• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较残疾登记前后的连续性护理:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparing continuity of care before and after disability registration: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Piao Zhaoyan, Choi Heekyoung, Jeon Boyoung, Han Euna

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, 162-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, South Korea.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, 100 ilsan-ro ilsan-donggu Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 10444, South Korea.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Jul 4;37(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045
PMID:40338644
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persons with disabilities often encounter barriers in accessing healthcare services. However, research on the impact of disability on the continuity of care (COC) remains limited. We assessed the changes in COC among disabled individuals to monitor alterations in their healthcare accessibility.

METHODS

This study used the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2.0 DB. The Bice-Boxerman COC Index (COCI; 0-1 range; higher values indicate greater COC) was used, with disability status of the participants determined from the registered data. Propensity-score matching was conducted for the control group. Difference-in-difference analysis was conducted to evaluate pre- and post-disability changes in COC for people with disabilities relative to those without.

RESULTS

COCI values were analyzed for 9702 participants with disabilities and 19 404 control individuals. On average, the disability group scored 0.0343 lower than the control group 1 year before disability registration (P = .001) relative to the disability registration year. Similar results were obtained for the physical disability, visual disability, and hearing disability subgroups, with scores of -0.0342, -0.0394, and -0.0285, respectively (P < .0001 for all groups). On the other hand, the neurological disability subgroup showed a marginal change in the COCI score, peaking 2 years before disability registration (-0.0757, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Individuals with physical, visual, and hearing disabilities showed low COCI scores, with a significant decline occurring 1 year before disability registration. In contrast, the control group showed no change in COC. This result highlights the need to improve healthcare continuity, particularly for individuals with the respective disabilities.

摘要

背景

残疾人在获得医疗服务时常常遇到障碍。然而,关于残疾对医疗连续性(COC)影响的研究仍然有限。我们评估了残疾个体的医疗连续性变化,以监测其医疗可及性的改变。

方法

本研究使用了国民健康保险服务-全国样本队列2.0数据库。采用比塞-博克斯曼医疗连续性指数(COCI;范围为0至1;分数越高表明医疗连续性越好),根据登记数据确定参与者的残疾状况。对对照组进行倾向得分匹配。进行差异分析以评估残疾人相对于非残疾人在残疾前后医疗连续性的变化。

结果

对9702名残疾参与者和19404名对照个体的COCI值进行了分析。平均而言,在残疾登记前1年,残疾组的得分相对于残疾登记年份比对照组低0.0343(P = 0.001)。身体残疾、视力残疾和听力残疾亚组也得到了类似结果,得分分别为-0.0342、-0.0394和-0.0285(所有组P < 0.0001)。另一方面,神经残疾亚组的COCI得分变化较小,在残疾登记前2年达到峰值(-0.0757,P < 0.0001)。

结论

身体、视力和听力残疾个体的COCI得分较低,在残疾登记前1年出现显著下降。相比之下,对照组的医疗连续性没有变化。这一结果凸显了改善医疗连续性的必要性,特别是对于患有相应残疾的个体。

相似文献

1
Comparing continuity of care before and after disability registration: a retrospective cohort study.比较残疾登记前后的连续性护理:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Jul 4;37(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045.
2
Return to Running After Achilles Tendon Repair: How Do US Navy Service Members' Physical Readiness Tests Change After Undergoing an Achilles Tendon Repair?跟腱修复术后恢复跑步:美国海军现役军人接受跟腱修复术后其身体准备测试有何变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003590.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
6
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Continuity of care and medication adherence in patients with angina: a retrospective cohort study using Korea's National Health Insurance data.心绞痛患者的连续性护理与药物依从性:一项使用韩国国民健康保险数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e098903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098903.
9
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
10
Yoga for chronic non-specific low back pain.瑜伽治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 18;11(11):CD010671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010671.pub3.