Suppr超能文献

用于从牧场中回收线虫感染性幼虫的两种技术的比较。

Comparison of two techniques used for the recovery of nematode infective larvae from pasture.

作者信息

Gettinby G, McKellar Q A, Bairden K, Theodoridis Y, Whitelaw A

出版信息

Res Vet Sci. 1985 Jul;39(1):99-102.

PMID:4035098
Abstract

The recovery of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from herbage collected manually was compared with the recovery from herbage ingested by sheep with oesophageal fistulae, on five occasions during the grazing season. At least three times more larvae were recovered from the oesophageal fistulates than by manual collection. There was no significant variation between the numbers of larvae collected at 09.00, 12.00 and 15.00, nor was there any difference in the distribution of genera recovered by the two methods. The worm burdens of tracer lambs and the larval counts from the fistulated sheep were used to estimate the rate of larval establishment.

摘要

在放牧季节的五个不同时间点,对通过人工采集的牧草中胃肠道线虫感染性幼虫的回收率,与通过食管瘘管羊摄入的牧草中幼虫的回收率进行了比较。从食管瘘管羊体内回收的幼虫数量至少是人工采集数量的三倍以上。在上午9点、12点和下午3点采集的幼虫数量之间没有显著差异,两种方法回收的线虫属分布也没有差异。利用示踪羔羊的蠕虫负荷和瘘管羊的幼虫计数来估计幼虫定殖率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验