mean age (73 vs. 63 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.001, each). The median follow-up duration was 49.5 (range, 0.4-97.0) and 45.5 months (range, 5.0-112.0) in the surgery and DCRT groups, respectively. In the DCRT group, clinical complete response was achieved in 43 patients (97.7%) at 1 month after treatment. The 5-year OS rates were 75.8% and 68.8% (p = 0.135) and the 5-year PFS were 63.8% and 57.8% (p = 0.637) for the surgery and DCRT groups, respectively. Local recurrence rates were identical between the two groups (11.4% and 11.4%), but the distant metastasis rate was lower in the DCRT group (n = 1, 2.27% vs. n = 29, 12.15%). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were observed in 11 patients (25%) of the DCRT group, and 56 patients (23.5%) in the surgery group showed grade 3-5 surgical complications, including mortality (n = 5).

CONCLUSION

Based on the non-inferior survival rates, recurrence patterns, and complication rates without critical surgical mortality, DCRT was comparable to esophagectomy for cT1bN0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在确定在临床 T1bN0M0 食管鳞癌(ESCC)中,根治性放化疗(DCRT)与根治性食管切除术的等效性。

材料与方法

在 282 例 cT1bN0M0 ESCC 患者中,238 例行根治性食管切除术,44 例行 DCRT。回顾性比较两组患者的总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)和并发症。

结果

DCRT 组患者的特征明显不如手术组,特别是平均年龄(73 岁比 63 岁)、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)状态和 Charlson 合并症指数(p<0.001,每项)。手术组和 DCRT 组的中位随访时间分别为 49.5(0.4-97.0)和 45.5 个月(5.0-112.0)。DCRT 组患者治疗后 1 个月,临床完全缓解率达到 97.7%(43 例)。手术组和 DCRT 组的 5 年 OS 率分别为 75.8%和 68.8%(p=0.135),5 年 PFS 率分别为 63.8%和 57.8%(p=0.637)。两组局部复发率相同(11.4%和 11.4%),但 DCRT 组远处转移率较低(n=1,2.27%比 n=29,12.15%)。DCRT 组有 11 例(25%)出现 3-4 级血液学毒性,手术组有 56 例(23.5%)出现 3-5 级手术并发症,包括死亡(n=5)。

结论

根据非劣效生存率、复发模式和并发症率,不考虑严重手术死亡率,DCRT 与 cT1bN0 食管鳞癌的根治性食管切除术相当。

相似文献

1
Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.临床 T1bN0M0 期食管鳞癌患者行根治性放化疗与手术治疗的对比:一项回顾性研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Sep;162:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
2
Comparison of transthoracic esophagectomy with definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who could tolerate transthoracic esophagectomy.对于能够耐受经胸段食管癌切除术的食管鳞状细胞癌患者,比较经胸段食管癌切除术与根治性放化疗作为初始治疗方法的效果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1866-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4337-7. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
3
Long-term outcomes of multimodal therapy combining definitive chemoradiotherapy and salvage surgery for T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.多模态治疗(包括根治性放化疗和挽救性手术)治疗 T4 期食管鳞癌的长期疗效。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;25(4):552-560. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01590-z. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
Endoscopic findings suggestive of a high risk of non-radical cure after definitive chemoradiotherapy for cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜检查结果提示 cT1bN0M0 期食管鳞癌根治性放化疗后非根治性治愈的风险较高。
Esophagus. 2023 Jul;20(3):541-547. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-00999-w. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
5
Evaluation of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radical Esophagectomy in Clinical T1bN0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.评估 T1bN0M0 期食管鳞癌患者行根治性放化疗与根治性手术的疗效。
World J Surg. 2021 Jun;45(6):1835-1844. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06016-4. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
Survival outcome of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients >75 years of age.75 岁以上可切除食管鳞癌患者行食管切除术和放化疗的生存结局。
Thorac Cancer. 2024 Jul;15(21):1656-1664. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15329. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Patient selection for salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性放化疗后挽救性手术治疗食管鳞癌的患者选择。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Sep;405(6):767-776. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01935-7. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Comparison of long-term outcomes between radical esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.临床T1bN0M0期食管鳞状细胞癌患者行根治性食管切除术与根治性放化疗的长期疗效比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Nov;11(11):4654-4662. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.31.
9
Esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with clinical stage N0 and pathological stage T1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after endoscopic submucosal dissection: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Ad-ESD Trial).内镜黏膜下剥离术后临床 N0 期和病理 T1b 期食管鳞癌患者行食管切除术与根治性放化疗的对比:一项多中心随机对照研究(Ad-ESD 试验)方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04461-5.
10
Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer : Outcomes and patterns of failure.新辅助放化疗与根治性放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌:结局和失败模式。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Feb;194(2):116-124. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1211-0. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Involved-field irradiation or elective-nodal irradiation in neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally-advanced esophageal cancer: comprehensive analysis for dosimetry, treatment-related complications, impact on lymphocyte, patterns of failure and survival.局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗中累及野照射或选择性淋巴结照射:剂量学、治疗相关并发症、对淋巴细胞的影响、失败模式及生存情况的综合分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 10;13:1274924. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1274924. eCollection 2023.
2
Efficacy of endoscopic therapy for T1b esophageal cancer and construction of prognosis prediction model: a retrospective cohort study.内镜治疗 T1b 期食管癌的疗效及预后预测模型的构建:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jun 1;109(6):1708-1719. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000427.
3
Patterns of care and prognostic evaluation for stage I-III upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.I-III期食管上段鳞状细胞癌的治疗模式与预后评估:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Nov;10(22):1222. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4577.
4
Therapeutic strategies following endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1a-MM/T1b-SM1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparisons of long-term outcomes with propensity score-matched analysis.内镜下黏膜下剥离术后治疗T1a-MM/T1b-SM1期食管鳞状细胞癌的策略:倾向评分匹配分析的长期结果比较
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1761-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09683-z. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
5
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Safety Analysis of Superficial Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive or Adjuvant Radiotherapy.接受根治性或辅助性放疗的浅表食管癌患者的长期临床结局及安全性分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;14(14):3423. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143423.