Suppr超能文献

乳牙前牙的修复策略:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Restorative strategies for deciduous anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Oliveira Rodolfo de Carvalho, Garbim Jonathan Rafael, Passaro Ana Laura, Tedesco Tamara Kerber, Raggio Daniela Prócida

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Universitary Center FACENS, Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Evid Based Dent. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01144-5.

Abstract

AIM

Common causes of destruction in primary anterior teeth include dental caries and trauma. This systematic review evaluated the success rate of restorative techniques for these cases.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and ProQuest until February 2024. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies of interventions with ≥12 months of follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were: studies with >30% loss to follow-up, unclear evaluation criteria, management under general anesthesia, unhealthy patients, or lacking individual success data. A meta-analysis assessed success rates, with subgroup analyses. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE system.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 852 teeth from 271 children aged 2-9 years, with follow-ups of 3-36 months, were included. The meta-analysis revealed a 71% success rate at 12 months for all techniques. Strip crowns (79%) and zirconia crowns (70%) had the highest success rates for teeth without endodontic treatment. Intracanal posts (resin or glass fiber) achieved an 83% success rate for teeth requiring endodontic treatment. Evidence certainty was low.

DISCUSSION

Strip crowns and zirconia crowns performed well for teeth without endodontic treatment, with strip crowns offering a simpler and less technique-sensitive option. Biological restorations had poorer outcomes due to their complexity, sensitivity, and the need for a tooth biobank, raising legal and logistical challenges. Although zirconia crowns require extensive subgingival preparation, they align less with minimally invasive principles compared to strip crowns. Intracanal posts showed high success rates for teeth needing endodontic treatment, regardless of the material used.

CONCLUSIONS

Strip crowns appear to be a suitable option for restoring primary anterior teeth that do not require endodontic treatment. For teeth requiring endodontic treatment, the use of intracanal posts combined with strip crowns seems to yield satisfactory results.

摘要

目的

乳前牙损坏的常见原因包括龋齿和外伤。本系统评价评估了这些病例修复技术的成功率。

方法

截至2024年2月,在Medline(PubMed)、Scopus、科学网、Cochrane、Embase和ProQuest中进行了系统检索。纳入随访时间≥12个月的随机对照试验和非随机干预研究。排除标准为:随访失访率>30%的研究、评价标准不明确的研究、全身麻醉下的治疗、患者健康状况不佳的研究或缺乏个体成功数据的研究。进行荟萃分析评估成功率,并进行亚组分析。使用RoB 2和ROBINS - I评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE系统评估证据确定性。

结果

纳入8项研究,涉及271名2 - 9岁儿童的852颗牙齿,随访时间为3 - 36个月。荟萃分析显示,所有技术在12个月时的成功率为71%。对于未进行根管治疗的牙齿,条带冠(79%)和氧化锆冠(70%)的成功率最高。对于需要根管治疗的牙齿,根管内桩(树脂或玻璃纤维)的成功率达到83%。证据确定性较低。

讨论

对于未进行根管治疗的牙齿,条带冠和氧化锆冠表现良好,条带冠提供了一种更简单且技术敏感性较低的选择。生物修复由于其复杂性、敏感性以及对牙齿生物库的需求,结果较差,带来了法律和后勤方面的挑战。尽管氧化锆冠需要广泛的龈下预备,但与条带冠相比,它们在微创原则方面的契合度较低。无论使用何种材料,根管内桩对于需要根管治疗的牙齿都显示出较高的成功率。

结论

条带冠似乎是修复不需要根管治疗的乳前牙的合适选择。对于需要根管治疗的牙齿,使用根管内桩联合条带冠似乎能产生令人满意的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验