Suppr超能文献

臭氧疗法作为牙周治疗的一种辅助方法。

Ozone therapy as a complementary approach in periodontal therapeutics.

作者信息

Sareen Shubham, Gupta Shipra, Goyal Lata

机构信息

Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.

Division of Periodontology, Department of dentistry, All India institute of medical sciences, Bhatinda, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Evid Based Dent. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01151-6.

Abstract

A COMMENTARY ON

Liu J, Huang Y, Huang J, Yang W, Tao R. Effects of ozone therapy as an adjuvant in the treatment of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2025; 25: 335.

DATA SOURCES

The authors conducted a systematic search across: 1. PubMed (MEDLINE); 2. Embase; 3. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Key question Does adjunctive ozone therapy improve periodontal clinical parameters (probing depth, gingival inflammation, bleeding, plaque levels, and attachment loss) in patients with chronic periodontitis compared to conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) alone? The study follows the PICO framework: 1.

POPULATION

Patients with chronic periodontitis; 2.

INTERVENTION

SRP + ozone therapy (ozonated water or gaseous ozone); 3. Comparison: SRP + placebo (e.g., saline, distilled water) or no adjunct; 4.

OUTCOMES

Probing depth (PD), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and clinical attachment level (CAL).

SEARCH STRATEGY

Combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free-text keywords related to ozone ("Ozone," "Ozonated water," "Gaseous ozone") and periodontitis ("Chronic periodontitis," "Periodontal therapy").

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria: Study Design: 1. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 2.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with chronic periodontitis (no systemic diseases or pregnancy). 3.

INTERVENTION

SRP + ozone therapy (either ozonated water irrigation or gaseous ozone insufflation). 4.

CONTROL

SRP + placebo (e.g., saline, distilled water) or no adjunct. 5.

OUTCOMES

At least one of the following-PD, GI, BOP, PI, or CAL.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Animal/in vitro studies; 2. Studies involving antibiotics, lasers, or other adjuncts; 3. Incomplete data or non-RCT designs. Screening process: 1. Initial Search: 99 records identified; 2. After Duplicate Removal: 62 studies screened; 3. Full-Text Review: 22 articles assessed, 13 met inclusion criteria. Final included studies: 1. 8 used ozonated water (concentration range: 2-85 μg/mL); 2. 5 used gaseous ozone (varying exposure times); 3. Follow-up periods: 4 weeks to 3 months.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data collection: 1. Two independent reviewers extracted data to minimize bias; 2. Extracted variables: study design, sample size, ozone concentration, application method, follow-up duration, and clinical outcomes.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

  1. Primary effect measure: weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). 2. Heterogeneity assessed via I statistic: (a) For Low (0-50%): Fixed-effects model was used. (b) For High (>50%): Random-effects model was applied. 3. Sensitivity Analysis: Excluded studies one by one to assess robustness. 4. Publication Bias: Evaluated via funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

  1. Probing Depth (PD) reduction: (a) 12 studies, 655 patients. (b) Significant improvement (WMD = -0.26 mm, P = 0.01). (c) Heterogeneity: High (I = 78%). (d) Interpretation: Ozone + SRP reduces pocket depth more than SRP alone, but variability in ozone application methods may influence results. 2. Gingival Index (GI) improvement: (a) 7 studies. (b) Significant reduction (WMD = -0.15, P = 0.0006). (c) Heterogeneity: Moderate (I = 48%). (d) Interpretation: Ozone reduces gingival inflammation, likely due to its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects. 3. Bleeding on Probing (BOP): (a) 6 studies. (b) No significant difference (P = 0.23). (c) Possible Reason: Bleeding is influenced by systemic factors (e.g., smoking, diabetes) not fully controlled in studies. 4. Plaque Index (PI) & Clinical Attachment Level (CAL): (a) No significant improvements (P > 0.05). (b) CAL Heterogeneity: High (I = 72%). (c) Interpretation: Ozone may not enhance plaque control or tissue regeneration beyond SRP alone.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Ozone therapy along with SRP is superior to SRP alone in reducing PD and GI, suggesting benefits in pocket depth and inflammation control. 2. No significant effects on BOP, PI, or CAL, indicating ozone may not improve all periodontal parameters. 3. Safe & well-tolerated: no adverse events reported.
摘要

关于以下文献的述评

刘J、黄Y、黄J、杨W、陶R。臭氧疗法作为辅助治疗牙周炎的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。《BMC口腔健康》2025年;25: 335。

数据来源

作者进行了全面系统的检索,检索数据库包括:1. PubMed(MEDLINE);2. Embase;3. 考克兰系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)。关键问题:与单纯的传统龈下刮治术(SRP)相比,辅助臭氧疗法是否能改善慢性牙周炎患者的牙周临床参数(探诊深度、牙龈炎症、出血、菌斑水平和附着丧失)?该研究遵循PICO框架:1.

研究对象

慢性牙周炎患者;2.

干预措施

SRP + 臭氧疗法(臭氧水或气态臭氧);3. 对照:SRP + 安慰剂(如生理盐水、蒸馏水)或无辅助治疗;4.

观察指标

探诊深度(PD)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊出血(BOP)、菌斑指数(PI)和临床附着水平(CAL)。

检索策略

结合医学主题词(MeSH)和与臭氧(“臭氧”、“臭氧水”、“气态臭氧”)及牙周炎(“慢性牙周炎”、“牙周治疗”)相关的自由文本关键词进行检索。

研究选择

纳入标准:研究设计:1. 仅纳入随机对照试验(RCT);2.

研究对象

患有慢性牙周炎的成年人(无全身性疾病或妊娠)。3.

干预措施

SRP + 臭氧疗法(臭氧水冲洗或气态臭氧吹入)。4.

对照

SRP + 安慰剂(如生理盐水、蒸馏水)或无辅助治疗。5.

观察指标

以下至少一项——PD、GI、BOP、PI或CAL。

排除标准

  1. 动物/体外研究;2. 涉及抗生素、激光或其他辅助治疗的研究;3. 数据不完整或非RCT设计。筛选过程:1. 初步检索:识别出99条记录;2. 去除重复记录后:筛选62项研究;3. 全文审查:评估22篇文章,13篇符合纳入标准。最终纳入研究:1. 8项使用臭氧水(浓度范围:2 - 85μg/mL);2. 5项使用气态臭氧(暴露时间不同);3. 随访期:4周 - 3个月。

数据提取与合成

数据收集:1. 两名独立评审员提取数据以尽量减少偏倚;2. 提取的变量:研究设计、样本量、臭氧浓度、应用方法、随访时间和临床结果。

统计分析

  1. 主要效应指标:加权均数差(WMD)及95%置信区间(CI)。2. 通过I统计量评估异质性:(a)低异质性(0 - 50%):采用固定效应模型。(b)高异质性(>50%):应用随机效应模型。3. 敏感性分析:逐一排除研究以评估结果的稳健性。4. 发表偏倚:通过漏斗图和Egger检验进行评估。

结果

  1. 探诊深度(PD)降低:(a)12项研究,655例患者。(b)有显著改善(WMD = -0.26mm,P = 0.01)。(c)异质性:高(I = 78%)。(d)解读:臭氧 + SRP比单纯SRP更能降低牙周袋深度,但臭氧应用方法的差异可能影响结果。2. 牙龈指数(GI)改善:(a)7项研究。(b)显著降低(WMD = -0.15,P = 0.0006)。(c)异质性:中度(I = 48%)。(d)解读:臭氧可减轻牙龈炎症,可能因其抗炎和抗菌作用。3. 探诊出血(BOP):(a)6项研究。(b)无显著差异(P = 0.23)。(c)可能原因:出血受全身因素(如吸烟、糖尿病)影响,而研究中未完全控制这些因素。4. 菌斑指数(PI)和临床附着水平(CAL):(a)无显著改善(P > 0.05)。(b)CAL异质性:高(I = 72%)。(c)解读:臭氧单独使用时可能不会比单纯SRP增强菌斑控制或组织再生效果。

结论

  1. 臭氧疗法联合SRP在降低PD和GI方面优于单纯SRP,提示在牙周袋深度和炎症控制方面有益。2. 对BOP、PI或CAL无显著影响,表明臭氧可能无法改善所有牙周参数。3. 安全且耐受性良好:未报告不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验