Gajjar Avi A, Salem Mohamed M, Sioutas Georgios S, Jabarkheel Rashad, Kuybu Okkes, Khalife Jane, Tonetti Daniel A, Cortez Gustavo, Dmytriw Adam A, Ortega Moreno Diego Alejandro, Smith William, Regenhardt Robert W, Carroll Kate T, Abecassis Zachary A, Ruiz Rodriguez Juan Francisco, Shekhtman Oleg, Hoang Alex Nguyen, Khalessi Alexander A, Baker Cordell, Matejka Matthias, Cancelliere Nicole M, Griessenauer Christoph J, Grandhi Ramesh, Kan Peter, Tanweer Omar, Levitt Michael R, Stapleton Christopher J, Pereira Vitor Mendes, Jankowitz Brian, Riina Howard A, Patel Aman B, Hanel Ricardo, Thomas Ajith J, Lang Michael J, Gross Bradley A, Burkhardt Jan-Karl, Srinivasan Visish M
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 May 13:15910199251341650. doi: 10.1177/15910199251341650.
BackgroundMiddle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a promising treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Cancer patients are at risk for cSDH due to thrombocytopenia. The efficacy of MMAE in this population has not been studied.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 76 patients who underwent 94 MMAEs for cSDH at 12 tertiary centers across North America and Europe between February 2018 and January 2023. We analyzed patient demographics, clinical profiles, procedural details, and outcomes. The primary outcome was cSDH progression, while secondary outcomes included radiographic resolution, mortality, 90-day functional outcomes, functional improvement, and procedural complications.ResultsRadiographic improvement occurred in 88.5% of patients, and technical success was achieved in 96.8%, with comparable rates between the MMAE-only and MMAE + surgery groups. Complications occurred in five patients (5.3%), with no significant difference between groups (6.0% in MMAE vs. 3.7% in MMAE + surgery, = 0.658). Hemorrhage was reported in four patients (4.3%), and no cases of stroke were recorded. Mortality was 24.5% overall, with a slightly higher rate in the MMAE + surgery group (29.6%) compared to the MMAE-only group (22.4%, = 0.460). Functional improvement in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was seen in 15 patients (24.2%), with a significantly greater improvement in the combined group (Δ mRS = 2.625) versus the MMAE-only group (Δ mRS = 0.348, < 0.001).ConclusionsMMAE is a safe and effective treatment option for managing cSDH in cancer patients. Higher mortality in this population is likely reflective of underlying cancer and comorbidities.
背景
脑膜中动脉栓塞术(MMAE)是治疗慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)的一种有前景的方法。癌症患者因血小板减少有发生cSDH的风险。MMAE在该人群中的疗效尚未得到研究。
方法
我们对2018年2月至2023年1月期间在北美和欧洲的12个三级中心接受94次MMAE治疗cSDH的76例患者进行了回顾性分析。我们分析了患者的人口统计学、临床特征、手术细节和结局。主要结局是cSDH进展,次要结局包括影像学消退、死亡率、90天功能结局、功能改善和手术并发症。
结果
88.5%的患者影像学改善,技术成功率为96.8%,单纯MMAE组和MMAE联合手术组的发生率相当。5例患者(5.3%)发生并发症,两组之间无显著差异(MMAE组为6.0%,MMAE联合手术组为3.7%,P = 0.658)。4例患者(4.3%)报告有出血,未记录到中风病例。总体死亡率为24.5%,MMAE联合手术组(29.6%)略高于单纯MMAE组(22.4%,P = 0.460)。15例患者(24.2%)改良Rankin量表(mRS)功能改善,联合组(mRS变化 = 2.625)较单纯MMAE组(mRS变化 = 0.348,P < 0.001)改善更显著。
结论
MMAE是治疗癌症患者cSDH的一种安全有效的选择。该人群较高的死亡率可能反映了潜在的癌症和合并症。