Pratt Madeline C, Goymer Hannah, Burgan Kaylee, Matthews Lynn T, Johnson Bernadette, Phillips Desiree, Kempf Mirjam-Colette, Mugavero Michael J, Williams Audra, Elopre Latesha E
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251331714. doi: 10.1177/17455057251331714. Epub 2025 May 8.
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is low among Southern, Black cis-gender women (CGW). Gynecology clinics are well-positioned to integrate PrEP services as a component of sexual and reproductive healthcare for CGW.
Identify key determinants to PrEP implementation into routine gynecologic care.
Qualitative, in-depth interviews (IDIs).
We conducted IDIs with key informants (i.e., physicians, nurses, medical assistants) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients accessing care in a gynecology clinic serving under- and uninsured women in Alabama. IDIs explored individual-, setting-, and process-level factors that may impact PrEP care implementation in a clinic serving approximately 3000 women yearly, 64% of whom are Black women.
Ten key informants participated in individual IDIs (median age 33.5, range 24-58 years, 80% female); 20 women participated in either 1 of 4 FGDs ( = 8) or an individual IDI ( = 12); median age 32, range 19-44. The following themes emerged: (1) patient- and provider-level stigmas related to sexuality, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and HIV limit discussions about sexual health and HIV prevention. (2) Providers report limited knowledge about prescribing and monitoring PrEP, which is reflected in patient's observations that providers do not routinely initiate discussions about HIV prevention or PrEP. (3) Providers utilize a more risk-based approach to PrEP counseling; patients expect non-targeted, comprehensive sexual health information. (4) Structural and social barriers will be challenges to implementing PrEP in routine gynecological care. (5) Patients and providers support a clinic-wide approach to integration of PrEP into gynecology clinics.
Discussions around sexual health and STIs are limited in routine gynecologic care, but patients expect comprehensive counseling from knowledgeable providers. Additional provider training may increase comfort discussing and providing PrEP. These findings will inform development of implementation strategies to integrate PrEP care into gynecologic services.
在南方的黑人顺性别女性(CGW)中,艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用率较低。妇科诊所具备将PrEP服务纳入CGW性与生殖健康保健组成部分的良好条件。
确定将PrEP纳入常规妇科护理的关键决定因素。
定性深入访谈(IDI)。
我们对关键信息提供者(即医生、护士、医疗助理)进行了IDI,并与在阿拉巴马州一家为低收入和未参保女性提供服务的妇科诊所就诊的患者进行了焦点小组讨论(FGD)。IDI探讨了可能影响在一家每年为约3000名女性提供服务(其中64%为黑人女性)的诊所实施PrEP护理的个人、环境和过程层面的因素。
10名关键信息提供者参与了个人IDI(中位年龄33.5岁,范围24 - 58岁,80%为女性);20名女性参与了4个FGD中的1个(n = 8)或个人IDI(n = 12);中位年龄32岁,范围19 - 44岁。出现了以下主题:(1)与性取向、性传播感染(STI)和艾滋病毒相关的患者及提供者层面的耻辱感限制了关于性健康和艾滋病毒预防的讨论。(2)提供者报告在开具和监测PrEP方面知识有限,这反映在患者的观察中,即提供者没有常规启动关于艾滋病毒预防或PrEP的讨论。(3)提供者在PrEP咨询中采用更多基于风险的方法;患者期望获得非针对性的全面性健康信息。(4)结构和社会障碍将是在常规妇科护理中实施PrEP的挑战。(5)患者和提供者支持在整个诊所将PrEP纳入妇科诊所的方法。
在常规妇科护理中,关于性健康和STI的讨论有限,但患者期望从知识渊博的提供者那里获得全面咨询。额外的提供者培训可能会增加讨论和提供PrEP的舒适度。这些发现将为制定将PrEP护理纳入妇科服务的实施策略提供信息。