• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病足溃疡基于免疫的诊断生物标志物组合的制定与验证

Elaboration and verification of immune-based diagnostic biomarker panel for diabetic foot ulcer.

作者信息

Gao Hengkun, Chen Sibing, Li Jiannan, Liu Yanxi

机构信息

Department of Wound Repair, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No.126 Xiantai Street, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2025 Aug;39(8):108957. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2025.108957. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2025.108957
PMID:40349610
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) constitutes a major complication in diabetes management. This study aimed to develop and validate an immune-related diagnostic model for DFU by identifying key genes and analyzing their functional enrichment.

METHODS

We utilized the datasets GSE199939, GSE134431, and GSE80178 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was employed to identify gene modules associated with DFU. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were pinpointed using the "limma" package, and functional enrichment was executed using "clusterProfiler". A risk score for diagnosing DFU was developed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) model. The CIBERSORT algorithm was utilized to assess immune cell infiltration. The diagnostic effectiveness of the risk score was gauged through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and drug target prediction was performed using the DGIdb database.

RESULTS

WGCNA identified a DFU-related gene module containing 2184 genes. Functional enrichment analysis revealed important pathways, including proteasome and cell cycle. Nine DEGs were recognized as immune-related candidates for DFU, predominantly involved in signaling cascades like cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. The LASSO model selected four key genes (APOD, ULBP2, TGFBR3, TNFRSF12A) to construct a risk score, which showed high diagnostic accuracy in datasets GSE134431, GSE199939 and GSE80178 (AUC = 0.990, 1.000, and 0.926, respectively). Pronounced disparities in infiltrating immune cells were observed among DFU patient groups with disparate risk factors. Drug prediction analyses identified potential therapeutic targets for the key genes.

CONCLUSION

This study developed a powerful immune-related diagnostic model for DFU, highlighting the key genes and pathways involved in its pathogenesis. The risk score provides a valuable tool for DFU diagnosis, while the identified drug targets provide avenues for potential therapeutic intervention.

摘要

背景

糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是糖尿病管理中的主要并发症。本研究旨在通过识别关键基因并分析其功能富集情况,开发并验证一种用于DFU的免疫相关诊断模型。

方法

我们使用了来自基因表达综合数据库(GEO)的数据集GSE199939、GSE134431和GSE80178。采用加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)来识别与DFU相关的基因模块。使用“limma”软件包确定差异表达基因(DEG),并使用“clusterProfiler”进行功能富集分析。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)模型建立DFU诊断风险评分。利用CIBERSORT算法评估免疫细胞浸润情况。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估风险评分的诊断效能,并使用DGIdb数据库进行药物靶点预测。

结果

WGCNA识别出一个包含2184个基因的DFU相关基因模块。功能富集分析揭示了包括蛋白酶体和细胞周期等重要通路。九个DEG被确定为DFU的免疫相关候选基因,主要参与细胞因子-细胞因子受体相互作用等信号级联反应。LASSO模型选择了四个关键基因(载脂蛋白D(APOD)、UL16结合蛋白2(ULBP2)、转化生长因子β受体3(TGFBR3)、肿瘤坏死因子受体超家族成员12A(TNFRSF12A))构建风险评分,该评分在数据集GSE134431、GSE199939和GSE80178中显示出较高的诊断准确性(AUC分别为0.990、1.000和0.926)。在具有不同风险因素的DFU患者组中观察到免疫细胞浸润存在明显差异。药物预测分析确定了关键基因的潜在治疗靶点。

结论

本研究开发了一种强大的DFU免疫相关诊断模型,突出了其发病机制中涉及的关键基因和通路。风险评分为DFU诊断提供了有价值的工具,而确定的药物靶点为潜在的治疗干预提供了途径。

相似文献

1
Elaboration and verification of immune-based diagnostic biomarker panel for diabetic foot ulcer.糖尿病足溃疡基于免疫的诊断生物标志物组合的制定与验证
J Diabetes Complications. 2025 Aug;39(8):108957. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2025.108957. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
A novel diabetic foot ulcer diagnostic model: identification and analysis of genes related to glutamine metabolism and immune infiltration.一种新型糖尿病足溃疡诊断模型:鉴定和分析与谷氨酰胺代谢和免疫浸润相关的基因。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10038-2.
3
Analysis of ferroptosis-related key genes and regulatory networks in diabetic foot ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡中与铁死亡相关的关键基因及调控网络分析
Gene. 2025 May 20;950:149375. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2025.149375. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
Identification of angiogenesis-related genes in diabetic foot ulcer using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法鉴定糖尿病足溃疡中与血管生成相关的基因
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 29;9(12):e23003. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23003. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Identifying and Validating Extracellular Matrix-Related Gene CTSH in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Using Bioinformatics and Machine Learning.利用生物信息学和机器学习鉴定及验证糖尿病足溃疡中细胞外基质相关基因CTSH
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Aug 30;17:5871-5887. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S467507. eCollection 2024.
6
Analysis and Validation of Mitophagy-Related Genes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡中自噬相关基因的分析与验证
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Mar 25;18:4367-4379. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S504001. eCollection 2025.
7
Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of immune-related genes in diabetic foot ulcers: New insights into mechanisms and therapeutic targets.糖尿病足溃疡免疫相关基因的综合转录组学分析:对发病机制和治疗靶点的新认识。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Sep 30;139:112638. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112638. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
8
Utilizing bioinformatics and machine learning to identify CXCR4 gene-related therapeutic targets in diabetic foot ulcers.利用生物信息学和机器学习识别糖尿病足溃疡中CXCR4基因相关的治疗靶点。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 7;16:1520845. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1520845. eCollection 2025.
9
[Bioinformatics Analysis of Hub Genes of Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Their Biofunctions].糖尿病足溃疡关键基因的生物信息学分析及其生物学功能
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Nov;53(6):961-968. doi: 10.12182/20220860106.
10
[Exploration of key ferroptosis-related genes as therapeutic targets for sepsis based on bioinformatics and the depiction of their immune profiles characterization].基于生物信息学探索关键铁死亡相关基因作为脓毒症的治疗靶点及其免疫图谱特征描述
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Oct;36(10):1025-1032. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240524-00457.