• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对协调护理的看法:使用患者报告体验指标(PREMs)在实施阶段的初步结果。

Patient Perspectives on Coordinated Care: Preliminary Results from the Implementation Stage Using Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs).

作者信息

Wieczorek-Wójcik Beata, Milewska Anna Justyna, Kilańska Dorota, Kulma-Pytlak Aneta, Iltchev Peter, Gaworska-Krzemińska Aleksandra, Kozlowski Remigiusz

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Medical Rescue, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Westerplatte Street 64, 76-200 Słupsk, Poland.

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Medical University of Białystok, 15-295 Białystok, Poland.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;13(9):1026. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091026.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13091026
PMID:40361804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12071257/
Abstract

Integrated health services are health services that are managed and delivered in a way that ensures patients receive a continuum of health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment, disease management, rehabilitation, and palliative care services at different levels and sites of care within the health system, and according to their needs, throughout their life course. Assessing the effectiveness of their implementation, the perspective of the process participant-the patient-is examined. There are three main types of patient-reported measures: PROM, PREM and HLS. PREM (patient-reported experience measure) is a tool that allows the objective measurement of the patient's experience related to healthcare services, for instance, the timeliness of visits or receiving recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the coordinated care experienced by patients (PREMs) before and after the introduction of coordinated care, using the JOP-POP tool as a key measure. This longitudinal study was conducted in two stages. The first stage concerned the joining of the coordinated care program by the entity in which the study was conducted; the study was repeated six months after joining coordinated care (CC). At each stage of the study, the study group included 40 patients. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the normality of the distribution of quantitative variables. For statistical analysis, the Wilcoxon test for paired samples was used to compare two ordinal dependent variables. For independent variables, the Mann-Whitney and the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA by ranks tests were used, with a post hoc test of multiple comparisons of mean ranks. A statistically significant relationship ( = 0.00157) was observed between the number of chronic diseases and health status assessment before inclusion in coordinated care. The patients' responses showed statistically significant improvement 6 months after the introduction of coordinated care (CC). The improvement in assessment was related to the time physicians spent with patients. The greatest improvement over 6 months was achieved in coordination of care and the smallest improvement was noted in the approach to the patient. The JOP-POP tool may be useful in future studies to assess patients' experiences with implementing coordinated care.

摘要

综合健康服务是指以一种确保患者在卫生系统内不同层次和地点的医疗服务中,根据自身需求在整个生命历程中获得连续的健康促进、疾病预防、诊断、治疗、疾病管理、康复和姑息治疗服务的方式进行管理和提供的健康服务。在评估其实施效果时,会考察过程参与者——患者的视角。患者报告的测量主要有三种类型:患者报告结局(PROM)、患者报告体验测量(PREM)和健康素养量表(HLS)。患者报告体验测量(PREM)是一种工具,可客观测量患者与医疗服务相关的体验,例如就诊的及时性或接受建议的情况。本研究的目的是使用JOP - POP工具作为关键指标,评估引入协调护理前后患者所体验到的协调护理(PREM)情况。这项纵向研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段涉及开展研究的实体加入协调护理项目;在加入协调护理(CC)六个月后重复该研究。在研究的每个阶段,研究组包括40名患者。使用夏皮罗 - 威尔克检验来验证定量变量分布的正态性。对于统计分析,使用配对样本的威尔科克森检验来比较两个有序因变量。对于自变量,使用曼 - 惠特尼检验和秩和检验的克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯方差分析,并进行平均秩的多重比较的事后检验。在纳入协调护理之前,观察到慢性病数量与健康状况评估之间存在统计学显著关系(= 0.00157)。引入协调护理(CC)六个月后,患者的反应显示出统计学上的显著改善。评估的改善与医生与患者相处的时间有关。在六个月内,护理协调方面取得的改善最大,而在对待患者的方式方面改善最小。JOP - POP工具在未来评估患者实施协调护理体验的研究中可能会有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/c1cc6a4c3211/healthcare-13-01026-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/6fb5ddd11c73/healthcare-13-01026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/c88cdeb0b76d/healthcare-13-01026-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/39d751286720/healthcare-13-01026-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/b47896f52598/healthcare-13-01026-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/a8143209607b/healthcare-13-01026-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/1506e6b3b15c/healthcare-13-01026-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/c293fe78d4a9/healthcare-13-01026-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/25e84e438365/healthcare-13-01026-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/c1cc6a4c3211/healthcare-13-01026-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/6fb5ddd11c73/healthcare-13-01026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/c88cdeb0b76d/healthcare-13-01026-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/39d751286720/healthcare-13-01026-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/b47896f52598/healthcare-13-01026-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/a8143209607b/healthcare-13-01026-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/1506e6b3b15c/healthcare-13-01026-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/c293fe78d4a9/healthcare-13-01026-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/25e84e438365/healthcare-13-01026-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee9/12071257/c1cc6a4c3211/healthcare-13-01026-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Perspectives on Coordinated Care: Preliminary Results from the Implementation Stage Using Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs).患者对协调护理的看法:使用患者报告体验指标(PREMs)在实施阶段的初步结果。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;13(9):1026. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091026.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Which Factors Are Associated With Satisfaction With Treatment Results in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions? A Large Cohort Analysis.哪些因素与手部和腕部疾病患者对治疗结果的满意度相关?一项大型队列分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1287-1301. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002107. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks.常规围产期护理中的 PROMs 和 PREMs:将其纳入综合产科护理网络的实施情况的混合方法评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00568-w.
5
Evaluating the Population-Based Usage and Benefit of Digitally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences in Patients With Chronic Diseases: The PROMchronic Study Protocol.评估慢性病患者中基于人群的数字化患者报告结局和体验的使用情况和获益:PROMchronic 研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 5;13:e56487. doi: 10.2196/56487.
6
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Perspectives of inpatients with palliative care needs, their families, clinicians and key stakeholders on measuring quality of hospital care via patient experience measures: A qualitative study.有姑息治疗需求的住院患者、他们的家属、临床医生和主要利益相关者对通过患者体验措施衡量医院护理质量的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1498-1508. doi: 10.1177/02692163231209845. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Psychometric evaluation of patient-reported experience measures for peri-anesthesia care: A systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines.围麻醉期护理患者报告体验测量指标的心理测量学评价:一项基于COSMIN指南的系统评价
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Jan;161:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104930. Epub 2024 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Experiences and Perceptions of Care Coordination in Primary Care.患者在初级保健中对医疗协调的体验和看法。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2024;39(3):239-245. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000759. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
2
Influence of Participation in a Medical-Themed Science Café on Patient Activation.参与医学主题科学咖啡馆对患者激活的影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Nov 28;17:3093-3106. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S424460. eCollection 2023.
3
Does value-based healthcare support patient-centred care? A scoping review of the evidence.基于价值的医疗保健是否支持以患者为中心的护理?证据的范围审查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 10;13(7):e070193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070193.
4
Impact of digital technologies on self-efficacy in people with Parkinson's: a scoping review protocol.数字技术对帕金森病患者自我效能影响的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 23;13(3):e069929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069929.
5
Effectiveness of nurse-led services for people with chronic disease in achieving an outcome of continuity of care at the primary-secondary healthcare interface: A quantitative systematic review.护士主导的慢性病患者服务在实现初级-二级医疗保健界面连续性护理结果方面的有效性:一项定量系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103986. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
Value-Based Healthcare Initiatives in Practice: A Systematic Review.基于价值的医疗保健实践倡议:系统评价。
J Healthc Manag. 2021 Jun 29;66(5):340-365. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-20-00283.
7
Systematic Review of Care Coordination Interventions Linking Health and Social Services for High-Utilizing Patient Populations.高利用率患者人群的卫生与社会服务相衔接的照护协调干预措施的系统评价。
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Feb;25(1):73-85. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0057. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
Ensuring Quality in the Era of Virtual Care.在虚拟医疗时代确保质量。
JAMA. 2021 Feb 2;325(5):429-430. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.24955.
9
Virtual Care, Telemedicine Visits, and Real Connection in the Era of COVID-19: Unforeseen Opportunity in the Face of Adversity.COVID-19 时代的虚拟护理、远程医疗就诊与真实连接:逆境中的意外机遇
JAMA. 2021 Feb 2;325(5):437-438. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.27304.
10
Changes in health-related quality of life before and after a 12-month enhanced primary care model among chronically ill primary care patients in Australia.澳大利亚慢性病初级保健患者接受强化初级保健模式前后健康相关生活质量的变化。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Aug 24;18(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01539-1.