Institute of Condensed Matter Chemistry of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR5026, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Department of prosthodontic dentistry, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Private practice.
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103909. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103909. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of two different surgical guides (small extent = single implant and large extent = full arch) fabricated by five additive manufacturing technologies (SLA=Stereolithography, DLP= Digital Light Processing, FDM=Fused Deposition Modeling, SLS=Selective Laser Sintering, Inkjet). METHODS: Overall, 72 guides (6 per type) were obtained with the different machines (SLA=Form2; DLP=Rapid Shape D40 and Cara Print 4.0; FDM=Raise 3D Pro2; SLS=Prodways P1000; Polyjet®=Stratasys J750). The guides were surface-scanned with an optical dental scanner, and the resulting files were compared with the initial design files using a surface matching software. Root Mean Square (RMS) and standard deviation were calculated, representing respectively trueness and precision. Kruskall-Wallis non-parametric test was used to compare trueness and precision between small-extent and large-extent guides and 3D printer by pairs. The threshold for significance was α=0.05, except for the comparison of printers by pairs where a Bonferroni-corrected level of 0.0033 was used. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for trueness and precision between small-extent and large-extent guides, regardless the printer except for DLP (trueness and precision) and SLS (precision). SLA, DLP and Polyjet® technologies showed similar results in terms of trueness and precision for both small-extend and large-extend guides (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The size affected the accuracy of CAD-CAM surgical guides. The different additive manufacturing technologies had a limited impact on the accuracy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study is of clinical interest as it shows that the 3D printing technology (SLA/DLP) has a limited impact on 3D printed surgical guides accuracy. However, the size of the guide can have a significant impact, as small-extent guides were more accurate than large-extent guides.
目的:评估 5 种增材制造技术(立体光固化成型法[SLA]、数字光处理[DLP]、熔融沉积成型法[FDM]、选择性激光烧结法[SLS]、喷墨)制作的两种不同手术导板(小范围[单个种植体]和大范围[全口牙列])的准确性。
方法:总共使用不同的机器(SLA=Form2;DLP=RapidShape D40 和 Cara Print 4.0;FDM=Raise 3DPro2;SLS=Prodways P1000;Polyjet®=Stratasys J750)获得 72 个导板(每种类型 6 个)。使用光学牙科扫描仪对导板进行表面扫描,然后使用表面匹配软件将生成的文件与初始设计文件进行比较。计算均方根(RMS)和标准差,分别代表准确性和精密度。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 非参数检验对小范围和大范围导板以及 3D 打印机之间的准确性和精密度进行配对比较。除了打印机配对比较外,显著性水平α=0.05,对于打印机配对比较使用了经过 Bonferroni 校正的 0.0033 水平。
结果:无论打印机如何,小范围和大范围导板的准确性和精密度均存在显著差异,除了 DLP(准确性和精密度)和 SLS(精密度)之外。SLA、DLP 和 Polyjet®技术在小范围和大范围导板的准确性和精密度方面表现出相似的结果(P>0.05)。
结论:尺寸会影响 CAD-CAM 手术导板的准确性。不同的增材制造技术对准确性的影响有限。
临床意义:本研究具有临床意义,因为它表明 3D 打印技术(SLA/DLP)对 3D 打印手术导板的准确性影响有限。然而,导板的尺寸会产生重大影响,小范围导板比大范围导板更准确。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022-4
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018-1
J Prosthet Dent. 2019-4-1
Dent J (Basel). 2025-7-22
Dent J (Basel). 2025-7-10
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-2-28
J Funct Biomater. 2024-7-29