• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人因工程学中的性别公平:腹腔镜手术中的肌肉用力在男性和女性之间是否存在差异?

Gender equity in ergonomics: does muscle effort in laparoscopic surgery differ between men and women?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, General Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986246 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-6246, USA.

Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08295-3. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08295-3
PMID:33492502
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women surgeons may experience more ergonomic challenges while performing surgery. We aimed to assess ergonomics between men and women surgeons.

METHODS

Laparoscopic surgeons from a single institution were enrolled. Demographics and intraoperative data were collected. Muscle groups were evaluated objectively using surface electromyography (EMG; TrignoTM, Delsys, Inc., Natick, MA), and comprised upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid, flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and extensor digitorum (ED). Comparisons were made between women (W) and men (M) for each muscle group, assessing maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and median frequency (MDF). The Piper Fatigue Scale-12 (PFS-12) was used to assess self-perceived fatigue. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v26.0, α = 0.05.

RESULTS

18 surgeries were recorded (W:8, M:10). Women had higher activation of UT (32% vs 23%, p < 0.001), FCR (33% vs 16%, p < 0.001), and ED (13% vs 10%, p < 0.001), and increased effort of ED (90.4 ± 18.13 Hz vs 99.1 ± 17.82 Hz). Comparisons were made between W and M for each muscle group, assessing MVC and MDF.

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for surgeon's height and duration of surgery, an increase in muscle activation was seen for women laparoscopic surgeons. Since poor ergonomics could be a major cause of work-related injuries, we must understand differences in ergonomics between men and women and evaluate which factors impact these variations.

摘要

背景

女性外科医生在手术过程中可能会遇到更多的人体工程学挑战。我们旨在评估男女外科医生之间的人体工程学差异。

方法

招募了来自一家机构的腹腔镜外科医生。收集了人口统计学和术中数据。使用表面肌电图(EMG;TrignoTM,Delsys,Inc.,Natick,MA)客观评估肌肉群,包括上斜方肌(UT)、三角肌前束、桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)和伸指肌(ED)。比较了女性(W)和男性(M)的每组肌肉,评估最大自主收缩(MVC)和中位频率(MDF)。使用 Piper 疲劳量表-12(PFS-12)评估自我感知疲劳。使用 SPSS v26.0 进行统计分析,α=0.05。

结果

记录了 18 例手术(W:8,M:10)。女性的 UT(32%对 23%,p<0.001)、FCR(33%对 16%,p<0.001)和 ED(13%对 10%,p<0.001)的激活更高,ED 的努力程度更高(90.4±18.13 Hz 对 99.1±17.82 Hz)。比较了 W 和 M 的每组肌肉,评估 MVC 和 MDF。

结论

在控制外科医生身高和手术持续时间后,女性腹腔镜外科医生的肌肉激活增加。由于不良的人体工程学可能是导致与工作相关的伤害的主要原因,我们必须了解男女之间的人体工程学差异,并评估哪些因素会影响这些差异。

相似文献

1
Gender equity in ergonomics: does muscle effort in laparoscopic surgery differ between men and women?人因工程学中的性别公平:腹腔镜手术中的肌肉用力在男性和女性之间是否存在差异?
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08295-3. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.微创外科的工效学:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术之间手术室肌肉用力与疲劳的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2323-2331. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6515-3. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
3
Ergonomics Analysis for Subjective and Objective Fatigue Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgical Skills Practice Among Surgeons.外科医生腹腔镜手术技能与机器人手术技能练习中主观和客观疲劳的人体工程学分析
Surg Innov. 2020 Feb;27(1):81-87. doi: 10.1177/1553350619887861. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术的人体工程学分析
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3379-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3604-9. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
5
Effect of Patient Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgical Ergonomics.患者体重指数对腹腔镜手术人体工程学的影响。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1709-1713. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03748-0.
6
Ergonomic analysis of primary and assistant surgical roles.主刀和助手手术角色的人体工程学分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.058. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Ergonomic differences in mesh placement and mesh fixation between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair with mesh.腹腔镜和机器人腹股沟疝修补术中网片的置入和固定的人机工程学差异。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2355-2365. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03168-9. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
8
Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels.不同经验水平下腹腔镜和机器人手术任务表现的人机工程学分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1938-1943. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6478-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.功能性腹腔镜技能(FLS)任务可作为区分腹腔镜手术和机器人手术人体工程学差异的指标。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3497-7. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术相关的身体和认知工效学的比较评估
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):456-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3213-z. Epub 2013 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Female Surgical Ergonomics in Otolaryngology.耳鼻喉科的女性手术人体工程学
Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jun;36(2):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.otot.2025.05.008. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
A Survey of Surgeon Interest in Individually Sized Laparoscopic Instruments.外科医生对个体化尺寸腹腔镜器械的兴趣调查。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Dec 19;14(2):165-169. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_6_24. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the LevaLap 1.0 during Laparoscopic Access.LevaLap 1.0在腹腔镜接入过程中的上市后临床随访研究。
JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00014. Epub 2025 May 8.
4
Ergonomic Challenges and Considerations in Endoscopic Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生内镜治疗中的人体工程学挑战与考量
Curr Urol Rep. 2025 Apr 15;26(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01266-4.
5
Using wearable technology for Posture Regulation to Improve Surgical Ergonomics in the paediatric operating room: the UPRISE trial: a pilot study.使用可穿戴技术进行姿势调节,以改善儿科手术室的手术人体工程学:UPRISE 试验:一项初步研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4445-4456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10933-5. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
6
Small Glove Size and Female Gender Are Associated with Greater Reported Difficulty Using Orthopaedic Instruments Among Residents.手套尺寸小和女性性别与住院医师使用骨科器械时报告的更大困难相关。
JB JS Open Access. 2024 May 22;9(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00151. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
7
Advances in objective assessment of ergonomics in endoscopic surgery: a review.内镜手术工效学客观评估的研究进展:综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1281194. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281194. eCollection 2023.
8
Female Surgical Ergonomics in Otolaryngology: A National Survey Study.耳鼻喉科女性手术工效学:全国调查研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Mar;170(3):788-794. doi: 10.1002/ohn.568. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
9
Surgical device design: do instruments fit today's surgeons?手术器械设计:如今的器械适合外科医生吗?
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Jul 14;5(1):e000159. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000159. eCollection 2023.
10
Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.外科医生的性别和人体测量学是否会影响传统腹腔镜手术中工具的可用性?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6640-6659. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10228-1. Epub 2023 Jul 11.