Schott Jonathan M, Marshall Charles R
University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Preventive Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2025 May;83(5):1-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1807718. Epub 2025 May 9.
The licensing of lecanemab and donanemab, disease-modifying immunotherapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) targeting β-amyloid pathology, has been met with difference in opinion about efficacy, adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness. Here we summarize the current situation and make the case for cautious adoption of these treatments into clinical practice. This opinion is predicated on four main observations: 1) these treatments impact the core pathologies of AD and result in meaningful benefits; 2) while adverse effects can be serious, these are proving manageable in clinical practice; 3) upscaling services to deliver these agents is likely to provide wider benefits for diagnosing and treating dementia and facilitating the adoption of future treatments from the dementia drug pipeline; and 4) factoring in both the wider societal cost of care and potential for continued accrual of long term benefits will be likely to bring these treatments within acceptable cost-effectiveness thresholds.
针对β-淀粉样蛋白病理的阿尔茨海默病(AD)疾病修饰免疫疗法lecanemab和donanemab的获批,引发了人们在疗效、不良反应和成本效益方面的不同意见。在此,我们总结当前情况,并论证谨慎将这些治疗方法应用于临床实践的理由。这一观点基于四个主要观察结果:1)这些治疗方法影响AD的核心病理,并带来显著益处;2)虽然不良反应可能很严重,但在临床实践中已证明是可控的;3)扩大服务规模以提供这些药物可能会为痴呆症的诊断和治疗带来更广泛的益处,并促进采用痴呆症药物研发管道中的未来治疗方法;4)将更广泛的社会护理成本和持续积累长期益处的可能性考虑在内,可能会使这些治疗方法处于可接受的成本效益阈值范围内。