Cohen-Zimerman Shira, Cristofori Irene, McNamara Patrick, Krueger Frank, Gordon Barry, Grafman Jordan
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Brain Injury Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 24;16:1488890. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1488890. eCollection 2025.
Attachment style shapes one's connections with important figures in their life. One such unique relationship is the connection to God (CTG), which may be shaped by attachment style. Stronger CTG has been associated with secure attachment, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. While previous research has implicated the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in CTG, findings have been mixed and may depend on attachment style-an idea that has yet to be directly tested. This study aimed to (1) examine whether individuals with a secure attachment style report higher levels of CTG compared to those with a non-secure attachment style, and (2) identify the brain regions associated with CTG in individuals with secure vs. non-secure attachment. We assessed attachment style and CTG in a sample of male combat veterans ( = 150), the majority of whom had focal traumatic brain injuries (pTBI; = 119). Brain imaging (CT scans) was also obtained. Behaviorally, after controlling for age, years of education, and brain volume loss, individuals with a secure attachment style reported stronger CTG. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping revealed that damage to the right orbitofrontal cortex was associated with stronger CTG in individuals with secure-but not insecure-attachment. These findings suggest that attachment style shapes CTG at both behavioral and neural levels. Moreover, they highlight the potential role of attachment style in TBI recovery, offering insights that could inform spiritually integrated therapeutic interventions and support strategies.
依恋风格塑造了一个人与生活中重要人物的关系。一种独特的关系是与上帝的联系(CTG),它可能受到依恋风格的影响。更强的CTG与安全型依恋有关,但这种关系背后的神经机制尚不清楚。虽然先前的研究表明前额叶皮层(PFC)与CTG有关,但研究结果不一,可能取决于依恋风格——这一观点尚未得到直接验证。本研究旨在:(1) 研究与非安全型依恋风格的个体相比,安全型依恋风格的个体是否报告更高水平的CTG;(2) 确定安全型与非安全型依恋个体中与CTG相关的脑区。我们在一个男性退伍军人样本(n = 150)中评估了依恋风格和CTG,其中大多数人患有局灶性创伤性脑损伤(pTBI;n = 119)。还进行了脑成像(CT扫描)。在行为层面,在控制了年龄、受教育年限和脑容量损失后,安全型依恋风格的个体报告了更强的CTG。基于体素的病变-症状映射显示,右侧眶额皮层受损与安全型(而非不安全型)依恋个体中更强的CTG相关。这些发现表明,依恋风格在行为和神经层面都塑造了CTG。此外,它们突出了依恋风格在创伤性脑损伤恢复中的潜在作用,提供了可用于指导精神整合治疗干预和支持策略的见解。