Berg Carla J, Dekanosidze Ana, Owolabi Shade, Bundy Lucja, Liluashvili Levan, Gegenava Veriko, Grigoryan Lilit, Torosyan Arevik, Sargsyan Zhanna, Hayrumyan Varduhi, Kegler Michelle C
Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health; George Washington Cancer Center; George Washington University, 800 22nd St NW, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgia National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, 4 Kakheti Hwy, Tbilisi 0198, Georgia.
Health Promot Int. 2025 May 13;40(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf047.
Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) often require adaptation to be effective for new communities and/or cultural contexts. This paper describes the process for adapting an evidence-based smoke-free homes (SFHs) intervention to be culturally appropriate for households in Armenia and Georgia. The intervention, including three mailed packages ("mailings") and a coaching call, was adapted using a systematic multi-step adaptation process involving: (i) focus groups (n = 8) among adults in Armenia and Georgia, who smoked cigarettes or lived in a household with someone who smoked; (ii) consulting with in-country research team experts and local community leaders; and (iii) collaboratively deciding on critical adaptations, which differed slightly by country. Adaptations spanned across intervention components. While adaptations were largely surface-level (e.g. Armenia- and Georgia-relevant facts, color themes, imagery of individuals, homes, and settings), the process identified needed deep structure changes. For example, the nature of the challenges and solutions addressed, the narratives used for role modeling, and the imagery were adapted to better reflect the smoking-related social norms and dynamics (e.g. greater smoking prevalence among men vs. women, difficulty asking guests/elders to smoke outside), household composition (i.e. multigenerational), types of homes (e.g. ease of access to outdoor spaces), and types of tobacco used (i.e. heated tobacco products). The adapted interventions maintained the core elements and underlying theoretical approach but included adaptations to ensure cultural appropriateness and relevance. This should yield an effective intervention, which will be assessed next. The description of this multi-step adaptation process could inform future efforts to disseminate and implement EBIs across settings globally.
基于证据的干预措施(EBIs)通常需要进行调整,以使其在新的社区和/或文化背景下有效。本文描述了将基于证据的无烟家庭(SFHs)干预措施调整为在文化上适合亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚家庭的过程。该干预措施包括三个邮寄包裹(“邮件”)和一次指导电话,通过一个系统的多步骤调整过程进行了调整,该过程包括:(i)在亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的成年人中进行焦点小组访谈(n = 8),这些成年人吸烟或与吸烟者同住;(ii)咨询国内研究团队专家和当地社区领袖;(iii)共同决定关键的调整内容,不同国家的调整内容略有不同。调整涉及干预措施的各个组成部分。虽然调整主要是表面层面的(例如与亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚相关的事实、颜色主题、个人、家庭和场景的图像),但该过程确定了需要进行深层次结构的改变。例如,所解决的挑战和解决方案的性质、用于榜样示范的叙述以及图像都进行了调整,以更好地反映与吸烟相关的社会规范和动态(例如男性与女性吸烟率更高、要求客人/长辈在室外吸烟的困难)、家庭构成(即多代同堂)、房屋类型(例如进入室外空间的便利性)以及使用的烟草类型(即加热烟草制品)。调整后的干预措施保留了核心要素和基本理论方法,但进行了调整以确保文化适宜性和相关性。这应该会产生一个有效的干预措施,接下来将对其进行评估。对这个多步骤调整过程的描述可以为未来在全球范围内跨环境传播和实施基于证据的干预措施的努力提供参考。