Fonge Yaneve N, Slagle Helen B Gomez, Caplan Richard J, Myers Ellen L, Portillo Roxana, Sciscione Anthony C
Minnesota Perinatal Physicians, Allina Health System, Minneapolis, MN (Fonge).
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Maternal Fetal Medicine (Slagle), New York, New York.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025 Jul;7(7):101698. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101698. Epub 2025 May 9.
Propranolol use has been proposed to shorten the length of labor following prolonged induction.
We sought to determine if administration of propranolol reduces the duration of labor among nulliparous individuals with prolonged latent labor following induction (IOL) at term.
An open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2019 through June 2022 comparing 2mg of intravenous propranolol administration to usual care for prolonged latent labor. Nulliparous individuals undergoing IOL at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and cervical dilation ≤2cm were included. Prolonged latent labor was defined as no cervical change ≥8 hours with ruptured membranes and receiving oxytocin. Labor management was standardized among participants. Our primary outcome was time to delivery.
80 nulliparous participants (40 propranolol, 40 usual care) were randomized. Propranolol administration did not achieve a significantly faster median time to delivery compared to usual care, (propranolol: 27.7 hrs vs. usual care: 30.4 hrs, P<.52). Equal proportions of individuals delivered vaginally within 24hrs of randomization (propranolol: 27.5% vs. usual care: 27.5%, P<1.0). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the 2 groups (57.5% versus 55.0%, P=1.0) and no difference in time to active labor (propranolol: 19.5 hrs vs. usual care: 26.0 hrs, P<.22). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Propranolol administration did not shorten the time to delivery or increase vaginal delivery in nulliparous individuals with a prolonged latent labor course. Our findings do not support the use of propranolol for prolonged latent labor in nulliparous patients undergoing IOL at term.
有人提出使用普萘洛尔可缩短引产时间延长后的产程。
我们试图确定在足月引产(IOL)后潜伏期延长的初产妇中,使用普萘洛尔是否能缩短产程。
2019年7月至2022年6月进行了一项开放标签随机临床试验,比较静脉注射2mg普萘洛尔与对潜伏期延长的常规护理。纳入妊娠≥37周、单胎妊娠且宫颈扩张≤2cm并接受IOL的初产妇。潜伏期延长定义为胎膜破裂且使用缩宫素后宫颈无变化≥8小时。参与者的分娩管理标准化。我们的主要结局是分娩时间。
80名初产妇(40名使用普萘洛尔,40名接受常规护理)被随机分组。与常规护理相比,使用普萘洛尔并未显著加快中位分娩时间(普萘洛尔组:27.7小时 vs. 常规护理组:30.4小时,P<0.52)。随机分组后24小时内阴道分娩的比例相同(普萘洛尔组:27.5% vs. 常规护理组:27.5%,P<1.0)。两组间剖宫产率无差异(57.5%对55.0%,P=1.0),活跃期分娩时间也无差异(普萘洛尔组:19.5小时 vs. 常规护理组:26.0小时,P<0.22)。母婴结局无显著差异。
对于潜伏期延长的初产妇,使用普萘洛尔并未缩短分娩时间或增加阴道分娩率。我们的研究结果不支持在足月接受IOL的初产妇中使用普萘洛尔治疗潜伏期延长。