Suppr超能文献

鞘内注射氢吗啡酮与腹横肌平面阻滞用于上腹部手术:一项倾向评分匹配研究

Intrathecal hydromorphone vs. transversus abdominis plane block for upper abdominal surgery: a propensity score-matching study.

作者信息

Huang Yue-Xin, Chen Yu, Wang Wei, Li Ting-Ting, Ding Lin, Gao Fang, Zou Xiao-Chuan, Liu Fei

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 8;25(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03107-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multimodal analgesia is vital for enhanced recovery after upper-abdominal surgery. While both Intrathecal hydromorphone (ITH) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are widely applied in upper-abdominal surgery, evidence comparing the two techniques remains limited. This retrospective study employs a propensity score-matching (PSM) design to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of TAP block and ITH in upper-abdominal surgeries.

METHODS

PSM analysis was performed to minimize differences in baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was defined as the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain during movement within 24 h (hr) postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain at rest or during movement at different times within 72 h postoperatively, numerical rating scale score (NRS) score at rest or during movement within 72 h, complications, morphine equivalent, and indicators of postoperative rehabilitation.

RESULTS

Among the 182 patients analyzed after PSM, patients in the ITH group presented a lower incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement at 24 h after surgery (TAP vs. ITH, 44.0% vs. 27.5%; p = 0.02) compared to the TAP group. However, the median NRS of patients in the ITH group at rest at 48 and 72 h after surgery was higher (48 h: TAP vs. ITH, 0 vs. 1; p = 0.01) (72 h: TAP vs. ITH, 0 vs. 1; p = 0.01) than that of patients in the TAP group. Pruritus within the first 24 h after surgery occurred more frequently in the ITH group (TAP vs. ITH, 6.6% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001). The first flatus occurred earlier in the TAP group (TAP vs. ITH, 57.0 h vs. 68.0 h; p = 0.03). The first-day morphine equivalent was significantly lower in the ITH group (TAP vs. ITH, 15.0 mg vs. 12.3 mg; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that ITH was better at reducing the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain during movement within the first day after surgery. These findings suggest that ITH could be an effective choice for upper abdominal surgery. Further validation through randomized controlled trials (RCT) is required to establish optimal pain management protocols.

摘要

背景

多模式镇痛对于上腹部手术后的加速康复至关重要。虽然鞘内注射氢吗啡酮(ITH)和腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞在上腹部手术中均被广泛应用,但比较这两种技术的证据仍然有限。本回顾性研究采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)设计来评估TAP阻滞和ITH在上腹部手术中的镇痛效果。

方法

进行PSM分析以尽量减少基线特征的差异。主要结局定义为术后24小时内活动时中重度疼痛的发生率。次要结局包括术后72小时内不同时间静息或活动时中重度疼痛的发生率、72小时内静息或活动时的数字评分量表(NRS)评分、并发症、吗啡当量以及术后康复指标。

结果

在PSM分析后的182例患者中,ITH组患者术后24小时活动时中重度疼痛的发生率低于TAP组(TAP组 vs. ITH组,44.0% vs. 27.5%;p = 0.02)。然而,ITH组患者术后48小时和72小时静息时的NRS中位数高于TAP组(48小时:TAP组 vs. ITH组,0 vs. 1;p = 0.01)(72小时:TAP组 vs. ITH组,0 vs. 1;p = 0.01)。ITH组术后24小时内瘙痒的发生率更高(TAP组 vs. ITH组,6.6% vs. 29.7%;p < 0.001)。TAP组首次排气时间更早(TAP组 vs. ITH组,57.0小时 vs. 68.0小时;p = 0.03)。ITH组首日吗啡当量显著更低(TAP组 vs. ITH组,15.0毫克 vs. 12.3毫克;p = 0.01)。

结论

本研究表明ITH在降低术后第一天活动时中重度疼痛的发生率方面效果更好。这些发现提示ITH可能是上腹部手术的有效选择。需要通过随机对照试验(RCT)进一步验证以建立最佳疼痛管理方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f74b/12060365/04048d6b7fdd/12871_2025_3107_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验