• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The psychology of a thank-you gift: Who gives it and why?感谢礼物的心理学:谁会送礼物以及为什么送?
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Jun;17(3):e70030. doi: 10.1111/aphw.70030.
2
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
An Examination of Perceived Stress and Emotion Regulation Challenges as Mediators of Associations Between Camouflaging and Internalizing Symptomatology.作为伪装与内化症状学之间关联的中介因素的感知压力和情绪调节挑战的考察
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):345-361. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0121. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.

本文引用的文献

1
Gratitude reduces consumption of depleting resources.感恩之心可减少资源消耗。
Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):1119-1123. doi: 10.1037/emo0000936. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
On thanksgiving: Cultural variation in gratitude demonstrations and perceptions between the United States and Taiwan.在感恩节:美国和台湾之间感恩表达和感知的文化差异。
Emotion. 2020 Oct;20(7):1185-1205. doi: 10.1037/emo0000662. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
3
The Grateful Don't Cheat: Gratitude as a Fount of Virtue.感恩不欺骗:感恩是美德的源泉。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jul;30(7):979-988. doi: 10.1177/0956797619848351. Epub 2019 May 30.
4
Ethnic variation in gratitude and well-being.感恩与幸福感的种族差异。
Emotion. 2020 Apr;20(3):518-524. doi: 10.1037/emo0000582. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
When Gratitude Evokes Indebtedness.当感激引发负债感时。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2019 Jul;11(2):286-303. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12155. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: A daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work.接受帮助者表示感谢的好处:工作中主动和被动帮助的日常调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Feb;104(2):197-213. doi: 10.1037/apl0000346. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
7
Half a Gift Is Not Half-Hearted: A Giver-Receiver Asymmetry in the Thoughtfulness of Partial Gifts.半份礼物并非不诚心:部分礼物的周到程度存在给予者-接受者的不对称性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Dec;43(12):1686-1695. doi: 10.1177/0146167217727003. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Reconsidering the roles of gratitude and indebtedness in social exchange.重新思考感激和感激之情在社会交换中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Jun;32(4):760-772. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1353484. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
The grateful are patient: Heightened daily gratitude is associated with attenuated temporal discounting.感恩的人更有耐心:每天感恩情绪的增强与时间折扣的减弱有关。
Emotion. 2016 Jun;16(4):421-5. doi: 10.1037/emo0000176. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
10
Exaggerated, mispredicted, and misplaced: when "it's the thought that counts" in gift exchanges.夸大、错误预测和错位:当“礼轻情意重”在礼物交换中。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):667-81. doi: 10.1037/a0029223. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

感谢礼物的心理学:谁会送礼物以及为什么送?

The psychology of a thank-you gift: Who gives it and why?

作者信息

Oishi Shigehiro, Lee Minha, Koo Minkyung, Cha Youngjae

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Jun;17(3):e70030. doi: 10.1111/aphw.70030.

DOI:10.1111/aphw.70030
PMID:40342235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12106001/
Abstract

Why do some people give a thank-you gift, while others do not? What are the predictors of thank-you gift-giving? We conducted three studies to examine the relative predictive values of indebtedness, gratitude, fondness, and respect in gift-giving. In Study 1 (N = 120), participants read two scenarios that depict two high school teachers and imagined how much gratitude, indebtedness, fondness, and respect they would feel toward each teacher and whether they would give a thank-you gift upon graduation. A multiple regression analysis showed that indebtedness was the only predictor of a thank-you gift. In Study 2 (N = 327, pre-registered), we directly replicated the results of Study 1. In Study 3 (N = 561, pre-registered), we asked participants to identify up to three high school teachers who wrote them recommendation letters and to state whether they gave them a thank-you gift. Replicating Studies 1 and 2, a multilevel analysis showed that indebtedness uniquely predicted whom participants gave a thank-you gift. A thank-you gift seems to be best predicted by the emotion of indebtedness.

摘要

为什么有些人会送感谢礼物,而有些人却不送呢?送感谢礼物的预测因素有哪些?我们进行了三项研究,以检验感恩、亏欠、喜爱和尊重在送礼行为中的相对预测价值。在研究1(N = 120)中,参与者阅读了两个描述高中教师的情景,并想象他们对每位教师会有多少感恩、亏欠、喜爱和尊重之情,以及他们在毕业后是否会送感谢礼物。多元回归分析表明,亏欠是送感谢礼物的唯一预测因素。在研究2(N = 327,预先注册)中,我们直接复制了研究1的结果。在研究3(N = 561,预先注册)中,我们要求参与者指出最多三位为他们写推荐信的高中教师,并说明他们是否给这些教师送了感谢礼物。重复研究1和2的结果,多层次分析表明,亏欠是参与者送感谢礼物对象的唯一预测因素。感谢礼物似乎最好由亏欠情绪来预测。