• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循环端粒重复结合因子2和白细胞端粒长度对乳腺癌死亡率的预后价值。

Prognosis value of circulating telomere repeat binding factor 2 and leukocyte telomere length in breast cancer mortality.

作者信息

Sasmita Dhyas Ma, Anwar Sumadi L, Heriyanto Didik S, Paramita Dewi K, Hendrawan Fandi, Aryandono Teguh

机构信息

Department of Oncological Surgery, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Department of Surgery, Dr. Soeradji Tirtonegoro General Hospital, Klaten, Indonesia.

出版信息

Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e1601. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1601. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

DOI:10.52225/narra.v5i1.1601
PMID:40352198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12059881/
Abstract

Telomere repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) is currently a novel tumor marker, yet its clinical implication has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of circulating TRF2 and leukocyte telomere length in 5-year mortality in breast cancer patients. In this cohort retrospective study, breast cancer patients were included and the length of telomeres and circulating TRF2 were quantified. Receiver operating characteristics and the Youden index were used to determine the optimal cut-off. To analyze the overall survival rate in five years, Kaplan Meier analysis was used, while the prognostic value of both variables was analyzed in Cox proportional hazard regression on both univariate and multivariate models. Our data indicated that the optimal cut-off points for TRF2 and leukocyte telomere length were 598 pg/mL and 0.93 kb, respectively. Based on the optimal cut-off points, the participant's data was grouped, and our data indicated that the high TRF2 group had a poorer overall survival rate in comparison to the low group (91.3% vs 83.87%; log-rank test;  < 0.01). The overall survival between short and long telomeres was comparable (88.24% vs 88.37%; log-rank test;  = 0.64). TRF2 (hazard ratio (HR): 3.66; 95%CI: 1.45-9.29) and molecular subtype ( = 0.04) were identified as independent factors to predict mortality. In conclusion, a high circulating TRF2 in breast cancer participants was associated with lower overall 5-year survival rates in comparison with the low TRF2 group. Moreover, high TRF2 could predict the mortality of the breast cancer population to be 3.66 times higher than the lower group. In contrast, telomere length was not associated with overall survival rate nor predicting mortality in five years.

摘要

端粒重复结合因子2(TRF2)目前是一种新型肿瘤标志物,但其临床意义尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是探讨循环TRF2和白细胞端粒长度对乳腺癌患者5年死亡率的预后价值。在这项队列回顾性研究中,纳入了乳腺癌患者,并对端粒长度和循环TRF2进行了定量分析。采用受试者工作特征曲线和尤登指数确定最佳截断值。为分析5年总生存率,采用Kaplan Meier分析,而在单变量和多变量模型的Cox比例风险回归中分析了这两个变量的预后价值。我们的数据表明,TRF2和白细胞端粒长度的最佳截断点分别为598 pg/mL和0.93 kb。基于最佳截断点,对参与者的数据进行分组,我们的数据表明,与低TRF2组相比,高TRF2组的总生存率较差(91.3%对83.87%;对数秩检验;P<0.01)。短端粒和长端粒之间的总生存率相当(88.24%对88.37%;对数秩检验;P = 0.64)。TRF2(风险比(HR):3.66;95%置信区间:1.45 - 9.29)和分子亚型(P = 0.04)被确定为预测死亡率的独立因素。总之,与低TRF2组相比,乳腺癌患者中循环TRF2水平高与5年总生存率较低相关。此外,高TRF2可预测乳腺癌人群的死亡率比低TRF2组高3.66倍。相比之下,端粒长度与总生存率无关,也不能预测5年死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b3/12059881/b15e3dc146d1/NarraJ-5-e1601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b3/12059881/06b68d21afc8/NarraJ-5-e1601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b3/12059881/b15e3dc146d1/NarraJ-5-e1601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b3/12059881/06b68d21afc8/NarraJ-5-e1601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b3/12059881/b15e3dc146d1/NarraJ-5-e1601-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognosis value of circulating telomere repeat binding factor 2 and leukocyte telomere length in breast cancer mortality.循环端粒重复结合因子2和白细胞端粒长度对乳腺癌死亡率的预后价值。
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e1601. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1601. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
2
Elevated TRF2 in advanced breast cancers with short telomeres.端粒较短的晚期乳腺癌中 TRF2 水平升高。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(3):623-30. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0988-7. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
3
Change in peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length and mortality in breast cancer survivors.外周血白细胞端粒长度变化与乳腺癌幸存者的死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr;106(4):dju035. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju035. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
4
Expression of TRF2 and its prognostic relevance in advanced stage cervical cancer patients.TRF2在晚期宫颈癌患者中的表达及其预后相关性。
Biol Res. 2014 Nov 25;47(1):61. doi: 10.1186/0717-6287-47-61.
5
Expression of telomere-associated genes as prognostic markers for overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.端粒相关基因的表达作为非小细胞肺癌患者总生存的预后标志物
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 1;12(19):5720-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2809.
6
Coordinate regulation between expression levels of telomere-binding proteins and telomere length in breast carcinomas.端粒结合蛋白表达水平与乳腺癌中端粒长度的协调调控。
Cancer Med. 2012 Oct;1(2):165-75. doi: 10.1002/cam4.14. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
7
Association between prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length and breast cancer risk: the Singapore Chinese Health Study.诊断前白细胞端粒长度与乳腺癌风险的关联:新加坡华人健康研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 17;21(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1133-0.
8
Abnormal function of telomere protein TRF2 induces cell mutation and the effects of environmental tumor‑promoting factors (Review).端粒蛋白 TRF2 功能异常可诱导细胞突变,且易受环境肿瘤促进因子的影响(综述)。
Oncol Rep. 2021 Aug;46(2). doi: 10.3892/or.2021.8135. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
9
Control of human telomere length by TRF1 and TRF2.TRF1和TRF2对人类端粒长度的调控。
Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Mar;20(5):1659-68. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.5.1659-1668.2000.
10
Telomere length, TERT and shelterin complex proteins in hepatocellular carcinomas expressing "stemness"-related markers.端粒长度、TERT 和具有“干性”相关标志物表达的肝细胞癌中的庇护素复合物蛋白。
J Hepatol. 2013 Oct;59(4):746-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular interaction analysis of ferulic acid (4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid) as main bioactive compound from palm oil waste against MCF-7 receptors: An in silico study.阿魏酸(4-羟基-3-甲氧基肉桂酸)作为棕榈油废料中的主要生物活性化合物与MCF-7受体的分子相互作用分析:一项计算机模拟研究。
Narra J. 2024 Aug;4(2):e775. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.775. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Association between COVID-19 severity with liver abnormalities: A retrospective study in a referral hospital in Indonesia.2019冠状病毒病严重程度与肝脏异常之间的关联:印度尼西亚一家转诊医院的回顾性研究。
Narra J. 2024 Aug;4(2):e816. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.816. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Determinants of COVID-19 severity and mortality in children: A retrospective and multicenter cohort study in Medan, Indonesia.
儿童新冠病毒病严重程度和死亡率的决定因素:印度尼西亚棉兰的一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Narra J. 2024 Aug;4(2):e865. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.865. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
4
Different Role of TRF1 and TRF2 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers.TRF1和TRF2表达在非小细胞肺癌中的不同作用
Onco Targets Ther. 2024 Jun 4;17:463-469. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S461430. eCollection 2024.
5
Telomere Status of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Offers a Novel Promising Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker.晚期非小细胞肺癌的端粒状态提供了一种新的有前景的预后和预测生物标志物。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;15(1):290. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010290.
6
Relationship between telomere length and the prognosis of breast cancer based on estrogen receptor status: A Mendelian randomization study.基于雌激素受体状态的端粒长度与乳腺癌预后的关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 21;12:1024772. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1024772. eCollection 2022.
7
Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions.癌症的特征:新视角。
Cancer Discov. 2022 Jan;12(1):31-46. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059.
8
Telomeres and Age-Related Diseases.端粒与年龄相关疾病
Biomedicines. 2021 Sep 27;9(10):1335. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9101335.
9
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
TRF2 and VEGF-A: an unknown relationship with prognostic impact on survival of colorectal cancer patients.TRF2 和 VEGF-A:与结直肠癌患者生存预后相关的未知关系。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 15;39(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01612-z.