Sperling David C, Wallace Katrine, von Oppen Nanette, Weintraub Joshua L
Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sirtex Medical, Woburn, MA, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 May 8;17:387-392. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S492369. eCollection 2025.
In the wake of ever-increasing health care costs, solutions are sought to make health care more affordable, such as moving hospital outpatient procedures to office-based laboratory (OBL) settings. A budget impact model was constructed to estimate the health plan cost benefit of moving 50% of yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y-90) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) procedures for unresectable liver metastases associated with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) from a traditional hospital outpatient setting (HOPPS) to an OBL setting.
The eligible population was estimated using an incidence-based approach for a hypothetical health plan with 1 million covered lives. Modeled costs were based on 2024 Medicare reimbursement rates. Three treatment scenarios were considered: 1) base case HOPPS, 2) hybrid (HOPPS/OBL), and 3) OBL settings. Budget impacts were estimated as the differences in annual total cost of treatment after switching 50% of Y-90 SIRTs from HOPPS to the hybrid (HOPPS/OBL) or OBL setting. Per-member-per-month (PMPM) budget impacts were also calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the proportions of patients shifting settings and the treatment setting they were shifting into.
Annually, 28 patients were estimated to have metastatic CRC and unresectable liver metastases in a health plan of 1 million members. Average estimated per-patient cost savings would be $8,791 by switching one patient to a hybrid setting and $17,697 for a patient switched to the OBL. Switching 50% of eligible procedures resulted in PMPM cost benefits to the plan of $0.0102 for hybrid setting and $0.0206 for OBL. In sensitivity analyses, annual cost savings for the health plan were affected by both the proportion of patients shifted and the setting they were shifted into.
Shifting a percentage of the treatment of unresectable liver metastases with Y-90 SIRT to the OBL setting results in modest cost benefits for US health plans.
鉴于医疗保健成本不断增加,人们寻求各种解决方案以使医疗保健更具可承受性,例如将医院门诊手术转移至门诊实验室(OBL)环境。构建了一个预算影响模型,以估计将50%的钇-90树脂微球(Y-90)选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)用于与原发性结直肠癌(CRC)相关的不可切除肝转移的手术,从传统医院门诊环境(HOPPS)转移至OBL环境对健康计划成本效益的影响。
采用基于发病率的方法对一个拥有100万参保人员的假设健康计划的符合条件人群进行估计。模拟成本基于2024年医疗保险报销率。考虑了三种治疗场景:1)基础案例HOPPS,2)混合(HOPPS/OBL),以及3)OBL环境。预算影响估计为将50%的Y-90 SIRT从HOPPS转移至混合(HOPPS/OBL)或OBL环境后每年治疗总成本的差异。还计算了每人每月(PMPM)的预算影响。通过改变转移环境的患者比例以及他们转移到的治疗环境进行敏感性分析。
在一个拥有100万成员的健康计划中,估计每年有28名患者患有转移性CRC和不可切除的肝转移。将一名患者转移至混合环境平均估计每位患者可节省成本8791美元,转移至OBL环境则为17697美元。将50%的符合条件手术进行转移,对于混合环境该计划的PMPM成本效益为0.0102美元,对于OBL环境为0.0206美元。在敏感性分析中,健康计划的年度成本节省受到转移患者的比例以及他们转移到的环境的影响。
将一定比例的用Y-90 SIRT治疗不可切除肝转移的治疗转移至OBL环境,对美国健康计划有适度的成本效益。