• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示胆囊炎治疗的差异:一项全国性观察性研究的方案和统计分析计划——荷兰胆囊炎快照研究(荷兰CHESS)

Uncovering variation in cholecystitis treatment: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a nationwide observational study - the Dutch Cholecystitis Snapshot Study (Dutch CHESS).

作者信息

van Maasakkers Max H G, Weijs Teus J, Goense Lucas, van Lienden Krijn P, van Duijvendijk Peter, Verdonk Robert C, Boerma Djamila

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 May 13;15(5):e093821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093821.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093821
PMID:40360397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12083269/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cholecystitis is a highly prevalent disease that imposes a substantial burden on the healthcare system. Despite strong underlying evidence, guideline adherence in the treatment of cholecystitis remains low. Moreover, important gaps in knowledge persist that must be addressed to optimise existing guidelines. The primary aim is to assess the nationwide variation in cholecystitis treatment and identify opportunities to improve guideline adherence. Secondary aims include determining the best cystic duct closure method; the best model to predict concomitant choledocholithiasis; the optimal treatment for cholecystitis lasting 7 days or more at diagnosis and the optimal strategy for gallbladder drainage and post-drainage care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Dutch CHESS is a multicentre observational cohort study, including 67 out of 69 Dutch hospitals. From 1 April to 30 September 2024, all patients diagnosed with cholecystitis (Tokyo Guidelines definition) will be prospectively identified. Data on patient characteristics, treatment and outcome (with 6-month follow-up) will be collected to address the primary and secondary aims. For the primary aim, guideline adherence is defined as the percentage of patients who undergo early cholecystectomy for cholecystitis lasting 0-7 days. Current adherence, nationally and for each individual hospital, along with predictors of adherence, will be determined. The adherence of each hospital will be set against the national average and best practices. To further support improvement, the impact of guideline adherence on total hospital stay and morbidity will be determined. Three months after performance feedback to the participating hospitals, the impact on local practice will be assessed through questionnaires. Subgroup analyses and statistical methods for addressing both the primary and secondary aims are predefined in this protocol.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Medical research Ethics Committees United reviewed the protocol and decided that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act is not applicable (reference Number: W23.225). Approval was obtained from the institutional review board and board of directors at each participating hospital. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06349863; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

胆囊炎是一种高度流行的疾病,给医疗系统带来了沉重负担。尽管有充分的基础证据,但胆囊炎治疗中的指南遵循率仍然很低。此外,知识方面仍存在重要差距,必须加以解决以优化现有指南。主要目的是评估全国范围内胆囊炎治疗的差异,并确定提高指南遵循率的机会。次要目的包括确定最佳的胆囊管闭合方法;预测合并胆总管结石的最佳模型;诊断时胆囊炎持续7天或更长时间的最佳治疗方法,以及胆囊引流和引流后护理的最佳策略。

方法与分析

荷兰CHESS是一项多中心观察性队列研究,包括荷兰69家医院中的67家。从2024年4月1日至9月30日,将前瞻性地确定所有被诊断为胆囊炎(东京指南定义)的患者。将收集有关患者特征、治疗和结局(6个月随访)的数据,以实现主要和次要目的。对于主要目的,指南遵循率定义为因持续0至7天的胆囊炎而接受早期胆囊切除术的患者百分比。将确定全国和每家医院的当前遵循率以及遵循率的预测因素。每家医院的遵循率将与全国平均水平和最佳实践进行对比。为进一步支持改进,将确定指南遵循率对总住院时间和发病率的影响。在向参与医院提供绩效反馈三个月后,将通过问卷调查评估对当地实践的影响。本方案中预先定义了用于实现主要和次要目的的亚组分析和统计方法。

伦理与传播

联合医学研究伦理委员会审查了该方案,并决定荷兰涉及人类受试者的医学研究法案不适用(参考编号:W23.225)。已获得各参与医院的机构审查委员会和董事会的批准。结果将通过同行评审出版物和会议报告进行传播。

研究注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT06349863;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/12083269/a0f5fef5b5f1/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/12083269/a0f5fef5b5f1/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/12083269/a0f5fef5b5f1/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Uncovering variation in cholecystitis treatment: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a nationwide observational study - the Dutch Cholecystitis Snapshot Study (Dutch CHESS).揭示胆囊炎治疗的差异:一项全国性观察性研究的方案和统计分析计划——荷兰胆囊炎快照研究(荷兰CHESS)
BMJ Open. 2025 May 13;15(5):e093821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093821.
2
Safety and cost analysis of selective histopathological examination following appendicectomy and cholecystectomy (FANCY study): protocol and statistical analysis plan of a prospective observational multicentre study.阑尾切除术和胆囊切除术后选择性组织病理学检查的安全性和成本分析(FANCY研究):一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究的方案和统计分析计划
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e035912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035912.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Suboptimal care for chronic pancreatitis patients revealed by moderate to low adherence to the United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines (HaPanEU): A Netherlands nationwide analysis.中低程度遵循欧洲胃肠病学联合会循证指南对慢性胰腺炎患者的治疗不足:荷兰全国性分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Aug;8(7):764-774. doi: 10.1177/2050640620937610. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
Protocol of a multicentre, prospective cohort study that evaluates cost-effectiveness of two perioperative care strategies for potential obstructive sleep apnoea in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.多中心前瞻性队列研究方案,评估两种围手术期护理策略在肥胖症患者接受减重手术时潜在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):e038830. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038830.
6
Predictive factors associated with Bile culture positivity And phenotypiCal antIbiogram resistance patterns in patients taken to LaparOscopic cholecystectomy (BACILO): protocol for a prospective observational cohort study and development of a prognostic prediction model.与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(BACILO)患者胆汁培养阳性和表型抗菌谱耐药模式相关的预测因素:一项前瞻性观察队列研究和预后预测模型的制定方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e086655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086655.
7
Comparison of Emergency Cholecystectomy with Delayed Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage in Patients with Moderate Acute Cholecystitis.中度急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术后急诊胆囊切除术与延期胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):705-712. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0502. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊穿刺引流术治疗高危患者急性胆囊炎(CHOCOLATE):多中心随机临床试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 8;363:k3965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3965.
9
Prospective multicenter evaluation of adherence to the Dutch guideline for children aged 0-16 years with fever without a source-febrile illness in children (FINCH) study.前瞻性多中心评估荷兰儿童发热无明确病因(FINCH)指南对 0-16 岁儿童的依从性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jul;183(7):2921-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05553-z. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
10
Design and rationale of DUTCH-AF: a prospective nationwide registry programme and observational study on long-term oral antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation.DUTCH-AF 的设计与原理:一项关于心房颤动患者长期口服抗血栓治疗的前瞻性全国注册研究计划和观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 24;10(8):e036220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036220.

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
Asking informed consent may lead to significant participation bias and suboptimal cardiovascular risk management in learning healthcare systems.在学习型医疗保健系统中,获得知情同意可能导致重大的参与偏见和心血管风险管理效果不佳。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01924-6.
3
How should we secure the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A UK-wide survey of clinical practice and systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis.
在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,我们应该如何固定胆囊管?一项英国范围内的临床实践调查和文献系统评价,并进行荟萃分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Nov;104(9):650-654. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0264. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Choledocholithiasis in acute calculous cholecystitis: guidelines and beyond.急性结石性胆囊炎中的胆总管结石:指南及其他
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(2):247-252. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0562. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
5
2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.2020 年世界急诊外科学会更新了急性结石性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x.
6
A validated score predicting common bile duct stone in patients hospitalized with acute calculus cholecystitis: a multi-center retrospective study.一种经验证的评分系统,可用于预测因急性胆石性胆囊炎住院的患者的胆总管结石:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3709-3715. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07853-5. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Self-reported and actual adherence to the Tokyo guidelines in the European snapshot audit of complicated calculous biliary disease.在欧洲复杂胆石病的快照审核中,自我报告和实际遵循东京指南的情况。
BJS Open. 2020 Aug;4(4):622-629. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50294. Epub 2020 May 17.
8
Bile leakage after loop closure clip closure of the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆囊管套扎夹闭术后胆漏:一项前瞻性队列的回顾性分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan 27;12(1):9-16. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i1.9.
9
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis.ASGE 指南:内镜在胆石病评估和管理中的作用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
10
Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline.内镜下胆总管结石的处理:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2019 May;51(5):472-491. doi: 10.1055/a-0862-0346. Epub 2019 Apr 3.