Martin Jewell D, Frear Darcy, Roberts Samantha A, Dohnal Victoria A, Kieffer Cameron, Morin Steve L, Lock Ian, Balogun Aliyah, Chhina Nimi
BioMarin (United States), San Rafael, CA, USA.
BridgeBio (United States), Palo Alto, USA.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jul;59(4):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00788-w. Epub 2025 May 9.
Since 2012, the United States Congress enacted several laws requiring the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to consider the voice and perspective of patients in the regulatory review process. The goal of the paper is to evaluate the implementation and impact of this provision by assessing the inclusion of Patient Experience Data (PED) (i.e., in PED Tables and benefit-risk frameworks) in approval documents for FDA approved drugs from 2019 through 2023. It builds on previous analyses by providing a comprehensive assessment of the use of PED by sponsors and FDA.
Authors assessed whether PED was submitted and reported in approval documents of 277 drugs or biologics approved by FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research (CBER). PED reported in drug approval documents and in product labels were analyzed for each indication.
Of the 277 approval documents analyzed, 252 included the PED Table in some form, where 179 tables were considered complete with PED. PED was included in the benefit risk framework for 85 (30%) applications and included in the label in 75 (27%) applications.
Efforts to standardize and improve the systematic approach to collecting and utilizing PED has been ongoing for over 10 years. Our analysis has shown that both FDA and sponsors are increasingly considering patient voice to inform drug development and decision-making; however, more transparency is needed to ensure external stakeholders understand how FDA is reviewing and considering PED to inform regulatory decision-making.
自2012年以来,美国国会颁布了多项法律,要求美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)在监管审查过程中考虑患者的意见和观点。本文的目的是通过评估2019年至2023年FDA批准药物的批准文件中患者体验数据(PED)(即PED表格和获益-风险框架)的纳入情况,来评估这一规定的实施情况和影响。它在先前分析的基础上,对申办方和FDA使用PED的情况进行了全面评估。
作者评估了FDA药物评价和研究中心(CDER)以及生物制品评价和研究中心(CBER)批准的277种药物或生物制品的批准文件中是否提交并报告了PED。对每种适应症的药物批准文件和产品标签中报告的PED进行了分析。
在分析的277份批准文件中,252份以某种形式包含了PED表格,其中179份表格被认为完整包含了PED。85份(30%)申请的获益-风险框架中包含了PED,75份(27%)申请的标签中包含了PED。
标准化并改进收集和利用PED的系统方法的工作已经进行了十多年。我们的分析表明,FDA和申办方都越来越多地考虑患者的意见以指导药物研发和决策;然而,需要更高的透明度,以确保外部利益相关者了解FDA如何审查和考虑PED以指导监管决策。