• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中国汉族男性中使用机器学习在不进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验的情况下预测单纯性糖耐量受损

Predicting isolated impaired glucose tolerance without oral glucose tolerance test using machine learning in Chinese Han men.

作者信息

Wang Lin, Xie Jing, Gu Zhaoyan, Miao Xinyu, Ma Lichao, Yan Shuangtong, Gong Yanping, Li Chunlin, Sun Banruo, Ruan Yue

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Second Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.

Department of Special Medical Service, Ninth Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 24;16:1514397. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1514397. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1514397
PMID:40343071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12058868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Isolated Impaired Glucose Tolerance (I-IGT) represents a specific prediabetic state that typically requires a standardized oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosis. This study aims to predict glucose tolerance status in Chinese Han men at fasting state using machine learning (ML) models with demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory data.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 1,117 Chinese Han men aged 50-87 years. Baseline variables including age, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), high blood pressure (HBP), body mass index (BMI), waist to hip ratio (WHR), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were collected from electronic medical records (EMRs) for machine learning model training and validation. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) were tested for machine learning model performance comparison. Model performance was evaluated using metrics including accuracy, recall, F1 score, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and confusion matrix plots were used for model interpretation.

RESULTS

The RF model demonstrated the best overall performance with a 96.7% accuracy, recall of 91.4%, F1 score of 95.7%, PPV of 99.1%, and NPV of 95.6%. The AUC values for the SVM, DT, RF, LR, KNN, NB, AdaBoost, and GBM models were 0.97, 0.92, 0.96, 0.97, 0.88, 0.88, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively. While the RF model showed strong overall performance, the LR model had the highest AUC, indicating superior discriminatory power. FPG was identified as the most important predictor for I-IGT, followed by HDL, TC, HBP, BMI, and WHR. Individuals with FPG levels higher than 5.1 mmol/L were more likely to have I-IGT; the performance metrics for this cut-off value were: 89.35% accuracy, 89.79% recall, 85.22% F1 score, 81.09% PPV, 94.38% NPV, and 0.95 AUC.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models based on demographic and clinical characteristics offer a cost-effective method for predicting I-IGT in Chinese Han men aged over 50, without the need for an OGTT. These models could complement existing early diagnostic strategies, thereby enhancing the early detection and prevention of diabetes. Additionally, FPG alone could serve as an efficient screening tool for the early identification of I-IGT in clinical settings.

摘要

背景

孤立性糖耐量受损(I-IGT)代表一种特定的糖尿病前期状态,通常需要标准化口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)来进行诊断。本研究旨在使用包含人口统计学、人体测量学和实验室数据的机器学习(ML)模型,预测中国汉族男性空腹状态下的糖耐量状况。

方法

研究人群包括1117名年龄在50 - 87岁的中国汉族男性。从电子病历(EMR)中收集基线变量,包括年龄、空腹血糖(FPG)、高血压(HBP)、体重指数(BMI)、腰臀比(WHR)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),用于机器学习模型的训练和验证。对支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)、K近邻(KNN)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、自适应提升(AdaBoost)和梯度提升机(GBM)进行测试,以比较机器学习模型的性能。使用包括准确率、召回率、F1分数、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)以及受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)等指标来评估模型性能。使用夏普利加性解释(SHAP)和混淆矩阵图进行模型解释。

结果

RF模型展现出最佳的总体性能,准确率为96.7%,召回率为91.4%,F1分数为95.7%,PPV为99.1%,NPV为95.6%。SVM、DT、RF、LR、KNN、NB、AdaBoost和GBM模型的AUC值分别为0.97、0.92、0.96、0.97、0.88、0.88、0.97和0.97。虽然RF模型总体性能强劲,但LR模型的AUC最高,表明其具有卓越的判别能力。FPG被确定为I-IGT最重要的预测指标,其次是HDL、TC、HBP、BMI和WHR。FPG水平高于5.1 mmol/L的个体更有可能患有I-IGT;该临界值的性能指标为:准确率89.35%,召回率89.79%,F1分数85.22%,PPV 81.09%,NPV 94.38%,AUC 0.95。

结论

基于人口统计学和临床特征的机器学习模型为预测50岁以上中国汉族男性的I-IGT提供了一种经济有效的方法,无需进行OGTT。这些模型可以补充现有的早期诊断策略,从而加强糖尿病的早期检测和预防。此外,单独的FPG可作为临床环境中早期识别I-IGT的有效筛查工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb36/12058868/cd5c0f212099/fendo-16-1514397-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb36/12058868/b98f49a16756/fendo-16-1514397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb36/12058868/cd5c0f212099/fendo-16-1514397-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb36/12058868/b98f49a16756/fendo-16-1514397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb36/12058868/cd5c0f212099/fendo-16-1514397-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting isolated impaired glucose tolerance without oral glucose tolerance test using machine learning in Chinese Han men.在中国汉族男性中使用机器学习在不进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验的情况下预测单纯性糖耐量受损
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 24;16:1514397. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1514397. eCollection 2025.
2
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
3
Study on risk factors of impaired fasting glucose and development of a prediction model based on Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm.基于极端梯度提升算法的空腹血糖受损风险因素研究及预测模型的建立。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 24;15:1368225. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1368225. eCollection 2024.
4
Prediction and feature selection of low birth weight using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测和选择低出生体重。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Oct 12;43(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00647-8.
5
Comparative assessment of the capability of machine learning-based radiomic models for predicting omental metastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer.基于机器学习的放射组学模型预测局部进展期胃癌网膜转移能力的比较评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 13;14(1):16208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66979-x.
6
Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白 A1c 联合用于糖尿病和糖调节受损的筛查。
Acta Diabetol. 2010 Sep;47(3):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00592-009-0143-2. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
7
Screening for diabetes with HbA1c: Test performance of HbA1c compared to fasting plasma glucose among Chinese, Malay and Indian community residents in Singapore.用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)筛查糖尿病:新加坡华族、马来族和印族社区居民中,与空腹血浆葡萄糖相比,HbA1c 的检测性能。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 20;8(1):12419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29998-z.
8
Development and validation of explainable machine-learning models for carotid atherosclerosis early screening.开发和验证可解释的机器学习模型,用于颈动脉粥样硬化的早期筛查。
J Transl Med. 2023 May 29;21(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04093-8.
9
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill children.用于危重症儿童弥散性血管内凝血早期预测的可解释机器学习模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91434-w.
10
Diagnostic values and appropriate cutoff points of lipid ratios in patients with abnormal glucose tolerance status: a cross-sectional study.异常糖耐受状态患者中血脂比值的诊断价值及合适截断点:一项横断面研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2019 Jun 1;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1070-z.

本文引用的文献

1
An update on chronic complications of diabetes mellitus: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies with a focus on metabolic memory.糖尿病慢性并发症的最新研究进展:从分子机制到治疗策略,重点关注代谢记忆。
Mol Med. 2024 May 26;30(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s10020-024-00824-9.
2
Global burden of type 2 diabetes attributable to non-high body mass index from 1990 to 2019.2019 年归因于非高身体质量指数的 2 型糖尿病全球负担。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):1338. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15585-z.
3
Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.
全球、地区和国家 1990 年至 2021 年糖尿病负担,以及对 2050 年患病率的预测:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2023 Jul 15;402(10397):203-234. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
4
Recent applications of machine learning and deep learning models in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of diabetes: a comprehensive review.机器学习和深度学习模型在糖尿病预测、诊断及管理中的最新应用:一项全面综述
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Dec 27;14(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00969-9.
5
Privacy-Preserving Multi-Class Support Vector Machine Model on Medical Diagnosis.基于隐私保护的医疗诊断多类支持向量机模型。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 Jul;26(7):3342-3353. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3157592. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Predicting Overall Survival Time in Glioblastoma Patients Using Gradient Boosting Machines Algorithm and Recursive Feature Elimination Technique.使用梯度提升机算法和递归特征消除技术预测胶质母细胞瘤患者的总生存时间
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 4;13(19):4976. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194976.
7
Association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and type 2 diabetes mellitus among Chinese: the Beijing longitudinal study of aging.中国人群高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与 2 型糖尿病的相关性:北京老龄化纵向研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2021 Jul 17;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01499-5.
8
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S15-S33. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S002.
9
Ada-WHIPS: explaining AdaBoost classification with applications in the health sciences.Ada-WHIPS:解释 AdaBoost 分类及其在健康科学中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01201-2.
10
Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study.中国 2018 年美国糖尿病协会诊断标准下的中国大陆糖尿病患病率:全国横断面研究。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m997.