• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速上皮脱离角膜交联联合保留中央上皮岛治疗旁中心进行性圆锥角膜:一项对比临床试验

Accelerated Epithelium-off Corneal Cross-linking With Preservation of a Central Epithelial Island in the Management of Paracentral Progressive Keratoconus: A Comparative Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Khalil Ahmad S, Khedr Marwa A M, Gad Ahmed A M, Ali Ali Goda

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2025 May;41(5):e492-e500. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250409-01. Epub 2025 May 1.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20250409-01
PMID:40340672
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) while preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea compared to epithelium removal CXL in cases of paracentral keratoconus.

METHODS

In this prospective comparative study, 140 eyes of 77 patients were randomized to receive either A-CXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium or A-CXL with removal of whole corneal epithelium over a central disk area with a diameter of 9 mm. Patients were observed regularly for 1 year after the procedure. The primary outcome measures were to compare early uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal haze, pain, and discomfort in the first week between the two groups. The secondary outcome measure was keratoconus progression after 12 months of follow-up, measured by the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding early postoperative CDVA, corneal haze, pain, and discomfort, with more favorable results in the ACXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium group. At 12 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, and Kmax was noticed among patients of the same group, with better final vision and a reduction in Kmax as compared to the preoperative values.

CONCLUSIONS

Preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea during A-CXL in cases with paracentral keratoconus can provide the benefits of immediate early postoperative visual rehabilitation, less corneal haze, less pain, good efficacy, and prevention of keratoconus progression. .

摘要

目的

评估在周边圆锥角膜病例中,与去除上皮的角膜交联术(CXL)相比,保留角膜中央3mm上皮的加速角膜交联术(A-CXL)的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项前瞻性对照研究中,77例患者的140只眼睛被随机分为两组,一组接受保留角膜中央3mm上皮的A-CXL,另一组接受去除直径9mm中央盘状区域全层角膜上皮的A-CXL。术后对患者进行为期1年的定期观察。主要观察指标是比较两组术后第一周的早期未矫正远视力(UDVA)、矫正远视力(CDVA)、角膜混浊、疼痛和不适情况。次要观察指标是随访12个月后圆锥角膜的进展情况,通过最大角膜曲率(Kmax)值来衡量。

结果

两组在术后早期的CDVA、角膜混浊、疼痛和不适方面存在显著差异,保留角膜中央3mm上皮的A-CXL组效果更佳。随访12个月时,同一组患者的UDVA、CDVA和Kmax均有显著改善,与术前相比,最终视力更好,Kmax降低。

结论

在周边圆锥角膜病例的A-CXL过程中保留角膜中央3mm的上皮,可以带来术后早期视力即刻恢复、角膜混浊减轻、疼痛减轻、疗效良好以及预防圆锥角膜进展等益处。

相似文献

1
Accelerated Epithelium-off Corneal Cross-linking With Preservation of a Central Epithelial Island in the Management of Paracentral Progressive Keratoconus: A Comparative Clinical Trial.加速上皮脱离角膜交联联合保留中央上皮岛治疗旁中心进行性圆锥角膜:一项对比临床试验
J Refract Surg. 2025 May;41(5):e492-e500. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250409-01. Epub 2025 May 1.
2
Assessment of the Predictive Ability of Theranostics for Corneal Cross-linking in Treating Keratoconus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.治疗圆锥角膜的光疗角膜交联术疗效预测的评估:一项随机临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2024 Dec;131(12):1403-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.06.012. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment.美国角膜交联治疗圆锥角膜多中心临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1259-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.052. Epub 2017 May 7.
4
Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cm) corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: a 24-month follow-up.加速(9mW/cm)角膜胶原交联术治疗进行性圆锥角膜的有效性和安全性:24 个月随访。
Eye (Lond). 2019 May;33(5):812-818. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0323-9. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Prospective two-year study of clinical outcomes following epithelium-off pulsed versus continuous accelerated corneal crosslinking for keratoconus.前瞻性研究:对于圆锥角膜患者,行去上皮的脉冲式与连续式加速角膜交联术两年后的临床效果。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;47(8):980-986. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13567. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Prospective Objective Analysis of Corneal Haze Following Customized Transepithelial PRK Without Mitomycin C Combined With Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Versus Corneal Cross-Linking Alone.定制化经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)联合加速角膜交联术与单纯角膜交联术治疗后角膜雾状混浊的前瞻性客观分析
J Refract Surg. 2024 Sep;40(9):e583-e594. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240715-03. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
7
Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal cross-linking for the treatment of progressive keratoconus: a randomized controlled trial.经上皮与上皮下角膜交联治疗进行性圆锥角膜的随机对照试验
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 May;159(5):821-8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
The 7-Year Outcomes of Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-linking in Progressive Keratoconus.进行性圆锥角膜上皮去除角膜交联术的7年随访结果
J Refract Surg. 2018 Mar 1;34(3):181-186. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180123-01.
9
Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.经上皮角膜交联与角膜上皮瓣下角膜交联治疗进行性圆锥角膜的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 23;3(3):CD013512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013512.pub2.
10
Prospective, randomized contralateral eye study of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus.小儿圆锥角膜加速与传统角膜交联的前瞻性、随机对侧眼研究
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 May;39(5):971-979. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0898-y. Epub 2018 Mar 21.