Habib Fatima, Khazaal Salma, Bou Yazbeck Elie, Debs Espérance, Sunoqrot Suhair, Louka Nicolas, El Darra Nada
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon.
Front Nutr. 2025 Apr 28;12:1559287. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1559287. eCollection 2025.
Food adulteration has emerged as a significant global issue, impacting consumer health and fair-trade practices. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and potential adulteration with starch in tomato paste products available in the Lebanese market. A total of 41 local and imported tomato paste samples, without starch declarations, were collected from the Lebanese market and analyzed for starch usage and various quality parameters (total soluble solids, Bostwick consistency, viscosity, titratable acidity, color, and dry matter content), as well as compliance with Libnor and Codex Alimentarius standards. Results revealed that 37% of samples failed to meet starch usage standards, and 27% did not comply with the required total soluble solids (>24%), while all samples complied with acidity standards (<7%). Compliant samples had significantly higher values for total soluble solids, acidity, dry matter, and color compared to non-compliant ones ( < 0.01). A comparison of local and imported tomato paste products showed no significant differences in physicochemical properties, color, shelf life, or price, with parameters being similar across samples. Among local samples, 48% did not comply with the starch usage standard, and 26% failed to meet the required total soluble solids level. In contrast, imported samples adhered to starch usage standards, although 30% did not comply with TSS levels. This study highlights the prevalence of adulteration in local and imported tomato paste products in Lebanon and calls for further enforcement measures to ensure consumer protection and fair trade.
食品掺假已成为一个重大的全球性问题,影响着消费者健康和公平贸易行为。本研究旨在评估黎巴嫩市场上番茄酱产品的质量以及是否存在淀粉掺假情况。从黎巴嫩市场收集了总共41个未标明含有淀粉的本地和进口番茄酱样本,分析其淀粉使用情况以及各种质量参数(总可溶性固形物、博斯托克稠度、粘度、可滴定酸度、颜色和干物质含量),并评估其是否符合黎巴嫩标准和食品法典标准。结果显示,37%的样本未达到淀粉使用标准,27%的样本不符合所需的总可溶性固形物含量标准(>24%),而所有样本均符合酸度标准(<7%)。与不符合标准的样本相比,符合标准的样本在总可溶性固形物、酸度、干物质和颜色方面的值显著更高(<0.01)。对本地和进口番茄酱产品的比较表明,它们在物理化学性质、颜色、保质期或价格方面没有显著差异,各样本的参数相似。在本地样本中,48%未符合淀粉使用标准,26%未达到所需的总可溶性固形物水平。相比之下,进口样本符合淀粉使用标准,尽管30%不符合总可溶性固形物水平。本研究突出了黎巴嫩本地和进口番茄酱产品中掺假现象的普遍性,并呼吁采取进一步的执法措施以确保消费者保护和公平贸易。