Suppr超能文献

一级创伤中心创伤死亡率的时间模式及死亡原因:对改善创伤护理的启示

Temporal Patterns of Trauma Mortality and Causes of Death in a Level 1 Trauma Center: Implications for Improved Trauma Care.

作者信息

Thokaloath Rahul Sreenivasan, Samuel Shajimon, Kumar B P Vinod

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 May;15(5):240-247. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Trauma mortality patterns have evolved over time, with distinct phases of immediate, early, and late deaths. Advances in trauma care and changing injury dynamics have contributed to shifts in this pattern. Understanding the causes and timing of trauma deaths is pivotal for enhancing trauma care systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of trauma deaths in 2020-2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Trauma death data were collected from case records, wound certificates, and death certificates. The time of death from trauma was calculated and deaths were categorized into immediate, early (within 24 h), and late (after 24 h) groups. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, were performed to assess associations.

RESULTS

Of the 186 trauma deaths studied, 86.6% were males, and the mean age was 40 ± 16.91 years. Immediate deaths were predominantly due to brain injury (BI) (54.8%), thoracic injury (17.9%), and spinal cord injury (16.7%). Early deaths were mainly attributed to BI (35.1%) and poly-trauma (35.1%). Late deaths (after 24 h) were primarily a result of multiple organ failure (44.4%) and sepsis (24.4%). The analysis showed a significant association between the cause of death and time from trauma to death (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BI emerged as the leading cause of trauma-related deaths, with a progressive decline pattern observed in a well-established trauma care center. Immediate deaths can potentially be reduced through trauma prevention strategies, particularly in the context of high-speed vehicles and machinery. These findings underscore the importance of timely interventions, effective critical care, and continuous improvements in trauma care systems.

摘要

引言

创伤死亡率模式随时间演变,有即时、早期和晚期死亡的不同阶段。创伤护理的进展和不断变化的损伤动态导致了这种模式的转变。了解创伤死亡的原因和时间对于加强创伤护理系统至关重要。

材料与方法

我们对一家一级创伤中心2020 - 2022年的创伤死亡病例进行了回顾性分析。创伤死亡数据从病例记录、伤口证明和死亡证明中收集。计算创伤死亡时间,并将死亡分为即时、早期(24小时内)和晚期(24小时后)组。进行了包括卡方检验在内的统计分析以评估相关性。

结果

在研究的186例创伤死亡病例中,86.6%为男性,平均年龄为40±16.91岁。即时死亡主要归因于脑损伤(BI)(54.8%)、胸部损伤(17.9%)和脊髓损伤(16.7%)。早期死亡主要归因于BI(35.1%)和多发伤(35.1%)。晚期死亡(24小时后)主要是多器官功能衰竭(44.4%)和脓毒症(24.4%)的结果。分析显示死亡原因与创伤至死亡时间之间存在显著关联(P<0.001)。

结论

在一家成熟的创伤护理中心,BI成为创伤相关死亡的主要原因,且呈现出逐渐下降的模式。通过创伤预防策略,特别是在高速车辆和机械的背景下,即时死亡有可能减少。这些发现强调了及时干预、有效的重症护理以及创伤护理系统持续改进的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验