• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与内镜辅助腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性比较研究

Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted versus endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in node-positive breast cancer: a retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Wu Zhijie, Liu Qiwen, Li Zongyan, Chen Zuxiao, Wu Yongxin, Luo Yunxiang, Wei Lina, Hu Qiongyu, Li Haiyan

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.

Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2025 May 9;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03794-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-025-03794-2
PMID:40346527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12065252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgery is increasingly being adopted for breast cancer treatment. However, robust clinical evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety remains limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the surgical quality and short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (R-ALND) and endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (E-ALND) in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Here, we report the short-term outcomes of this trial.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study compared the short-term efficacy and safety of R-ALND and E-ALND in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients who underwent surgery at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2022 and October 2024 were included. Clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were included, with 29 undergoing E-ALND and 27 undergoing R-ALND. The R-ALND group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (43.37 ± 12.40 min vs. 60.10 ± 19.37 min, p < 0.001) and lower mean intraoperative blood loss (3.26 ± 2.40 ml vs. 9.24 ± 4.29 ml, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, the R-ALND group exhibited better upper limb function and sensation, as evidenced by significantly lower DASH scores at 1-month (10.87 ± 1.35 vs. 14.64 ± 3.49, p < 0.001) and 3-month (6.68 ± 1.86 vs. 9.24 ± 2.74, p < 0.001) follow-ups. Additionally, the R-ALND group had fewer postoperative complications, including a reduced incidence of sensory disturbances, burning sensations, and numbness in the upper limb.

CONCLUSION

Compared with E-ALND, R-ALND significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications, with less impact on upper limb function and sensory outcomes. These findings indicate that R-ALND may provide better clinical benefits for patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection in the management of breast cancer.

摘要

背景

机器人手术在乳腺癌治疗中的应用越来越广泛。然而,关于其有效性和安全性的有力临床证据仍然有限。这项回顾性队列研究旨在比较机器人辅助腋窝淋巴结清扫术(R-ALND)和内镜辅助腋窝淋巴结清扫术(E-ALND)在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中的手术质量和短期结局。在此,我们报告该试验的短期结局。

方法

这项单中心回顾性研究比较了R-ALND和E-ALND在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中的短期疗效和安全性。纳入了2022年1月至2024年10月在中山大学附属第六医院接受手术的患者。分析了临床和病理特征、手术结局及术后并发症。

结果

共纳入56例患者,其中29例行E-ALND,27例行R-ALND。R-ALND组的手术时间显著更短(43.37±12.40分钟 vs. 60.10±19.37分钟,p<0.001),术中平均失血量更低(3.26±2.40毫升 vs. 9.24±4.29毫升,p<0.001)。术后,R-ALND组的上肢功能和感觉更好,在1个月(10.87±1.35 vs. 14.64±3.49,p<0.001)和3个月(6.68±1.86 vs. 9.24±2.74,p<0.001)随访时的DASH评分显著更低证明了这一点。此外,R-ALND组的术后并发症更少,包括上肢感觉障碍、烧灼感和麻木的发生率降低。

结论

与E-ALND相比,R-ALND显著减少术中失血量和术后并发症,对上肢功能和感觉结局的影响更小。这些发现表明,R-ALND可能为乳腺癌治疗中需要腋窝淋巴结清扫的患者提供更好的临床益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bad8/12065252/49af67de99b2/12957_2025_3794_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bad8/12065252/31c118b86ff7/12957_2025_3794_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bad8/12065252/49af67de99b2/12957_2025_3794_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bad8/12065252/31c118b86ff7/12957_2025_3794_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bad8/12065252/49af67de99b2/12957_2025_3794_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted versus endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in node-positive breast cancer: a retrospective comparative study.机器人辅助与内镜辅助腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性比较研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 May 9;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03794-2.
2
Single-Port Three-Dimensional Endoscopic-Assisted Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (S-P 3D E-ALND): Surgical Technique and Preliminary Results.单孔三维内镜辅助腋窝淋巴结清扫术(S-P 3D E-ALND):手术技术及初步结果
Breast J. 2024 Dec 4;2024:6319218. doi: 10.1155/tbj/6319218. eCollection 2024.
3
Arm morbidity of axillary dissection with sentinel node biopsy versus delayed axillary dissection.前哨淋巴结活检与延迟腋窝清扫术相比,腋窝清扫术的上肢并发症
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Sep;88(9):917-921. doi: 10.1111/ans.14382. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
4
The clinical relevance of axillary reverse mapping (ARM): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.腋窝反向绘图(ARM)的临床相关性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Apr 25;14:111. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-111.
5
The evolution of the sentinel node procedure in the treatment of breast cancer.前哨淋巴结活检术在乳腺癌治疗中的发展历程。
Dan Med J. 2017 Oct;64(10).
6
Upper outer boundaries of the axillary dissection. Result of the SENTIBRAS protocol: Multicentric protocol using axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer patients requiring axillary dissection.腋窝清扫的上外侧边界。SENTIBRAS方案的结果:在需要腋窝清扫的乳腺癌患者中使用腋窝反向映射的多中心方案。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.138. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
7
Evaluating Operative Times for Intraoperative Conversion of Axillary Node Biopsy to Axillary Lymph Node Dissection with Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction.评估腋窝淋巴结活检术中转为腋窝淋巴结清扫并立即进行淋巴管重建的手术时间。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2025 Feb;41(2):144-148. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787727. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Efficacy and safety comparison between axillary lymph node dissection with no axillary surgery in patients with sentinel node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腋窝淋巴结清扫术与前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌无腋窝手术的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 26;23(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02101-8.
9
Comparison of survival outcomes between axillary conservation and axillary lymph node dissections in N1 early breast cancer: a propensity-matched SEER analysis.N1 早期乳腺癌腋窝保留与腋窝淋巴结清扫的生存结局比较:倾向评分匹配 SEER 分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2023 Apr;25(4):1091-1101. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-03017-0. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
10
Development of a predictive score of axillary lymph node dissection based on targeted axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosis, affected lymph nodes, and neoadjuvant treatment.基于乳腺癌诊断、受累淋巴结和新辅助治疗的靶向腋窝清扫术,建立腋窝淋巴结清扫术预测评分的研究。
Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;38:101629. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101629. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes.机器人辅助经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜辅助经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的标本质量、并发症发生率及长期肿瘤学结果相似。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1637-1644. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01558-2. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Early experience of robotic axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer.
早期机器人腋窝淋巴结清扫术在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中的应用经验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Apr;198(3):405-412. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06760-8. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Association of Long-term Oncologic Prognosis With Minimal Access Breast Surgery vs Conventional Breast Surgery.微创乳房手术与传统乳房手术对长期肿瘤预后的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Dec 1;157(12):e224711. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4711. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌(REAL):一项多中心随机对照试验的短期结果
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):991-1004. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
6
Efficacy of da Vinci robot-assisted lymph node surgery than conventional axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer - A comparative study.达芬奇机器人辅助淋巴结手术在乳腺癌中的疗效优于传统腋窝淋巴结清扫术——一项比较研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Dec;17(6):e2307. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2307. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Contrast of Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection of Patients With Breast Cancer: Meta-Analysis.乳腺癌患者乳腔镜与传统腋窝淋巴结清扫术的对比:Meta 分析。
Cancer Control. 2020 Apr-Jun;27(2):1073274820932987. doi: 10.1177/1073274820932987.
8
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术与开放性根治性子宫切除术的生存比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1019-1027. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1694.
9
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.