• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗后局部晚期直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Diagnostic accuracy of lateral lymph node metastasis for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ozaki Kosuke, Kawai Kazushige, Ogawa Shimpei, Kanemitsu Yukihide, Ajioka Yoichi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2025 Jul;25(7):821-827. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2506646. Epub 2025 May 15.

DOI:10.1080/14737140.2025.2506646
PMID:40358988
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal criteria for lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy remain undefined. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) to refine criteria for selective LLND.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (10 August 2024) identified studies assessing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based LLNM detection in patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgery. Studies reporting MRI-based LLNM assessments with pathological confirmation were included. Non-English studies, reviews, case reports, and those lacking lymph node size data were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were estimated using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. All used MRI-based size assessments. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.776 (95% CI: 0.639-0.872) and 0.694 (95% CI: 0.541-0.813), respectively, with an HSROC area under the curve (AUC) of 0.801.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is the most widely used modality for diagnosing LLNM in rectal cancer patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy, with size criteria being the most commonly applied.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42024578499).

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗后直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫(LLND)的最佳标准仍未明确。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了侧方淋巴结转移(LLNM)的诊断准确性,以完善选择性LLND的标准。

研究设计与方法

对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行系统检索(截至2024年8月10日),以确定评估接受新辅助治疗和根治性手术的直肠癌患者基于磁共振成像(MRI)检测LLNM的研究。纳入报告基于MRI的LLNM评估且有病理证实的研究。排除非英文研究、综述、病例报告以及缺乏淋巴结大小数据的研究。使用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险。采用分层汇总接受者操作特征曲线(HSROC)分析估计合并敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比。

结果

11项研究符合纳入标准。均采用基于MRI的大小评估。合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.776(95%CI:0.639-0.872)和0.694(95%CI:0.541-0.813),HSROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.801。

结论

MRI是诊断接受新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者LLNM最广泛使用的方法,大小标准是最常用的标准。

注册信息

PROSPERO(CRD42024578499)

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of lateral lymph node metastasis for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助治疗后局部晚期直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2025 Jul;25(7):821-827. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2506646. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和磁共振成像(MRI)在早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移评估中的应用:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta15040.
3
Diagnostic performance of MRI for assessing axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.MRI 评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结状态的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Feb;34(2):930-942. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10155-8. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term oncological outcomes of lateral lymph node dissection for metastatic nodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.系统评价和荟萃分析新辅助放化疗后直肠癌转移淋巴结侧方淋巴结清扫的长期肿瘤学结局。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul;48(7):1475-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.016. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
Prevalence of Metastatic Lateral Lymph Nodes in Asian Patients with Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.亚洲直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术患者转移性侧方淋巴结的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1537-1547. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05956-1. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接受新辅助放疗的直肠癌患者直肠切除术后的淋巴结获取情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
7
Detection of lymph node metastases by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis.镧系元素增强磁共振成像检测淋巴结转移:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 24;102(4):244-53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp514. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
8
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
9
Rise and fall of total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 11,366 patients.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术联合侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术的兴衰:一项 11366 例患者的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;36(11):2321-2333. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03946-2. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
10
Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.阴性前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描能否避免新诊断前列腺癌患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫?一项以病理组织学为参考标准的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Feb;5(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Sep 17.