Majrashi Abdulrahman, Gue Ying X, Shantsila Alena, Williams Stella, Smith Catrin Tudur, Lip Gregory Y H, Pettitt Andrew R
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Emergency Medical Services, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025 Jun;13(3):e70113. doi: 10.1002/prp2.70113.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common form of leukemia in adults, characterized by the accumulation of dysfunctional lymphocytes. Ibrutinib, a first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has significantly improved CLL treatment but is associated with adverse cardiovascular events such as atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertension (HTN). Second-generation BTK inhibitors (BTKi) such as acalabrutinib were developed to have greater selectivity for BTK to reduce off-target effects and improve safety. Comparative real-world data between ibrutinib and second-generation BTKi are limited. This study analyzed data from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to compare cardiovascular outcomes in CLL patients who received ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The two groups were well-balanced using propensity score matching. The outcomes examined included new-onset AF, HTN, reported heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The incidence of AF/flutter was lower for acalabrutinib compared to ibrutinib [5.8% vs. 11.7%; HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.43-0.83); p = 0.002]. The incidence of HTN was also lower in the acalabrutinib cohort [15% vs. 26.3%; HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.53-0.81); p < 0.05]. The incidence of heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, bleeding events, or all-cause mortality did not differ after 3 years of treatment with acalabrutinib or ibrutinib, respectively. Our findings indicate that acalabrutinib has a more favorable cardiovascular toxicity profile compared to ibrutinib; therefore, validating the ELEVATE-RR trial in a real-world setting.
慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)是成人中最常见的白血病形式,其特征是功能失调的淋巴细胞积聚。第一代布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂伊布替尼显著改善了CLL的治疗,但与心房颤动(AF)和高血压(HTN)等不良心血管事件相关。第二代BTK抑制剂(BTKi)如阿卡替尼,对BTK具有更高的选择性,以减少脱靶效应并提高安全性。伊布替尼和第二代BTKi之间的比较真实世界数据有限。本研究分析了TriNetX全球合作网络的数据,以比较接受伊布替尼或阿卡替尼的CLL患者的心血管结局。使用倾向评分匹配使两组达到良好平衡。所检查的结局包括新发AF、HTN、报告的心力衰竭、室性心律失常、出血和全因死亡率。与伊布替尼相比,阿卡替尼的AF/扑动发生率更低[5.8%对11.7%;HR 0.59(95%CI 0.43 - 0.83);p = 0.002]。阿卡替尼队列中的HTN发生率也更低[15%对26.3%;HR 0.65(95%CI 0.53 - 0.81);p < 0.05]。分别用阿卡替尼或伊布替尼治疗3年后,心力衰竭、室性心律失常、出血事件或全因死亡率的发生率没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,与伊布替尼相比,阿卡替尼具有更有利的心血管毒性特征;因此,在真实世界环境中验证了ELEVATE - RR试验。