• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效方案中不同促性腺激素释放激素激动剂对体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植结局的影响:一项回顾性研究

Effects of Different Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists on IVF/ICSI-ET Outcomes in Long Protocol: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Xu Min, Li Honglin, Zhao Yiyan, Li Huimei, Zhao Chao, Zhang Xi, Ni Rong, Liang Jian, Xu Jinhuan

机构信息

Reproductive Center, Huai'an First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2025 May 8;17:1313-1320. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S517738. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S517738
PMID:40357020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12068405/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Triptorelin acetate, leuprorelin and goserelin acetate were three commonly used gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) formulations in IVF/ICSI-ET. However, current knowledge about the real-world effects on clinical outcomes of different GnRH-a formulations is limited. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI-ET using different GnRH-a formulations in long protocol during follicle phase.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. A total of 154 infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET in long protocol during follicle phase from September 2019 to December 2023 were assigned to three groups according to different GnRH-a formulations (A: triptorelin acetate; B: leuprorelin; C: goserelin acetate). The baseline information, ovulation induction outcomes and pregnancy outcomes were compared among three groups. Student's -test, Pearson Chi-Square test or Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis appropriately.

RESULTS

Groups A, B and C included 94, 36 and 24 patients, respectively. Compared with groups A and B, group C had significantly smaller total amount of gonadotropin (A vs B vs C: 2224.20±700.02 U vs 2266.67±884.01 U vs 1685.94±360.24 U) and shouter days of using gonadotropin (A vs B vs C: 11.61±1.91 days vs 11.83±2.48 days vs 9.50±0.98 days) (<0.05). Among the three groups, group C had the best pregnancy outcomes with the highest implantation rate (A vs B vs C: 40.4% vs 32.7% vs 41.9%), clinical pregnancy rate (A vs B vs C: 41.7% vs 39.4% vs 57.9%), live birth rate (A vs B vs C: 32.5% vs 33.3% vs 52.6%) and the lowest miscarriage rate (A vs B vs C: 22.9% vs 15.4% vs 9.1%).

CONCLUSION

Goserelin acetate was found to have good pregnancy outcomes in IVF/ICSI-ET with small amount and shout using days of gonadotropin, but there is a lack of statistical significance when compared to the pregnancy outcomes of triptorelin acetate and leuprorelin. The findings need future confirmation in larger trials or meta-analyses.

摘要

背景

醋酸曲普瑞林、亮丙瑞林和醋酸戈舍瑞林是体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)中常用的三种促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)制剂。然而,目前关于不同GnRH-a制剂对临床结局的实际影响的知识有限。在本研究中,我们旨在比较卵泡期长方案中使用不同GnRH-a制剂的IVF/ICSI-ET的临床结局。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究。2019年9月至2023年12月期间,共有154名在卵泡期接受长方案IVF/ICSI-ET的不孕妇女根据不同的GnRH-a制剂分为三组(A组:醋酸曲普瑞林;B组:亮丙瑞林;C组:醋酸戈舍瑞林)。比较三组的基线信息、促排卵结局和妊娠结局。适当使用学生t检验、Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。

结果

A组、B组和C组分别包括94例、36例和24例患者。与A组和B组相比,C组的促性腺激素总量显著更少(A组vs B组vs C组:2224.20±700.02 U vs 2266.67±884.01 U vs 1685.94±360.24 U),促性腺激素使用天数更短(A组vs B组vs C组:11.61±1.91天vs 11.83±2.48天vs 9.50±0.98天)(P<0.05)。在三组中,C组的妊娠结局最佳,着床率最高(A组vs B组vs C组:40.4% vs 32.7% vs 41.9%),临床妊娠率最高(A组vs B组vs C组:41.7% vs 39.4% vs 57.9%),活产率最高(A组vs B组vs C组:32.5% vs 33.3% vs 52.6%),流产率最低(A组vs B组vs C组:22.9% vs 15.4% vs 9.1%)。

结论

在IVF/ICSI-ET中,发现醋酸戈舍瑞林使用促性腺激素的量少、天数短,妊娠结局良好,但与醋酸曲普瑞林和亮丙瑞林的妊娠结局相比,缺乏统计学意义。这些发现需要在更大规模的试验或荟萃分析中进一步证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/130f/12068405/c080e70bbb70/IJWH-17-1313-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/130f/12068405/c080e70bbb70/IJWH-17-1313-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/130f/12068405/c080e70bbb70/IJWH-17-1313-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Different Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists on IVF/ICSI-ET Outcomes in Long Protocol: A Retrospective Study.长效方案中不同促性腺激素释放激素激动剂对体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植结局的影响:一项回顾性研究
Int J Womens Health. 2025 May 8;17:1313-1320. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S517738. eCollection 2025.
2
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology.在拮抗剂辅助生殖技术中,促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素用于卵母细胞触发的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;2014(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.
3
Ovulation triggering with hCG alone, GnRH agonist alone or in combination? A randomized controlled trial in advanced-age women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles.单用 hCG、单用 GnRH 激动剂还是联合应用?一项在接受 IVF/ICSI 周期治疗的高龄妇女中进行的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1795-1805. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac114.
4
Ultra-Long GnRH Agonist Protocol During IVF/ICSI Improves Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Adenomyosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.超长 GnRH 激动剂方案在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射中改善腺肌病患者的妊娠结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 31;12:609771. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.609771. eCollection 2021.
5
Conventional GnRH antagonist protocols versus long GnRH agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI cycles of polycystic ovary syndrome women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多囊卵巢综合征患者体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中,常规 GnRH 拮抗剂方案与长 GnRH 激动剂方案的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08400-z.
6
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Protocol Improves Pregnancy Outcomes During In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Treatment in Young Infertile Women: A Retrospective Study.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂方案改善年轻不孕女性体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)治疗期间的妊娠结局:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 2;16(6):e61554. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61554. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Live birth rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与黄体期促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射中的活产率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023 Dec 14;26:e2. doi: 10.1017/erm.2023.25.
8
Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案与GnRH激动剂方案中严重卵巢过度刺激综合征的风险:一项纳入1050个首次体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期的随机对照试验
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1253-64. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew051. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
9
[Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].国产高纯度尿促卵泡素对控制性卵巢刺激中体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;48(11):838-42.
10
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a propensity-score matching analysis.腺肌症患者行 IVF/ICSI 中 GnRH 拮抗剂方案冻融与长效 GnRH 激动剂方案比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05276-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A new insight on evaluation of the fertility and pregnancy outcome in patients with primary Sjögren syndrome: a propensity score matched study in multi-IVF centers.原发性干燥综合征患者生育力和妊娠结局评估的新视角:多 IVF 中心的倾向评分匹配研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 May 20;22(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01228-4.
2
Live birth rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与黄体期促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射中的活产率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023 Dec 14;26:e2. doi: 10.1017/erm.2023.25.
3
The effect of Shengmai injection in patients with coronary heart disease in real world and its personalized medicine research using machine learning techniques.
生脉注射液在冠心病患者真实世界中的疗效及其基于机器学习技术的个体化医学研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 14;14:1208621. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1208621. eCollection 2023.
4
Real-World Evidence: A Primer.真实世界证据:基础篇。
Pharmaceut Med. 2023 Jan;37(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00456-6. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study.卵泡期 GnRH 激动剂方案与每日黄体中期 GnRH 激动剂方案相比,可提高活产率,且黄体功能和儿童健康方面无明显差异:一项单中心、回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Sep 19;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-01014-0.
6
GnRH agonist treatment regulates IL-6 and IL-11 expression in endometrial stromal cells for patients with HRT regiment in frozen embryo transfer cycles.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗调节激素替代治疗冷冻胚胎移植周期中子宫内膜基质细胞的 IL-6 和 IL-11 表达。
Reprod Biol. 2022 Jun;22(2):100608. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100608. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
7
The depot GnRH agonist protocol improves the live birth rate per fresh embryo transfer cycle, but not the cumulative live birth rate in normal responders: a randomized controlled trial and molecular mechanism study.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂扳机方案可提高新鲜胚胎移植周期的活产率,但不能提高正常反应者的累积活产率:一项随机对照试验及分子机制研究。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):1306-1318. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa086.
8
What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF?ART/IVF 中卵巢刺激不良反应者的最佳方案是什么?
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Apr 17;11:192. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00192. eCollection 2020.
9
Long-term effects and significant Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) associated with the use of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone analogs (GnRHa) for central precocious puberty: a brief review of literature.与使用促性腺激素释放激素类似物(GnRHa)治疗中枢性性早熟相关的长期影响和显著药物不良反应(ADR):文献简要综述
Acta Biomed. 2019 Sep 6;90(3):345-359. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i3.8736.
10
GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation.在控制性卵巢刺激中,对于卵巢反应正常的患者,使用 GnRH 拮抗剂与卵泡期单次剂量 GnRH 激动剂方案的比较。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Apr;35(4):309-313. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1528221. Epub 2018 Nov 15.