Suppr超能文献

男性对交易性行为三种不同衡量方式的理解:乌干达拉凯地区男性的认知访谈研究

Men's understanding of three different measures of transactional sex: A cognitive interviewing study among men in Rakai, Uganda.

作者信息

Nishimura Holly, Nakyanjo Neema, Gichane Waru, Ddaaki William, Kiyingi Anne, Mukwana Emmanuel, Nalugoda Fred, Ssekyewa Charles, Denison Julie, Grabowski M Kate, Kagaayi Joseph, Kennedy Caitlin E

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

Rakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2025 May 2:rs.3.rs-6465876. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6465876/v1.

Abstract

Lack of valid and reliable measures and inconsistent transactional sex (TS) measurement has resulted in poor understanding of the practice, particularly among men. To improve TS measurement and facilitate comparison across studies, we examined how men comprehend and respond to three common TS measures. We conducted cognitive interviews with 25 sexually active adult men in Rakai, Uganda from November 2021-February 2022 and thematically analysed the data. Most men responded affirmatively to the three TS measures, but there was variation in responses across measures. The two measures that assessed relationship motivation and gendered norms of material provision for sex showed better comprehension and consistency than the measure without these components. For these two measures, a substantial proportion of men responded affirmatively but provided explanations related to gendered expectations of material provision rather than describing provision in a specific relationship which was not the intent of the measures. The measure developed by Wamoyi and colleagues appeared to most accurately measure TS. Our findings support TS measures that include a clear statement of motivation and account for gendered norms of giving and receiving. Given heterogeneity in TS measurement, this study enhances our understanding of common TS measures.

摘要

缺乏有效且可靠的测量方法以及性交易(TS)测量的不一致,导致对这种行为的理解不足,尤其是在男性当中。为了改进TS测量并便于跨研究比较,我们研究了男性如何理解和回应三种常见的TS测量方法。2021年11月至2022年2月,我们在乌干达拉凯对25名性活跃成年男性进行了认知访谈,并对数据进行了主题分析。大多数男性对这三种TS测量方法的回答是肯定的,但不同测量方法的回答存在差异。评估关系动机和性别化的性交易物质提供规范的两种测量方法,比没有这些组成部分的测量方法表现出更好的理解度和一致性。对于这两种测量方法,相当一部分男性回答是肯定的,但给出的解释与性别化的物质提供期望有关,而不是描述特定关系中的物质提供情况,这并非测量方法的本意。Wamoyi及其同事开发的测量方法似乎最准确地测量了TS。我们的研究结果支持那些包括明确动机陈述并考虑到给予和接受的性别化规范的TS测量方法。鉴于TS测量的异质性,本研究增进了我们对常见TS测量方法的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/12060980/de158019ffa6/nihpp-rs6465876v1-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验