• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维打印技术对牙种植体模型准确性的影响。

The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printer Technology on the Accuracy of Dental Implant Models.

作者信息

Strunz Alexander, Berger Lara, Seidel Anna, Ries Johannes, Adler Werner, Wichmann Manfred, Matta Ragai Edward

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Erlangen, Glückstrasse 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMBE), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;18(9):1902. doi: 10.3390/ma18091902.

DOI:10.3390/ma18091902
PMID:40363406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12072760/
Abstract

This study examines the impact of different 3D printing technologies on the accuracy of implant positions in printed dental models, a crucial factor in implant-supported prosthetics. A standardized titanium model with three bone-level implants was scanned using an industrial scanner to create a virtual reference model. Ten intraoral scans of the same model were performed, and the generated STL files were used to design physical models printed with three different 3D printers: two utilizing digital light processing (DLP) technology and one employing stereolithography (SLA) (n = 30). The printed models were then rescanned, and deviations from the reference STL file were analyzed. Results showed that the SLA printer exhibited the highest deviations (0.26 ± 0.17 mm), whereas the DLP printers demonstrated greater accuracy, with one DLP system (0.07 ± 0.02 mm) performing slightly better than the other (0.12 ± 0.13 mm). The SLA printer exhibited the most significant errors in the vestibulo-oral and occlusal-apical directions. The findings suggest that DLP printers offer superior precision for implant-supported restorations in digital workflows. Clinically, the choice of 3D printing technology significantly impacts model accuracy, emphasizing the importance of selecting the appropriate printer based on the required precision.

摘要

本研究考察了不同3D打印技术对打印牙科模型中种植体位置准确性的影响,这是种植体支持修复体的一个关键因素。使用工业扫描仪对带有三个骨水平种植体的标准化钛模型进行扫描,以创建虚拟参考模型。对同一模型进行了十次口内扫描,并使用生成的STL文件设计用三种不同3D打印机打印的物理模型:两台使用数字光处理(DLP)技术,一台使用立体光刻(SLA)(n = 30)。然后对打印模型进行重新扫描,并分析与参考STL文件的偏差。结果表明,SLA打印机的偏差最大(0.26±0.17毫米),而DLP打印机显示出更高的精度,其中一个DLP系统(0.07±0.02毫米)的表现略优于另一个(0.12±0.13毫米)。SLA打印机在前庭-口腔方向和咬合-根尖方向表现出最显著的误差。研究结果表明,在数字工作流程中,DLP打印机为种植体支持的修复提供了更高的精度。在临床上,3D打印技术的选择对模型准确性有显著影响,强调了根据所需精度选择合适打印机的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/7e141b33f252/materials-18-01902-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/432220bf9b7f/materials-18-01902-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/b979eb2fccaa/materials-18-01902-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/b080e2544cda/materials-18-01902-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/caa7988d79ee/materials-18-01902-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/db4565e215b4/materials-18-01902-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/6a0983db7b45/materials-18-01902-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/7e141b33f252/materials-18-01902-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/432220bf9b7f/materials-18-01902-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/b979eb2fccaa/materials-18-01902-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/b080e2544cda/materials-18-01902-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/caa7988d79ee/materials-18-01902-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/db4565e215b4/materials-18-01902-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/6a0983db7b45/materials-18-01902-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba9/12072760/7e141b33f252/materials-18-01902-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printer Technology on the Accuracy of Dental Implant Models.三维打印技术对牙种植体模型准确性的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;18(9):1902. doi: 10.3390/ma18091902.
2
Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.内部设计对立体光固化和数字光处理技术 3D 打印模型精度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):381.e1-381.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.029. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
3
Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.使用不同打印技术时,CBCT 引导种植手术导板中各阶段的误差分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Nov;132(5):995-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.018. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
4
Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.两种不同模型基底设计的 3D 打印机打印模型的精度比较。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):124-128. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13107. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing.DLP与LCD打印技术用于牙科模型打印的精度比较
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;10(10):181. doi: 10.3390/dj10100181.
6
Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations.DLP 和 SLA 打印机技术对游离端情况下种植导板精度的影响。
Int J Comput Dent. 2023 Sep 26;26(3):217-226. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3774115.
7
The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.添加剂制造技术和分型线设计对 3D 打印模具精度和尺寸稳定性的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jul;32(6):519-526. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13588. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
8
Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.商用 3D 打印机在牙科种植术中制作手术导板的准确性。
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103909. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103909. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
9
Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.三种不同 3D 打印技术制作全牙弓模型的精度评估:三维分析。
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Aug 21;65(3):365-370. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_579. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
10
The Accuracy of 3D-Printed Fixed Dental Restorations.3D打印固定义齿修复体的准确性
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Apr;37(4):1047-1061. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13365. Epub 2024 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Drill Sleeve Housing in 3D-Printed and Milled Implant Surgical Guides: A 3D Analysis Considering Machine Type, Layer Thickness, Sleeve Position, and Steam Sterilization.3D打印和铣削种植外科导板中钻套外壳的精度:一项考虑机器类型、层厚、套筒位置和蒸汽灭菌的三维分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;12(8):799. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080799.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of 3D printing technology and print orientation on the trueness of additively manufactured definitive casts with different tooth preparations.3D打印技术及打印方向对不同牙体预备的增材制造最终模型精度的影响
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105244. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105244. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
2
Impact of Scanbody Geometry and CAD Software on Determining 3D Implant Position.扫描体几何形状和CAD软件对确定三维种植体位置的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Apr 3;12(4):94. doi: 10.3390/dj12040094.
3
Effect of Different Post-Curing Methods on the Degree of Conversion of 3D-Printed Resin for Models in Dentistry.
不同后固化方法对牙科模型3D打印树脂固化程度的影响
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Feb 18;16(4):549. doi: 10.3390/polym16040549.
4
Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review of Actual Popular Technologies.牙科中的光固化3D打印:当前热门技术的全面综述
Materials (Basel). 2024 Feb 19;17(4):950. doi: 10.3390/ma17040950.
5
Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.内部设计对立体光固化和数字光处理技术 3D 打印模型精度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):381.e1-381.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.029. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
6
Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations.DLP 和 SLA 打印机技术对游离端情况下种植导板精度的影响。
Int J Comput Dent. 2023 Sep 26;26(3):217-226. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3774115.
7
Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.数字化种植体代型设计对增材制造模型中代型位置准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Dec;24(6):821-830. doi: 10.1111/cid.13137. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
8
Accuracy of 3D printed models and implant-analog positions according to the implant-analog-holder offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness: an in-vitro study.基于种植体模拟体定位器偏差、内部结构和打印层厚度的 3D 打印模型和种植体模拟体位置的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104268. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104268. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
9
In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch.在无牙颌中使用不同辅助工具对多个种植体进行体外扫描的准确性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Oct;33(10):1010-1020. doi: 10.1111/clr.13982. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
10
Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy.牙科种植体治疗中的修复体失败。
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):130-144. doi: 10.1111/prd.12416.