Sareen Shubham, Gupta Shipra, Goyal Lata
Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Division of Periodontology, Department of dentistry, All India institute of medical sciences, Bhatinda, Punjab, India.
Evid Based Dent. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01151-6.
Liu J, Huang Y, Huang J, Yang W, Tao R. Effects of ozone therapy as an adjuvant in the treatment of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2025; 25: 335.
The authors conducted a systematic search across: 1. PubMed (MEDLINE); 2. Embase; 3. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Key question Does adjunctive ozone therapy improve periodontal clinical parameters (probing depth, gingival inflammation, bleeding, plaque levels, and attachment loss) in patients with chronic periodontitis compared to conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) alone? The study follows the PICO framework: 1.
Patients with chronic periodontitis; 2.
SRP + ozone therapy (ozonated water or gaseous ozone); 3. Comparison: SRP + placebo (e.g., saline, distilled water) or no adjunct; 4.
Probing depth (PD), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and clinical attachment level (CAL).
Combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free-text keywords related to ozone ("Ozone," "Ozonated water," "Gaseous ozone") and periodontitis ("Chronic periodontitis," "Periodontal therapy").
Inclusion criteria: Study Design: 1. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 2.
Adults with chronic periodontitis (no systemic diseases or pregnancy). 3.
SRP + ozone therapy (either ozonated water irrigation or gaseous ozone insufflation). 4.
SRP + placebo (e.g., saline, distilled water) or no adjunct. 5.
At least one of the following-PD, GI, BOP, PI, or CAL.
Data collection: 1. Two independent reviewers extracted data to minimize bias; 2. Extracted variables: study design, sample size, ozone concentration, application method, follow-up duration, and clinical outcomes.
刘J、黄Y、黄J、杨W、陶R。臭氧疗法作为辅助治疗牙周炎的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。《BMC口腔健康》2025年;25: 335。
作者进行了全面系统的检索,检索数据库包括:1. PubMed(MEDLINE);2. Embase;3. 考克兰系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)。关键问题:与单纯的传统龈下刮治术(SRP)相比,辅助臭氧疗法是否能改善慢性牙周炎患者的牙周临床参数(探诊深度、牙龈炎症、出血、菌斑水平和附着丧失)?该研究遵循PICO框架:1.
慢性牙周炎患者;2.
SRP + 臭氧疗法(臭氧水或气态臭氧);3. 对照:SRP + 安慰剂(如生理盐水、蒸馏水)或无辅助治疗;4.
探诊深度(PD)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊出血(BOP)、菌斑指数(PI)和临床附着水平(CAL)。
结合医学主题词(MeSH)和与臭氧(“臭氧”、“臭氧水”、“气态臭氧”)及牙周炎(“慢性牙周炎”、“牙周治疗”)相关的自由文本关键词进行检索。
纳入标准:研究设计:1. 仅纳入随机对照试验(RCT);2.
患有慢性牙周炎的成年人(无全身性疾病或妊娠)。3.
SRP + 臭氧疗法(臭氧水冲洗或气态臭氧吹入)。4.
SRP + 安慰剂(如生理盐水、蒸馏水)或无辅助治疗。5.
以下至少一项——PD、GI、BOP、PI或CAL。
数据收集:1. 两名独立评审员提取数据以尽量减少偏倚;2. 提取的变量:研究设计、样本量、臭氧浓度、应用方法、随访时间和临床结果。