Kıvrak Ahmet, Ateş Ahmet Hakan, Menemencioğlu Can, Doğan Mert, Şahiner Mehmet Levent, Kaya Ergün Barış, Aytemir Kudret
Department of Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 May 13;29(7):362-70. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5124.
Following the encouraging results of several registries and trials, transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become standard therapy for aortic stenosis patients with intermediate or high operative risk for surgical treatment. Good procedural success and good clinical outcomes have been shown, but very limited data exist on transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the setting of a preexisting mitral valve (MV) prosthesis regarding the technique, potential complications, and outcomes. Single-center experience is presented with this special patient cohort.
Here, 31 cases of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding bioprosthesis (CoreValve and Evolut R; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients who had previously undergone MV surgery have been reported. Preprocedural, intraprocedural, and post-procedural outcomes and data were analyzed.
Between February 2013 and December 2023, 31 patients with prior MV prostheses were included. The average age was 68.7 years, and 77.4% were female. Mechanical MV prostheses were present in 90.3% of patients. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeon score was 9.03. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed 14.75 years after MV replacement. Post-procedural complications included access site issues in 25.8% of patients, with 22.5% requiring pacemaker implantation. No procedural mortality occurred. Six out of 31 patients (n = 6/31 patients) died during follow-up, primarily due to respiratory complications, and the mean survival time was 74.9 ± 8.4 months (95% CI: 58.4-91.4).
The experiences showed that transfemoral implantation of a self-expanding aortic valve with MV prostheses patients, via the transfemoral route, is safe and feasible, with maintained long-term results.
在多个注册研究和试验取得令人鼓舞的结果后,经导管主动脉瓣植入术已成为手术治疗中、高手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者的标准治疗方法。已显示出良好的手术成功率和临床结果,但关于在已有二尖瓣(MV)人工瓣膜的情况下进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的技术、潜在并发症和结果的数据非常有限。本文介绍了这一特殊患者群体的单中心经验。
本文报告了31例先前接受过MV手术的患者经股动脉植入自膨式生物瓣膜(CoreValve和Evolut R;美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州,美国)行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的情况。对术前、术中和术后的结果及数据进行了分析。
2013年2月至2023年12月期间,纳入了31例先前有MV人工瓣膜的患者。平均年龄为68.7岁,77.4%为女性。90.3%的患者存在机械性MV人工瓣膜。胸外科医师协会平均评分为9.03。经导管主动脉瓣植入术在MV置换术后14.75年进行。术后并发症包括25.8%的患者出现穿刺部位问题,其中22.5%的患者需要植入起搏器。无手术死亡发生。31例患者中有6例(n = 6/31例患者)在随访期间死亡,主要原因是呼吸并发症,平均生存时间为74.9±8.4个月(95%CI:58.4 - 91.4)。
经验表明,对于有MV人工瓣膜的患者,经股动脉途径植入自膨式主动脉瓣是安全可行的,且长期效果良好。