Boucly Athénaïs, Song Shanshan, Keles Merve, Wang Dennis, Howard Luke S, Humbert Marc, Sitbon Olivier, Lawrie Allan, Thompson A A Roger, Frank Philipp, Kivimaki Mika, Rhodes Christopher J, Wilkins Martin R
Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Hopital Bicetre, Service de Pneumologie, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, Île-de-France, France.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 May 9.
Patients with pulmonary hypertension are classified according to clinical criteria to inform treatment decisions. Knowledge of the molecular drivers of pulmonary hypertension might better inform treatment choice.
Between 2013 and 2021, 470 patients with pulmonary hypertension, 136 disease controls and 59 healthy controls were enrolled as a discovery cohort. Plasma levels of 7288 proteins were assayed (SomaScan 7K platform). Proteins that distinguished pulmonary hypertension from both control groups were selected for unsupervised clustering (k-means clustering of UMAP dimensions). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared across clusters. Separate cohorts of serially sampled patients from pulmonary hypertension centers in the United Kingdom (n=229) and France (n=79) provided independent validation.
156 plasma proteins that distinguished pulmonary hypertension from disease and healthy controls formed 4 clusters with diverse 5-year survival rates: 78% (cluster 4), 62% (cluster 2), 44% (cluster 3), and 33% (cluster 1). The distinction and clinical relevance of the clusters were confirmed in validation cohorts by their association with survival. To further characterise the therapeutic relevance of the clusters we investigated 2 experimental drug targets: the Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) pathway was up-regulated in cluster 3 compared to other clusters and the Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) pathway was up-regulated in cluster 1.
Plasma proteomic profiling of patients with pulmonary hypertension distinguishes 4 clusters, independent of the clinical classification. These groups, based on differential plasma protein levels, could act as theragnostic biomarkers for new therapies targeting PDGF and TGF-β pathways. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
肺动脉高压患者根据临床标准进行分类,以指导治疗决策。了解肺动脉高压的分子驱动因素可能会更好地指导治疗选择。
在2013年至2021年期间,纳入470例肺动脉高压患者、136例疾病对照者和59例健康对照者作为发现队列。检测了7288种蛋白质的血浆水平(SomaScan 7K平台)。选择能够区分肺动脉高压与两个对照组的蛋白质进行无监督聚类(UMAP维度的k均值聚类)。比较各聚类的临床特征和结局。来自英国(n=229)和法国(n=79)肺动脉高压中心的连续采样患者的独立队列提供了独立验证。
156种区分肺动脉高压与疾病及健康对照的血浆蛋白形成了4个聚类,其5年生存率各不相同:78%(聚类4)、62%(聚类2)、44%(聚类3)和33%(聚类1)。聚类的差异和临床相关性在验证队列中通过其与生存率的关联得到证实。为了进一步表征聚类的治疗相关性,我们研究了2个实验性药物靶点:与其他聚类相比,血小板衍生生长因子(PDGF)通路在聚类3中上调,转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)通路在聚类1中上调。
肺动脉高压患者的血浆蛋白质组学分析可区分出4个聚类,与临床分类无关。这些基于不同血浆蛋白水平的组可作为针对PDGF和TGF-β通路的新疗法的治疗诊断生物标志物。本文为开放获取文章,根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)分发。