Mohammad Azmi Nabil, Gopal Prem Kumar, Abdul Jalal Muhammad Irfan, Ismail Mazian, Fadzil Farizal
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
UKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute (UMBI), The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;15(9):1126. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091126.
Endo-Wing™ is a soft silicone device with six wing-like projections attached at the end of the colonoscope that provides superior visualization by flattening the colonic fold and helps to maintain a central view of the colonoscope during withdrawal. This study aims to compare the adenoma detection rate (ADR) between standard colonoscopy and Endo-Wing™-assisted colonoscopy. This is a single-center, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized, actively controlled, exploratory clinical trial conducted between July 2019 and April 2020. Participants aged 45 and above who were symptomatic of colorectal cancer (CRC) or with a history of adenoma and under active surveillance were included. Exclusion criteria included colonic strictures, tumors, active colitis, a previous history of polyposis syndrome, colostomy/ileostomy, or a BPPS score of 0. Participants were subsequently randomized to receive standard colonoscopy ( = 96) or Endo-Wing™-assisted colonoscopy ( = 96) at a 1:1 ratio using a central block randomization method with varying block sizes. The primary endpoint was the ADR, and the differences between the two groups were evaluated using univariable statistical methods. The ADR, the number of adenomas, and the size of adenomas in the Endo-Wing™-assisted colonoscopy group were significantly higher compared to standard colonoscopy ( = 0.005, 0.035, and 0.035, respectively). Cecal intubation rates were similar in both groups ( > 0.999). The proportions of colonoscopy requiring increased sedation and standard sedation were similar in both groups ( = 0.613). No adverse effects of bleeding, perforation, and device dislodgement were reported in both groups. This study concludes that Endo-Wing™-assisted colonoscopy improves the ADR compared to standard colonoscopy.
Endo-Wing™是一种柔软的硅胶装置,在结肠镜末端附有六个翼状突起,通过展平结肠皱襞提供卓越的视野,并有助于在退镜过程中保持结肠镜的中心视野。本研究旨在比较标准结肠镜检查与Endo-Wing™辅助结肠镜检查之间的腺瘤检出率(ADR)。这是一项单中心、单盲、平行组、随机、积极对照的探索性临床试验,于2019年7月至2020年4月进行。纳入年龄在45岁及以上、有结直肠癌(CRC)症状或有腺瘤病史且正在接受积极监测的参与者。排除标准包括结肠狭窄、肿瘤、活动性结肠炎、既往息肉病综合征病史、结肠造口术/回肠造口术或BPPS评分为0。随后,采用中心区组随机化方法,以1:1的比例将参与者随机分为接受标准结肠镜检查(n = 96)或Endo-Wing™辅助结肠镜检查(n = 96),区组大小不同。主要终点是ADR,两组之间的差异采用单变量统计方法进行评估。与标准结肠镜检查相比,Endo-Wing™辅助结肠镜检查组的ADR、腺瘤数量和腺瘤大小均显著更高(分别为P = 0.005、0.035和0.035)。两组的盲肠插管率相似(P>0.999)。两组中需要增加镇静和标准镇静的结肠镜检查比例相似(P = 0.613)。两组均未报告出血、穿孔和器械移位等不良反应。本研究得出结论,与标准结肠镜检查相比,Endo-Wing™辅助结肠镜检查可提高ADR。