Zhang Pei, Zhang Mengdie, Ma Rui, Wei Jingxuan, Bao Yuwen, Zhang Lingli, Qian Xiaodan, Su Dan, Li Xin
Department of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Science and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Health Policy, School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
J Glob Health. 2025 May 9;15:04121. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04121.
Cancer is a leading cause of death globally, with China accounting for a significant portion of new cases and deaths. The Government of China has introduced the National Drug Price Negotiation (NDPN) policy to mitigate the high costs of anticancer drugs, especially multi-indication drugs, aimed at improving patient access to effective treatments.
In this retrospective study, we examined 24 multi-indication anticancer drugs for solid tumours included in the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) between 2016 and 2023. We collected characteristics of indication, clinical trial evidence, and clinical benefits of these drugs, calculated monthly drug costs, and assessed the associations the two by regression and correlation analyses.
We observed a significant reduction in the median monthly drug cost from USD 3863.08 before NDPN to USD 732.91 after their inclusion in the NRDL. However, the correlation analyses showed no significant relationships between drug costs and characteristics of indications, clinical trial evidence, and clinical benefits, while American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework scores demonstrated a negative correlation with costs, indicating that pricing may not accurately reflect clinical benefits.
While we found that the NDPN policy has significantly reduced drug costs, we did not observe a significant correlation between costs and specific characteristics. This highlights a need for a more transparent pricing mechanism linked to clinical efficacy to improve the accessibility and affordability of cancer therapies that effectively balance the interests of pharmaceutical companies, patients, and health insurance funds.
癌症是全球主要的死亡原因之一,中国的新发病例和死亡人数占很大比例。中国政府出台了国家药品价格谈判(NDPN)政策,以减轻抗癌药物,特别是多适应症药物的高昂成本,旨在改善患者获得有效治疗的机会。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们考察了2016年至2023年期间纳入国家医保药品目录(NRDL)的24种用于实体瘤的多适应症抗癌药物。我们收集了这些药物的适应症特征、临床试验证据和临床获益情况,计算了每月药品成本,并通过回归和相关性分析评估了两者之间的关联。
我们观察到,每月药品成本中位数从国家药品价格谈判前的3863.08美元大幅降至纳入国家医保药品目录后的732.91美元。然而,相关性分析显示,药品成本与适应症特征、临床试验证据和临床获益之间没有显著关系,而美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架评分与成本呈负相关,这表明定价可能无法准确反映临床获益。
虽然我们发现国家药品价格谈判政策显著降低了药品成本,但我们并未观察到成本与特定特征之间存在显著相关性。这凸显了需要一种与临床疗效相关的更透明的定价机制,以提高癌症治疗的可及性和可负担性,从而有效平衡制药公司、患者和医疗保险基金的利益。