Somé A Fabrice, Somé Anthony, Sougué Emmanuel, Ouédraogo Cheick Oumar W, Da Ollo, Dah S Rodrigue, Nikièma Frederic, Magalhaes Tereza, Gray Lyndsey I, Finical Will, Pugh Greg, Lado Paula, Randall Jenna C, Burton Timothy A, Ring Molly E, Leon Anna-Sophia, Colt McKenzie, Li Fangyong, Wang Kaicheng, Wade Martina, Lier Audun J, Richards Kacey, Sproch Hannah, Zhang Elizabeth, Ellman Julia, Achebe Ijeamaka, Jackson Conner L, Xiao Mengli, Wu Emma J, Bousema Teun, Slater Hannah C, Foy Brian D, Parikh Sunil, Dabiré Roch K
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale de l'Ouest, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Center for Vector-borne Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Jul;25(7):737-750. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00751-5. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
The success of crucial vector control efforts in Africa (eg, long-lasting insecticide-treated nets [ITNs] and indoor residual spraying) are threatened by widespread insecticide resistance and insufficient effect on outdoor mosquito biting. Studies have shown that ivermectin, used for the treatment of parasitic diseases, can kill malaria vectors that feed on the blood of treated people and thus might be an effective complementary vector control tool if administered widely to communities in malaria endemic regions. We aimed to test the safety of repeated, high-dose ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA) and its efficacy for reducing malaria incidence among children when integrated with seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) delivery.
We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cluster-randomised, parallel-group trial in southwest Burkina Faso over two consecutive rainy seasons (2019-20). 14 villages or village sectors (clusters) were randomly assigned (1:1) to ivermectin or placebo MDA by random draw, and study-eligible participants (those who regularly lived in the cluster and provided written informed consent) from all households were enrolled in July, 2019 and July, 2020. Participants were eligible for MDA if they were 90 cm in height or taller and not excluded for other safety reasons (eg, pregnancy or taking SMC drugs). There were no age restrictions for participants. Each rainy season (July to October), eligible participants from the intervention group clusters received monthly high-dose oral ivermectin MDA (three daily doses, approximately 300 μg/kg dosed by height bands) and those from the control group received monthly oral placebo MDA for up to eight treatment rounds. MDA was performed by study staff alongside community health worker administration of monthly SMC to children aged 3-59 months in both groups. All participants and study personnel, apart from the pharmacist, were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was weekly malaria incidence in children aged 10 years and younger, as assessed by weekly active case detection until week 16 of year 2, by intention to treat. Adverse events were monitored in all MDA participants through active and passive surveillance. Blood was sampled for secondary parasitological outcomes, including analysis of parasite species distribution among malaria cases. Mosquitoes were sampled from pre-selected households in three clusters per group for secondary entomological outcomes, including analysis of blood-fed mosquito survivorship, mosquito biting rates, and entomological inoculation rates. Changes in haemoglobin pre-intervention and post-intervention in children aged 10 years and younger were assessed in 2020. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03967054) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACT201907479787308) and is completed.
The study took place from July 13, 2019, to Nov 8, 2020, with seven villages assigned to the control group and seven to the intervention group. Participants were enrolled from households in both groups in July, 2019, and July, 2020. In the intervention group, 1928 participants in 2019 and 2163 participants in 2020 were followed up, and 703 children in 2019 and 686 children in 2020 were analysed. In the control group, 1604 participants in 2019 and 1921 participants in 2020 were followed up, and 605 children in 2019 and 641 children in 2020 were analysed. MDA coverage (receiving ≥1 dose) in the enrolled population (including those who were ineligible) varied over the intervention period (68-74%), with 86-95% of participants who were eligible receiving ivermectin or placebo over the study period. 288 (47·2%) of 610 children in the control group and 312 (44·2%) of 706 children in the ivermectin group received SMC, and all clusters received new dual-chemistry Interceptor G2 ITNs containing chlorfenapyr and α-cypermethrin by government authorities in October, 2019. The average estimated weekly malaria incidence rate per 100 person-weeks among children in the intervention group was 1·78 (95% CI 1·24-2·53) and 1·84 (1·29-2·64) in the control group, and the incidence rate ratio was 0·96 (95% CI 0·58-1·59; p=0·8723). The risk of adverse events among eligible participants in the intervention group was lower than in the control group (risk ratio 0·63, 95% CI 0·46-0·87; p=0·0049). The distribution of Plasmodium spp detected in children with clinical malaria was unexpectedly diverse with non-Plasmodium falciparum species detected in 56 (11%) of 505 symptomatic children; however, species distribution did not differ between groups (p=0·15). Blood-fed Anopheles gambiae species complex mosquitoes captured in intervention group clusters the week after MDA in 2019 had decreased survival relative to those captured from control group clusters (p<0·0001), but this effect was not seen in mosquitoes captured 3 weeks after MDA. Overall entomological inoculation rates (EIRs; infectious bites per person per night) did not differ between groups (intervention EIR 0·010; control EIR 0·011; between-group ratio 0·91, 95% CI 0·56-1·30; p=0·45). In 2020, children aged 10 years and younger in the intervention group had a significantly higher increase in haemoglobin pre-intervention versus post-intervention than children in the control group (p=0·007).
Repeated high-dose ivermectin MDA integrated with SMC distributions at the study site did not reduce malaria incidence among children relative to placebo MDA, despite evidence that, compared with the control group, mosquito survivorship in the first year was reduced in the intervention group the week following MDA and overall improvements in haemoglobin were greater in children in the intervention group. Confounding factors, including unexpectedly low malaria incidence over the trial period, possibly due to government distribution of dual-chemistry ITNs to all trial clusters in the middle of the intervention period, overdispersion of the primary incidence outcome between clusters, and high parasite and mosquito species diversity, might have influenced the primary outcome.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
非洲关键病媒控制措施(如长效驱虫蚊帐[ITNs]和室内滞留喷洒)的成效受到广泛的杀虫剂抗性以及对室外蚊虫叮咬效果不足的威胁。研究表明,用于治疗寄生虫病的伊维菌素可杀死吸食接受治疗者血液的疟疾病媒,因此,如果在疟疾流行地区的社区广泛施用,可能是一种有效的补充病媒控制工具。我们旨在测试重复高剂量伊维菌素群体药物给药(MDA)的安全性及其与季节性疟疾化学预防(SMC)联合使用时对降低儿童疟疾发病率的效果。
我们在布基纳法索西南部连续两个雨季(2019 - 20年)开展了一项3期、双盲、安慰剂对照、整群随机、平行组试验。通过随机抽签将14个村庄或村庄区域(整群)随机分配(1:1)接受伊维菌素或安慰剂MDA,2019年7月和2020年7月纳入所有符合研究条件的参与者(即那些常住该整群并提供书面知情同意书的人)。参与者身高达到90厘米或更高且无其他安全原因(如怀孕或正在服用SMC药物)被排除在外者,即符合MDA条件。参与者无年龄限制。每个雨季(7月至10月),干预组整群的符合条件参与者每月接受高剂量口服伊维菌素MDA(每日三次剂量,根据身高分组约为300μg/kg),对照组参与者每月接受口服安慰剂MDA,最多进行8轮治疗。MDA由研究人员与社区卫生工作者同时为两组3 - 59个月的儿童进行每月一次的SMC给药。除药剂师外,所有参与者和研究人员均对分组情况不知情。主要结局是10岁及以下儿童的每周疟疾发病率,通过主动病例检测直至第2年第16周,按意向性分析。通过主动和被动监测对所有MDA参与者的不良事件进行监测。采集血液用于次要寄生虫学结局分析,包括疟疾病例中寄生虫种类分布的分析。从每组预先选定的3个整群中的家庭采集蚊子用于次要昆虫学结局分析,包括吸食血液的蚊子存活率、蚊虫叮咬率和昆虫接种率的分析。评估了2020年10岁及以下儿童干预前后血红蛋白的变化。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03967054)和泛非临床试验注册中心(PACT201907479787308)注册并已完成。
该研究于2019年7月13日至2020年11月8日进行,7个村庄被分配到对照组,7个村庄被分配到干预组。2019年7月和2020年7月从两组家庭中纳入参与者。干预组中,2019年有1928名参与者、2020年有2163名参与者接受随访,2019年有703名儿童、2020年有686名儿童进行分析。对照组中,2019年有1604名参与者、2020年有1921名参与者接受随访,2019年有605名儿童、2020年有641名儿童进行分析。在纳入人群(包括不符合条件者)中,MDA覆盖率(接受≥1剂)在干预期内有所变化(68 - 74%),在研究期间86 - 95%符合条件的参与者接受了伊维菌素或安慰剂。对照组610名儿童中的288名(47.2%)和伊维菌素组706名儿童中的312名(44.2%)接受了SMC,所有整群在2019年10月由政府当局提供了含有氯虫苯甲酰胺和α - 氯氰菊酯的新型双化学Interceptor G2 ITNs。干预组儿童每100人周的平均估计每周疟疾发病率为1.78(95%CI 1.24 - 2.53),对照组为1.84(1.29 - 2.64),发病率比为0.96(95%CI 0.58 - 1.59;p = 0.8723)。干预组符合条件参与者的不良事件风险低于对照组(风险比0.63,95%CI 0.46 - 0.87;p = 0.0049)。在临床疟疾儿童中检测到的疟原虫种类分布出人意料地多样,在505名有症状儿童中有56名(11%)检测到非恶性疟原虫种类;然而,两组间种类分布无差异(p = 0.15)。2019年MDA后一周在干预组整群中捕获的吸食血液的冈比亚按蚊复合体蚊子相对于对照组整群捕获的蚊子存活率降低(p < 0.0001),但在MDA后3周捕获的蚊子中未观察到这种效果。总体昆虫接种率(EIRs;每人每晚感染性叮咬数)在两组间无差异(干预组EIR 0.010;对照组EIR 0.011;组间比0.91,95%CI 0.56 - 1.30;p = 0.45)。2020年,干预组10岁及以下儿童干预前至干预后的血红蛋白增加显著高于对照组(p = 0.007)。
在研究地点,与安慰剂MDA相比,重复高剂量伊维菌素MDA与SMC联合使用并未降低儿童疟疾发病率,尽管有证据表明,与对照组相比,干预组在MDA后第一周蚊子存活率降低,且干预组儿童血红蛋白总体改善更大。混杂因素,包括试验期间疟疾发病率意外较低(可能是由于在干预期中期政府向所有试验整群分发了双化学ITNs)、整群间主要发病率结局的过度离散以及寄生虫和蚊虫种类多样性高,可能影响了主要结局。
美国国立过敏与传染病研究所。