• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对负压伤口治疗及参与伤口护理的偏好:一项定性研究。

Patient preference with regard to negative pressure wound therapy and participation in wound care: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Janssen Alexandra Hj, Wegdam Johannes A, Jaspar Alita, de Vries Reilingh Tammo S, Vermeulen Hester, Eskes Anne M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, the Netherlands.

MSc.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2025 May 2;34(5):340-349. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.0145.

DOI:10.12968/jowc.2022.0145
PMID:40358217
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experiences and preferences of patients with wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) regarding shared decision-making and patient participation.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adult patients treated with NPWT. Interview topics included shared decision-making and patients' active participation in wound treatment. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes.

RESULTS

The interview cohort comprised ten patients. Four themes emerged: (1) Having a wound makes patients uncertain and thus influences their quality of life; (2) NPWT influences patients' daily lives; (3) Patients consider professional treatment decisions most important in the decision-making processes; (4) Self-management of wounds is accepted by patients only for low-complexity and well-healing wounds under supervision. Participants emphasised their worries about the future and the impact of the wound/treatment on their families. After being thoroughly informed, participants preferred that health professionals decide on the treatment choice. In addition, participants and/or their relatives did not want to actively participate in complex wound care. As well as expressing a need for qualified wound care professionals, participants reported that they did not want to be or feel responsible for the wound treatment.

CONCLUSION

Shared decision-making and active patient participation are underused and underexposed topics in wound care. Patients' recognition of the importance of their personal preferences can facilitate shared decision-making.

摘要

目的

探讨接受负压伤口治疗(NPWT)的伤口患者在共同决策和患者参与方面的经历与偏好。

方法

对接受NPWT治疗的成年患者进行半结构化访谈。访谈主题包括共同决策和患者对伤口治疗的积极参与。采用主题分析法确定主题。

结果

访谈队列包括10名患者。出现了四个主题:(1)有伤口使患者感到不确定,从而影响其生活质量;(2)NPWT影响患者的日常生活;(3)患者认为专业治疗决策在决策过程中最为重要;(4)仅在监督下,对于低复杂性且愈合良好的伤口,患者才接受伤口的自我管理。参与者强调了他们对未来的担忧以及伤口/治疗对其家庭的影响。在得到充分告知后,参与者更倾向于由医疗专业人员决定治疗选择。此外,参与者和/或其亲属不想积极参与复杂的伤口护理。除了表达对合格伤口护理专业人员的需求外,参与者报告称他们不想对伤口治疗负责或感觉负有责任。

结论

共同决策和患者积极参与在伤口护理中未得到充分利用且未受到足够关注。患者认识到个人偏好的重要性有助于共同决策。

相似文献

1
Patient preference with regard to negative pressure wound therapy and participation in wound care: a qualitative study.患者对负压伤口治疗及参与伤口护理的偏好:一项定性研究。
J Wound Care. 2025 May 2;34(5):340-349. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.0145.
2
Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.产妇要求剖宫产:瑞典一项与共享决策和以患者为中心的护理相关的冲突定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 2;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z.
3
A Descriptive, Qualitative Study to Explore the Pain Experience During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Postsurgical Abdominal Wounds.一项探索腹部手术后伤口负压伤口治疗期间疼痛体验的描述性定性研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Dec;64(12):38-48.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Patients' preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients.患者对生命末期参与治疗决策的偏好:晚期癌症患者的定性访谈。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e100435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100435. eCollection 2014.
6
Patients' experiences of shared decision-making in nursing care: A qualitative study.患者在护理中参与决策的体验:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jun;33(6):2274-2286. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17032. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Effectiveness of interventions to enhance shared decision-making in wound care: A systematic review.干预措施在增强伤口护理中的共同决策效果:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):2813-2828. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17118. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
To become part of the team-patient experiences of participating in decision-making for a new treatment (proton beam therapy).参与新治疗方案(质子束疗法)决策的团队-患者体验。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 18;32(7):442. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08631-y.
10
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.负压伤口治疗在糖尿病患者足部伤口治疗中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 17;10(10):CD010318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3.