Baguley Danielle A, Evans Gareth S, Bard Delphine, Monks Paul S, Cordell Rebecca L
University of Leicester, University Rd, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
University of Northumbria, College Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1038/s41370-025-00778-y.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a technique by which materials are continually added in layers to form structures. The technique has grown in popularity over the past decade and affordable desktop 3D printers are now widely used in schools, universities, businesses, and hospitals.
Understanding the types of chemical emissions from these 3D printers and their potential health effects is essential to safely use this technology.
A scoping literature review on volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from resin-bed and filament 3D printers has been conducted. Most of the published research has focused on emissions from filament 3D printers.
VOC emissions from resin 3D printers have been reported mostly as carbonyl compounds or methacrylate monomers. Filament VOC emissions are more varied in composition reflecting the constituents in the filaments used in this printer. The published research reported that the airborne concentrations of specific VOCs from 3D desktop printers fell below the HSE British workplace exposure limits (WELs). This may suggest that VOC emissions from these printers do not present a risk to occupational health. However, caution is required in reaching this conclusion because most of these studies quantified specific VOC emissions using methods different to those required by workplace regulatory standards. Other exposure circumstances, such as the effect of total VOC emissions, need to be considered, particularly for vulnerable groups, including individuals with respiratory disease, the elderly, or young children. Variables that could increase exposure and risks to health include long print times, multiple 3D printers, and poor ventilation. Research on the VOC emissions from resin 3D printers is required using experimental emission chambers.
The research discussed in this review focused on VOC emissions from desktop 3D printers and the potential health impacts associated with exposure to these compounds. The review identifies circumstances when people may be exposed to 3D printer emissions for which no regulatory exposure limits apply. This circumstance is especially relevant to people working in small businesses and organisations and to vulnerable people, such as the young, elderly and those with pre-existing lung disease. Raising awareness of these potential health concerns from 3D printer emissions can help to inform actions to mitigate exposure, through policy and behavioural changes, as well as engineering control measures. To our knowledge, this is the first review discussing studies of VOC emission from resin and popular filament 3D printers, including exposure risks and health outcomes.
三维(3D)打印是一种通过逐层连续添加材料来形成结构的技术。在过去十年中,该技术越来越受欢迎,价格实惠的桌面3D打印机现在广泛应用于学校、大学、企业和医院。
了解这些3D打印机的化学排放类型及其潜在的健康影响对于安全使用这项技术至关重要。
对树脂床和丝状3D打印机的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)排放进行了范围界定文献综述。大多数已发表的研究都集中在丝状3D打印机的排放上。
树脂3D打印机的VOC排放主要报告为羰基化合物或甲基丙烯酸酯单体。丝状VOC排放的成分更加多样,反映了该打印机中使用的丝材成分。已发表的研究报告称,3D桌面打印机中特定VOC的空气浓度低于英国健康与安全执行局(HSE)的工作场所接触限值(WELs)。这可能表明这些打印机的VOC排放不会对职业健康构成风险。然而,得出这一结论时需要谨慎,因为这些研究大多使用与工作场所监管标准要求不同的方法来量化特定VOC排放。需要考虑其他暴露情况,例如总VOC排放的影响,特别是对于弱势群体,包括患有呼吸系统疾病的人、老年人或幼儿。可能增加暴露和健康风险的变量包括长时间打印、多台3D打印机以及通风不良。需要使用实验排放室对树脂3D打印机的VOC排放进行研究。
本综述中讨论的研究聚焦于桌面3D打印机的VOC排放以及与接触这些化合物相关的潜在健康影响。该综述确定了人们可能接触到3D打印机排放但无监管接触限值适用的情况。这种情况尤其适用于在小企业和组织中工作的人员以及弱势群体,如年轻人、老年人和患有肺部疾病的人。提高对3D打印机排放这些潜在健康问题的认识有助于通过政策和行为改变以及工程控制措施来指导减轻暴露的行动。据我们所知,这是第一篇讨论树脂和常见丝状3D打印机VOC排放研究的综述,包括暴露风险和健康结果。