Alejo Elena, Agulló Cristina, Puertas Borja, Eiros Rocío, Rey-Búa Beatriz, Barnés Carmen, Rodríguez-González Marta, López-Corral Lucía, Santos-Briz Ángel, Escalante Fernando, Pérez-García María-Luisa, Jiménez-Cabrera Silvia, Gutiérrez Norma C, Puig Noemi, Mateos María-Victoria, González-Calle Verónica
Hematology Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Cancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), CIBERONC, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Biochemestry Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;17(9):1440. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091440.
: Daratumumab-based regimens represent the gold-standard therapy for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients. However, there are few studies about the efficacy of this treatment in real life. : This study included 99 patients: 27 (27.3%) received daratumumab and proteasome inhibitor-based schemes, 46 (46.4%) were treated with proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulator-based regimens, and 26 (26.3%) were treated with chemotherapy. : Patients receiving daratumumab and proteasome inhibitor-based regimens achieved higher rates of partial haematological responses or better (100.0% vs. 78.3% vs. 58.3%; = 0.009 and < 0.001) and complete responses (74.1% vs. 37.0% vs. 12.5%; = 0.003 and < 0.001) than the proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulators and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Daratumumab and proteasome inhibitor-based schemes resulted in a shorter time to haematological response (1 month to partial response or better and 4 months to complete response). Moreover, in the group treated with daratumumab and proteasome inhibitor-based regimens, there was a trend of obtaining better and faster organ responses. The benefit of daratumumab and proteasome inhibitor-based regimens was that they resulted in an improvement in progression-free survival (not reached) compared to the proteasome inhibitor and chemotherapy groups (18 months; = 0.022 and 6 months; = 0.002). In addition, the clinical benefit was consistent in patients with Mayo Clinic stages III-IV. : This study supports the efficacy and superiority of adding daratumumab to the frontline treatment over proteasome inhibitor-based regimens and chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis, including in advanced cardiac disease.
基于达雷妥尤单抗的治疗方案是新诊断的 AL 淀粉样变性患者的金标准治疗方法。然而,关于这种治疗在现实生活中的疗效的研究很少。:本研究纳入了 99 名患者:27 名(27.3%)接受了基于达雷妥尤单抗和蛋白酶体抑制剂的方案,46 名(46.4%)接受了基于蛋白酶体抑制剂和/或免疫调节剂的方案治疗,26 名(26.3%)接受了化疗。:接受基于达雷妥尤单抗和蛋白酶体抑制剂方案的患者获得部分血液学反应或更好反应的比例更高(100.0% 对 78.3% 对 58.3%;P = 0.009 且 P < 0.001),完全缓解率也更高(74.1% 对 37.0% 对 12.5%;P = 0.003 且 P < 0.001),分别高于蛋白酶体抑制剂和/或免疫调节剂组以及化疗组。基于达雷妥尤单抗和蛋白酶体抑制剂的方案导致血液学反应时间更短(部分反应或更好反应为 1 个月,完全缓解为 4 个月)。此外,在接受基于达雷妥尤单抗和蛋白酶体抑制剂方案治疗的组中,有获得更好更快器官反应的趋势。基于达雷妥尤单抗和蛋白酶体抑制剂方案的益处在于,与蛋白酶体抑制剂组和化疗组相比(分别为 18 个月;P = 0.022 和 6 个月;P = 0.002),它们使无进展生存期得到改善(未达到)。此外,梅奥诊所 III-IV 期患者的临床获益是一致的。:本研究支持在 AL 淀粉样变性,包括晚期心脏疾病中,在一线治疗中添加达雷妥尤单抗相较于基于蛋白酶体抑制剂的方案和化疗的疗效和优越性。