• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消化系统肿瘤中免疫检查点抑制剂的血液学毒性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析

Haematological toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors in digestive system tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Han Xinpu, Xu Jing, Cui Meichen, Yun Zhangjun, Zhao Hongbin, Tian Shaodan, Mi Suicai, Hou Li

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Hematology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Exp Med. 2025 May 13;25(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01688-x.

DOI:10.1007/s10238-025-01688-x
PMID:40360867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075026/
Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the hematologic toxicity profiles, toxicity spectrum, and safety rankings of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used for digestive system tumors. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was anemia, while secondary outcomes included neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased, leukopenia, white blood cell (WBC) count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and febrile neutropenia (FN). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor type, country category, study phase, ICI regimen, control group, chemotherapy regimen, ICI plus different chemotherapy regimens. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data according to pre-specified criteria, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.4 software was utilized to visualize the risk of bias assessments. Stata 16.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. 25 phase II and III RCTs (n = 15216) were included. The general safety of ICIs ranked from high to low for grade 1-5 anemia were as follows: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab. For grade 3-5 anemia, the general safety profile of the ICIs were as follows, from highest to lowest: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, and camrelizumab. Compared to chemotherapy, treatment-related hematologic toxicities with ICIs occurred primarily in grade 1-5 anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and WBC count decreased. Taking ICI monotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab were generally safer than taking chemotherapy, one ICI drug with chemotherapy, or two ICI drugs with chemotherapy. In terms of grade 1-5 hematologic toxicities, tislelizumab had the highest risk of neutropenia and leukopenia; the primary treatment-adverse events (AEs) for sintilimab was neutrophil count decreased and WBC count decreased; the primary treatment-related AE associated with nivolumab was platelet count decreased; camrelizumab posed the highest risk for lymphocyte count decreased. In terms of grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities, pembrolizumab was predominantly linked to neutropenia; sintilimab showed the greatest risk for neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and lymphocyte count decreased; avelumab was most associated with WBC count decreased. FN primarily manifested as grade 3-5, with camrelizumab having the highest risk. Among agents used in gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, avelumab demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for anemia. Each treatment regimen has its unique safety profile. Early identification and management of ICI-related hematologic toxicities are essential in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024571508.

摘要

本研究旨在全面评估用于消化系统肿瘤的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的血液学毒性特征、毒性谱及安全性排名。从数据库建立至2024年8月,系统检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和Embase数据库,以识别随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为贫血,次要结局包括中性粒细胞减少、中性粒细胞计数降低、血小板减少、血小板计数降低、白细胞减少、白细胞(WBC)计数降低、淋巴细胞计数降低和发热性中性粒细胞减少(FN)。基于肿瘤类型、国家类别、研究阶段、ICI方案、对照组、化疗方案、ICI加不同化疗方案进行亚组分析。两名研究者独立选择研究,根据预先指定的标准提取数据,并使用Cochrane协作偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。使用RevMan 5.4软件直观展示偏倚风险评估结果。使用Stata 16.0进行网络荟萃分析、敏感性分析和Meta回归。纳入了25项II期和III期RCT(n = 15216)。ICI 1 - 5级贫血的总体安全性从高到低依次为:阿维鲁单抗、纳武利尤单抗、帕博利珠单抗、信迪利单抗、卡瑞利珠单抗和替雷利珠单抗。对于3 - 5级贫血,ICI的总体安全性概况从高到低依次为:阿维鲁单抗、纳武利尤单抗、帕博利珠单抗、信迪利单抗和卡瑞利珠单抗。与化疗相比,ICI相关的血液学毒性主要发生在1 - 5级贫血、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、白细胞减少和WBC计数降低。采用ICI单药治疗时,纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗通常比化疗、一种ICI药物联合化疗或两种ICI药物联合化疗更安全。在1 - 5级血液学毒性方面,替雷利珠单抗发生中性粒细胞减少和白细胞减少的风险最高;信迪利单抗的主要治疗不良事件(AE)是中性粒细胞计数降低和WBC计数降低;与纳武利尤单抗相关的主要治疗相关AE是血小板计数降低;卡瑞利珠单抗导致淋巴细胞计数降低的风险最高。在3 - 5级血液学毒性方面,帕博利珠单抗主要与中性粒细胞减少有关;信迪利单抗在中性粒细胞计数降低、血小板计数降低和淋巴细胞计数降低方面风险最高;阿维鲁单抗与WBC计数降低关联最大。FN主要表现为3 - 5级,卡瑞利珠单抗风险最高。在用于胃癌或胃食管交界癌的药物中,阿维鲁单抗在贫血方面显示出最有利的安全性概况。每种治疗方案都有其独特的安全性特征。在临床实践中,早期识别和管理ICI相关的血液学毒性至关重要。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024571508。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/25f3434f957d/10238_2025_1688_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/b0fa02228620/10238_2025_1688_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/9c5972a838a8/10238_2025_1688_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/9cbb9712f460/10238_2025_1688_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/9db19c597e1c/10238_2025_1688_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/1caa59cd1f2b/10238_2025_1688_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/e82424dd7e23/10238_2025_1688_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/25f3434f957d/10238_2025_1688_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/b0fa02228620/10238_2025_1688_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/9c5972a838a8/10238_2025_1688_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/9cbb9712f460/10238_2025_1688_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/9db19c597e1c/10238_2025_1688_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/1caa59cd1f2b/10238_2025_1688_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/e82424dd7e23/10238_2025_1688_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa6/12075026/25f3434f957d/10238_2025_1688_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Haematological toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors in digestive system tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.消化系统肿瘤中免疫检查点抑制剂的血液学毒性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Clin Exp Med. 2025 May 13;25(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01688-x.
2
The safety of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.联合免疫检查点抑制剂和铂类化疗治疗实体瘤的安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 7;14:1062679. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1062679. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂在癌症中的比较安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 8;363:k4226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4226.
4
The Differences in the Safety and Tolerability of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Melanoma: Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗非小细胞肺癌和黑色素瘤的安全性和耐受性差异:网状Meta分析和系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 24;10:1260. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01260. eCollection 2019.
5
Hematologic side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy in patients with advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 trials.晚期和转移性胃肠道癌患者使用或不使用化疗的免疫检查点抑制剂的血液学副作用:一项对3期试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1163971. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1163971. eCollection 2023.
6
Immune checkpoint inhibitors chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗作为晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的二线治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 28;17:17562848241233134. doi: 10.1177/17562848241233134. eCollection 2024.
7
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与含或不含贝伐珠单抗的一线含铂化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub2.
8
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与一线含或不含贝伐珠单抗的铂类化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 30;4(4):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub3.
9
A Network Comparison on Safety Profiling of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Cancer.免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期肺癌中的安全性特征网络比较。
Front Immunol. 2021 Dec 3;12:760737. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.760737. eCollection 2021.
10
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with or without PD-L1 selection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗有无 PD-L1 选择的晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Sep 20;136(18):2156-2165. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002750. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for stage III gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection (ATTRACTION-5): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.辅助纳武利尤单抗联合化疗对比安慰剂联合化疗用于 D2 或更广泛淋巴结清扫术后的 III 期胃癌或胃食管结合部癌(ATTRACTION-5):一项随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照的 III 期临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug;9(8):705-717. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00156-0. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
First-Line Nivolumab and Relatlimab Plus Chemotherapy for Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: The Phase II RELATIVITY-060 Study.纳武利尤单抗和雷莫芦单抗联合化疗治疗胃或胃食管结合部腺癌:RELATIVITY-060 期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 10;42(17):2080-2093. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01636. Epub 2024 May 9.
3
Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy for Unresectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The ORIENT-16 Randomized Clinical Trial.信迪利单抗联合化疗治疗不可切除的胃或胃食管结合部癌:ORIENT-16 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Dec 5;330(21):2064-2074. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.19918.
4
Hematologic and lymphatic system toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world study.免疫检查点抑制剂相关的血液学和淋巴系统毒性:一项真实世界研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 31;14:1213608. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1213608. eCollection 2023.
5
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-859): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗对比安慰剂联合化疗用于 HER2 阴性晚期胃癌(KEYNOTE-859):一项多中心、随机、双盲、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Nov;24(11):1181-1195. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00515-6. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
6
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗对比安慰剂联合化疗用于治疗晚期或转移性食管鳞癌(RATIONALE-306):一项全球性、随机、安慰剂对照、III 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 May;24(5):483-495. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00108-0. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂与单纯吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌患者的比较(KEYNOTE-966):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2023 Jun 3;401(10391):1853-1865. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
8
Hematologic side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy in patients with advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 trials.晚期和转移性胃肠道癌患者使用或不使用化疗的免疫检查点抑制剂的血液学副作用:一项对3期试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1163971. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1163971. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparing a PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced ESCC: a randomized Phase II clinical trial : A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant therapy for ESCC.比较 PD-L1 抑制剂联合化疗与单纯化疗在局部晚期 ESCC 新辅助治疗中的疗效:一项随机 II 期临床试验:一项 ESCC 新辅助治疗的随机临床试验。
BMC Med. 2023 Mar 8;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02804-y.
10
First-line serplulimab or placebo plus chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial.一线赛普利单抗或安慰剂联合化疗治疗 PD-L1 阳性食管鳞癌:一项随机、双盲、III 期临床试验。
Nat Med. 2023 Feb;29(2):473-482. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02179-2. Epub 2023 Feb 2.