• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规围产期护理中的 PROMs 和 PREMs:将其纳入综合产科护理网络的实施情况的混合方法评估。

PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KE.04.123.1, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00568-w.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-023-00568-w
PMID:36894797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9998006/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the transition towards value-based healthcare, patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) are recommended by international collaborations and government programs to guide clinical practice and quality improvement. For many conditions, using PROM/PREM over the complete continuum of care requires implementation across care organizations and disciplines. Along PROM/PREM implementation in obstetric care networks (OCN), we aimed to evaluate implementation outcomes and the processes influencing these outcomes in the complex context of care networks across the continuum of perinatal care.

METHODS

Three OCN in the Netherlands implemented PROM/PREM in routine practice, using an internationally developed outcomes set with care professionals and patient advocates. Their aim was to use PROM/PREM results individually to guide patient-specific care decisions and at group-level to improve quality of care. The implementation process was designed following the principles of action research: iteratively planning implementation, action, data generation and reflection to refine subsequent actions, involving both researchers and care professionals. During the one-year implementation period in each OCN, implementation outcomes and processes were evaluated in this mixed-methods study. Data generation (including observation, surveys and focus groups) and analysis were guided by two theoretical implementation frameworks: the Normalization Process Theory and Proctor's taxonomy for implementation outcomes. Qualitative findings were supplemented with survey data to solidify findings in a broader group of care professionals.

RESULTS

Care professionals in OCN found the use of PROM/PREM acceptable and appropriate, recognized their benefits and felt facilitated in their patient-centered goals and vision. However, feasibility for daily practice was low, mainly due to IT issues and time constraints. Hence PROM/PREM implementation did not sustain, but strategies for future PROM/PREM implementation were formulated in all OCN. Processes contributing positively to implementation outcomes were internalization (understand the value) and initiation (driven by key-participants), whereas challenges in relational integration (maintain confidence) and reconfiguration (refine activities) affected implementation negatively.

CONCLUSION

Although implementation did not sustain, network-broad PROM/PREM use in clinic and quality improvement matched professionals' motivation. This study provides recommendations to implement PROM/PREM meaningfully in practice in ways that support professionals in their drive towards patient-centered care. In order for PROM/PREM to fulfill their potential for value-based healthcare, our work highlights the need for sustainable IT infrastructures, as well as an iterative approach to refine their complex implementation into local contexts.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ea/9998767/544f5bb247e5/41687_2023_568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ea/9998767/544f5bb247e5/41687_2023_568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ea/9998767/544f5bb247e5/41687_2023_568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

在向基于价值的医疗保健转变的过程中,国际合作和政府项目建议使用患者报告的结果和体验测量(PROM 和 PREM)来指导临床实践和质量改进。对于许多疾病,在整个护理连续体中使用 PROM/PREM 需要在护理组织和学科之间进行实施。在产科护理网络(OCN)中实施 PROM/PREM 时,我们旨在评估实施结果以及影响这些结果的过程,这些结果是在整个围产期护理连续体的复杂护理网络背景下进行的。

方法

荷兰的三个 OCN 在护理专业人员和患者倡导者的共同努力下,使用国际上开发的结果集,在常规实践中实施 PROM/PREM。他们的目标是单独使用 PROM/PREM 结果来指导针对患者的护理决策,并在组级水平上提高护理质量。实施过程遵循行动研究的原则:迭代规划实施、行动、生成数据和反思,以改进后续行动,同时涉及研究人员和护理专业人员。在每个 OCN 的为期一年的实施期间,本混合方法研究评估了实施结果和过程。数据生成(包括观察、调查和焦点小组)和分析由两个理论实施框架指导:正常化过程理论和 Proctor 的实施结果分类法。定性研究结果补充了调查数据,以在更广泛的护理专业人员群体中巩固研究结果。

结果

OCN 的护理专业人员认为使用 PROM/PREM 是可以接受和适当的,他们认识到了其益处,并认为这有助于他们实现以患者为中心的目标和愿景。然而,日常实践的可行性很低,主要是由于 IT 问题和时间限制。因此,PROM/PREM 的实施没有持续下去,但所有 OCN 都制定了未来实施 PROM/PREM 的策略。对实施结果产生积极影响的过程是内化(理解价值)和启动(由关键参与者驱动),而在关系整合(保持信心)和重新配置(改进活动)方面的挑战则对实施产生了负面影响。

结论

尽管实施没有持续下去,但在诊所和质量改进方面的网络广泛使用 PROM/PREM 与专业人员的动机相匹配。本研究为在实践中以支持专业人员向以患者为中心的护理方向发展的方式有意义地实施 PROM/PREM 提供了建议。为了使 PROM/PREM 能够发挥其在基于价值的医疗保健中的潜力,我们的工作强调需要可持续的 IT 基础设施,以及迭代方法来完善其在本地环境中的复杂实施。

相似文献

1
PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks.常规围产期护理中的 PROMs 和 PREMs:将其纳入综合产科护理网络的实施情况的混合方法评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00568-w.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Perinatal Care to Guide Clinical Practice: Prospective Observational Study.围产期护理中用于指导临床实践的患者报告结局和体验测量:前瞻性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 5;24(7):e37725. doi: 10.2196/37725.
3
Women's experiences with using patient-reported outcome and experience measures in routine perinatal care in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study.荷兰常规围产期护理中使用患者报告的结局和体验测量工具的女性体验:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 10;13(3):e064452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064452.
4
Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings.采用实施科学方法在常规护理环境中实施和评估患者报告的结果测量(PROM)措施。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3015-3033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
A feasibility study of implementing a patient-centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth.实施以患者为中心的妊娠和分娩结局集的可行性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 26;3(3):e168. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.168. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis.影响个体层面患者为中心的结局测量(PROM)和患者报告的体验测量(PREM)数据在各实践环境中实施的医疗服务提供者特征:一项混合方法系统评价的方案,采用叙述性综合方法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2.
7
A qualitative study to identify thematic areas for HIV related patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM).一项定性研究,旨在确定与 HIV 相关的患者报告结局测量(PROM)和患者报告体验测量(PREM)的主题领域。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 May 1;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00582-y.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Validation of novel patient-centred juvenile idiopathic arthritis-specific patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs).新型以患者为中心的青少年特发性关节炎特异性患者报告结局和体验测量(PROMs/PREMs)的验证。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020 Nov 19;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00481-2.
10
Uptake of pediatric patient-reported outcome and experience measures and challenges associated with their implementation in Alberta: a mixed-methods study.在艾伯塔省,采用儿科患者报告结局和体验测量方法及其实施面临的挑战:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04169-w.

引用本文的文献

1
First Experiences of Patients and Healthcare Professionals with Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Venous Thromboembolism.患者和医护人员常规使用静脉血栓栓塞症患者报告结局测量的首次体验
TH Open. 2025 May 23;9:a26007707. doi: 10.1055/a-2600-7707. eCollection 2025.
2
'Great in theory': Women's care experiences in relation to Australia's national maternity Strategy-Qualitative survey responses.“理论上很棒”:女性在澳大利亚国家孕产妇战略方面的护理体验——定性调查回应
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0319249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319249. eCollection 2025.
3
Do We Have the Evidence to Produce Tools to Enable the Identification and Personalization of Management of Women's Pelvic Floor Health Disorders Through the Perinatal and Perimenopausal Periods? ICI-RS 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's experiences with using patient-reported outcome and experience measures in routine perinatal care in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study.荷兰常规围产期护理中使用患者报告的结局和体验测量工具的女性体验:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 10;13(3):e064452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064452.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Perinatal Care to Guide Clinical Practice: Prospective Observational Study.围产期护理中用于指导临床实践的患者报告结局和体验测量:前瞻性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 5;24(7):e37725. doi: 10.2196/37725.
3
Patient reported outcome assessment must be inclusive and equitable.
我们是否有证据来开发工具,以实现对围产期和围绝经期女性盆底健康障碍的识别和个性化管理?ICI-RS 2024。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Mar;44(3):651-660. doi: 10.1002/nau.70019. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
4
A Spanish-Language Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Trust in Pregnancy Care Clinician.一份用于衡量患者对孕期护理临床医生信任度的西班牙语患者报告结局量表。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2460465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60465.
5
Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals.评估患者报告结局测量(PROMs)和医护人员报告结局测量(PREMs)在常规临床护理中的实施情况:从患者和医护人员角度进行工具的联合设计。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Feb 17;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02333-7.
6
Surgical patient-reported experience measures and qualitative experience studies: systematic review.手术患者报告的体验指标及质性体验研究:系统评价
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae142.
7
Roles of different organizations in implementing patient-reported measures in routine maternity care in Finland.芬兰在常规产科护理中实施患者报告的测量措施中不同组织的作用。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Oct 3;8(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00793-x.
8
Psychosocial factors contributing to value creation in value-based healthcare: a scoping review.基于价值的医疗保健中促进价值创造的社会心理因素:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 9;15:1323110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1323110. eCollection 2024.
9
Woman-Centered Care: Standardized Outcomes Measure.以女性为中心的护理:标准化结局指标。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 25;59(9):1537. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091537.
10
Introducing standard patient-reported measures (PRMs) into routine maternity care: A pre-implementation qualitative study on women's perspectives in Finland.将标准化患者报告结局(PROs)引入常规产科护理:芬兰妇女视角的实施前定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09818-5.
患者报告的结局评估必须具有包容性和平等性。
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1120-1124. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01781-8.
4
Intentions to leave and actual turnover of community midwives in the Netherlands: A mixed method study exploring the reasons why.社区助产士离开意向与实际离职率的荷兰混合方法研究:探索离职原因。
Women Birth. 2022 Nov;35(6):e573-e582. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
How Different Quality Paradigms Undermine a Shared Value Base for Integrated Care: The Need for Collective Reflexivity.不同质量范式如何破坏综合护理的共享价值基础:集体反思的必要性。
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5935. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
6
Understanding the complexities of collecting and using PRO data in a primary care context.理解在初级保健环境中收集和使用患者报告结局(PRO)数据的复杂性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):175-178. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013315. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
7
Facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: An academic center's initial experience.在临床护理中实施患者报告结局测量的促进因素和障碍:学术中心的初步经验。
Health Policy. 2021 Sep;125(9):1247-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
Using human centered design to identify opportunities for reducing inequities in perinatal care.运用以人为中心的设计方法,寻找减少围产期保健服务中不公平现象的机会。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):714. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06609-8.
9
A qualitative study on professionals' attitudes and views towards the introduction of patient reported measures into public maternity care pathway.一项关于专业人士对将患者报告的测量指标引入公共产科学路径的态度和看法的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06658-z.
10
Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis.影响个体层面患者为中心的结局测量(PROM)和患者报告的体验测量(PREM)数据在各实践环境中实施的医疗服务提供者特征:一项混合方法系统评价的方案,采用叙述性综合方法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2.