Zalewska Karolina, Skonieczna Maria, Nejc Dariusz, Pluta Piotr
Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Department of Surgical Oncology and Breast Diseases, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute in Lodz, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2025 May 1;14(9):3148. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093148.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the primary procedure for nodal assessment in breast cancer patients. Radioisotopes (RIs) are considered the gold-standard tool. The ferromagnetic technique (superparamagnetic iron oxide-SPIO) is a non-isotope alternative SLNB method. This study compares the efficacy of SPIO and RI SLNB across two independent breast cancer centres. A total of 406 breast cancer patients, who underwent SLNB between January 2021 and December 2022, were analysed (SPIO-223 patients, RI-183 patients). Statistical tests, including Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared analyses, compared the SLN identification rates, the number of SLNs retrieved, and the positive node detection rates. The identification rates were similar for SPIO and RI (two-tailed Fisher's exact test, = 1.0). The SPIO method retrieved significantly more SLNs than RI (3.26 vs. 2.15; < 0.001). A larger proportion of patients in the SPIO group had ≥ 5 SLNs removed (20.2% vs. 8.7%; = 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed in the proportion of metastatic SLNs to harvested SLNs between the techniques, with a larger proportion detected in the RI group (1/7.88) compared to the SPIO group (1/14.81) (chi-squared test, < 0.03). In our study, the SPIO and RI methods effectively collected SLNs. The gold-standard RI method offers distinct advantages, including its precise and consistent dosing unaffected by patient-specific factors and a highly targeted approach to node identification. These features minimise the risk of over-dissection and ensure that only the most clinically relevant nodes are removed. We note that the SPIO technique in SLNB in breast cancer patients requires further standardisation.
前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是乳腺癌患者淋巴结评估的主要方法。放射性同位素(RIs)被认为是金标准工具。铁磁技术(超顺磁性氧化铁-SPIO)是一种非同位素替代的SLNB方法。本研究比较了SPIO和RI SLNB在两个独立乳腺癌中心的疗效。分析了2021年1月至2022年12月期间接受SLNB的406例乳腺癌患者(SPIO组223例,RI组183例)。通过包括Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方分析在内的统计检验,比较了前哨淋巴结(SLN)的识别率、取出的SLN数量以及阳性淋巴结检测率。SPIO和RI的识别率相似(双侧Fisher精确检验,P = 1.0)。SPIO方法取出的SLN明显多于RI(3.26对2.15;P < 0.001)。SPIO组中切除≥5个SLN的患者比例更高(20.2%对8.7%;P = 0.001)。两种技术之间,在转移的SLN占所采集SLN的比例上观察到统计学显著差异,RI组(1/7.88)检测到的比例高于SPIO组(1/14.81)(卡方检验,P < 0.03)。在我们的研究中,SPIO和RI方法均能有效采集SLN。金标准的RI方法具有明显优势,包括其精确且一致的剂量不受患者特定因素影响,以及高度靶向的淋巴结识别方法。这些特点将过度解剖的风险降至最低,并确保仅切除最具临床相关性的淋巴结。我们注意到,乳腺癌患者SLNB中的SPIO技术需要进一步标准化。