Suppr超能文献

LevaLap 1.0在腹腔镜接入过程中的上市后临床随访研究。

Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the LevaLap 1.0 during Laparoscopic Access.

作者信息

Deffieux Xavier, Benifla Jean-Louis, Juhasz-Böss Ingolf, Breitbach Moritz, Buchweitz Olaf, Habib Nassir, Hald Kirsten, Haj Hamoud Bashar, Huchon Cyrille, Lysdal Vibeke, Nigdelis Meletios P, Rudnicki Martin, Solomayer Erich-Franz, Taran Florin-Andrei, Michelsen-Wahl Henrik, Azziz Ricardo, Bagnardi Vincenzo, Hackethal Andreas

机构信息

Service de Gynécologie, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France. (Dr. Deffieux).

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France. (Drs. Benifla and Huchon).

出版信息

JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00014. Epub 2025 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The LevaLap 1.0 (Core Access Surgical Technologies, Atlanta, GA) was designed to promote safer, more stable, and more predictable abdominal access when using the Veress needle for insufflation. We report on the first postmarket clinical study (PMCF) assessing experience with the use of the LevaLap 1.0 during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter study, including women ≥18 years old, excluding pregnancy, access site surgery in prior 10 days, abdominal hernia, contraindication to Veress needle or laparoscopy use, body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m, and inability/unwillingness to provide consent.

RESULTS

A total of 158 subjects were included, involving nine surgeons. Mean age was 43.6 ± 14.6 years and mean BMI: 24.7 ± 3.8 kg/m. Access site was 83.5% transumbilical, 15.2% periumbilical, and 1.2% other. Using the device 96.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.8-99.0%, n = 152/157) of patients' access was successfully achieved at first attempt and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.5-100.0, n = 156/157) within the first 2 attempts. One minor device-related adverse event was reported: a circular redness on the skin at the site of device application, resolving spontaneously. Surgeons noted easier access in 59.5%, increased confidence in 68.3%, increased access control in 67.1%, and increased access efficiency in 66.4% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This PMCF study indicates that the use of the LevaLap 1.0 resulted in easier, greater control and greater efficiency during abdominal access using the Veress needle. In 96.8% access was achieved at first attempt and in 99.4% within the first 2 attempts. The use of the LevaLap 1.0 may facilitate abdominal access when using the Veress needle for insufflation.

摘要

背景与目的

LevaLap 1.0(核心通路手术技术公司,佐治亚州亚特兰大)旨在在使用韦雷斯针进行气腹时促进更安全、更稳定且更可预测的腹部穿刺。我们报告了第一项上市后临床研究(PMCF),评估在妇科腹腔镜手术中使用LevaLap 1.0的经验。

方法

前瞻性多中心研究,纳入年龄≥18岁的女性,排除妊娠、既往10天内有穿刺部位手术史、腹疝、韦雷斯针或腹腔镜使用的禁忌症、体重指数(BMI)>30 kg/m²以及无法/不愿意提供知情同意者。

结果

共纳入158名受试者,涉及9名外科医生。平均年龄为43.6±14.6岁,平均BMI为24.7±3.8 kg/m²。穿刺部位83.5%为经脐,15.2%为脐周,1.2%为其他部位。使用该设备,96.8%(95%置信区间[CI]:92.8 - 99.0%,n = 152/157)的患者首次穿刺成功,99.4%(95% CI:96.5 - 100.0,n = 156/157)在最初2次穿刺内成功。报告了1例与设备相关的轻微不良事件:设备应用部位皮肤出现圆形发红,自行消退。外科医生指出,在59.5%的病例中穿刺更容易,68.3%的病例中信心增强,67.1%的病例中穿刺控制增强,66.4%的病例中穿刺效率提高。

结论

这项PMCF研究表明,使用LevaLap 1.0在使用韦雷斯针进行腹部穿刺时可使穿刺更轻松、控制更好且效率更高。96.8%的患者首次穿刺成功,99.4%的患者在最初2次穿刺内成功。使用LevaLap 1.0在使用韦雷斯针进行气腹时可能有助于腹部穿刺。

相似文献

1
Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the LevaLap 1.0 during Laparoscopic Access.
JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00014. Epub 2025 May 8.
2
Laparoscopic entry techniques.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub3.
3
Heated insufflation with or without humidification for laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 19;10(10):CD007821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007821.pub3.
4
Laparoscopic entry techniques.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub2.
5
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
7
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
8
Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):CD012574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012574.pub2.
9
Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 21;6(6):CD009569. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009569.pub3.
10
Metformin for women who are overweight or obese during pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD010564. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010564.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Prospective Cohort Study Quantifying the Effect of the LevaLap 1.0 on the Distance between the Abdominal Wall and Intra-abdominal Viscera.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Sep;30(9):748-756. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets.
J Surg Res. 2023 Jan;281:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Decline in surgeon volume after successful implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: An undesired side effect?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):2082-2090. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Surgical Trend and Volume Effect on the Choice of Hysterectomy Benign Gynecologic Conditions.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Jan 30;10(1):1-9. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_68_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
7
Gender equity in ergonomics: does muscle effort in laparoscopic surgery differ between men and women?
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08295-3. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
8
Women in academic surgery over the last four decades.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0243308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243308. eCollection 2020.
9
Ob/Gyn resident self-perceived preparedness for minimally invasive surgery.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02090-9.
10
LapCap: A Novel Device to Reduce Entry Complications.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May-Jun;25(4):566-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.644. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验